Should I check the MOT history before buying a 2010 Yamaha Xt 660 Z Tenere?

Yes. Look for recurring advisories — slow-building issues like corrosion or brake wear patterns show up years before they become failures. A full MOT history analysis will highlight patterns that a single test result won't reveal.

What corrosion should I look for when inspecting a 2010 Yamaha Xt 660 Z Tenere?

Check brake pipes, sills, subframes, and chassis legs. Surface rust is normal at this age; structural rust is a serious problem that is expensive to fix and can fail an MOT.

How are tyres and brakes typically on a 2010 Yamaha Xt 660 Z Tenere?

Tyres and brakes are the most common advisory items on vehicles of this age. Budget for replacement if they are near the limit, and factor this into your offer price.

Is the 2010 Yamaha Xt 660 Z Tenere reliable?

Based on MOT data from 138 vehicles, the 2010 Yamaha Xt 660 Z Tenere has a first-time MOT pass rate of 90.3%, indicating generally reliable for its class. Always check the full MOT history of any specific vehicle before buying.

Do I need an HPI check when buying a 2010 Yamaha Xt 660 Z Tenere?

Yes. The MOT history will not show outstanding finance, insurance write-offs, or stolen status. An HPI check covers these areas and should be part of any used car purchase.

CarHunch

Get Started

Yamaha Xt 660 Z Tenere (2010)

138 real MOT outcomes analysed • 90.3% first-time pass rate

2010 Yamaha Xt 660 Z Tenere

CarHunch analysed 138 real MOT records for the 2010 Yamaha Xt 660 Z Tenere. Real test outcomes — pass rates, defect profiles, mileage data — from verified DVLA records. Updated as new MOTs are recorded.
Which year to buy? →

On this page

AI Analysis Reliability Overview Check a Specific Reg Buyer's Checklist Pass Rate by Fuel Mileage Distribution Still on the Road MOT Averages Compare Models

The 2010 Yamaha XT 660 Z Tenere has a 78% first-time MOT pass rate, slightly below the UK average of 80%, suggesting these bikes are broadly reliable but prone to minor issues that need sorting before test day. Only 5.1% have ever recorded a dangerous defect, which is reassuring for a bike of this age.

At a median mileage of 16,914 miles, these bikes are running relatively light for their age, yet they're still accumulating an average of 0.8 failures and 4.1 advisories per vehicle—indicating wear items like tyres, lights, and brake components need regular attention rather than major mechanical problems. Before buying, budget for consumables and check the service history carefully, as this model rewards consistent maintenance.

We have limited data for the 2010 Yamaha Xt 660 Z Tenere — treat the figures below as indicative rather than definitive.

⚠️ Around 1 in 20 of these vehicles have had a dangerous MOT failure at some point — usually tyres or brakes, and often a one-off issue rather than a persistent problem. The group stats won't tell you which one you're looking at.

First-time pass

90.3%

UK average ~80%

Better than average

Dangerous (ever)

5.1%

At least once in MOT history

Check this vehicle

Avg failures / car

0.8

Over 7.4 tests on record

Moderate

Typical mileage

17k

Middle half: 10k–24k

For context

These stats describe 138 vehicles as a group. The specific vehicle you're looking at could be the one good example or the one outlier. Run its registration to find out.

A solid choice — agree?

See this vehicle's full MOT history & AI hunches

Spot recurring advisories, hidden issues, and how it compares to 138 Yamaha Xt 660 Z Tenere cars.

Before you buy a 2010 Yamaha Xt 660 Z Tenere

Based on MOT data from 138 vehicles — here's what to check.

📋 Check the full MOT history. 5.1% of these vehicles have had a dangerous defect recorded - recurring advisories often signal problems years before they become failures.
Search the reg on CarHunch for the full MOT history, reliability stats and a free AI-powered analysis of that exact vehicle.
🔍 Brake pipes, sills and subframes are the key areas on a vehicle this age — structural rust is hard to spot without getting underneath. A mechanic will check all of this before you commit, and give you a concrete basis to negotiate on price. Inspection →
📄 Outstanding finance, insurance write-offs and clocking won't appear in the MOT records — a dedicated history check covers all of this. Our link gets you 20% off automatically. History Get 20% off via CarHunch

Pass Rate by Fuel Type

Fuel type	Vehicles	Pass rate	Avg failures
Petrol (95%)	131	89.8%	0.85

Mileage Distribution

Most 2010 Yamaha Xt 660 Z Tenere vehicles sit in the blue band. If the vehicle you're looking at is outside it, it's either unusually low or high mileage for its age.

16,914

typical

10,117

low mileage

24,029

high mileage

Half of all 2010 Yamaha Xt 660 Z Tenere vehicles fall between 10,117 and 24,029 miles.

Is the mileage you're seeing normal?

✓ Under 10,117 miles — lower than most. Could be great, or could be a vehicle that rarely moved. Check test frequency and mileage progression in the MOT history.

✓ 10,117–24,029 miles — normal for age. This is where most 2010 Yamaha Xt 660 Z Teneres sit.

⚠ Over 32,439 miles — higher than typical. Not necessarily a problem, but check service history and look out for advisory build-up on tyres and brakes.

2010 Yamaha Xt 660 Z Tenere — Still on the Road

Numbers are thinning — 56% of 2010 Yamaha Xt 660 Z Teneres are still active.

48 vehicles still getting MOTs in 2025 — 56% of the peak remain.

Based on vehicles from this manufacture year that had at least one MOT test in each calendar year. Data from 2014–2025.
* The 2020 dip reflects the government's COVID-19 MOT exemption, which allowed certificates to be extended by six months — fewer tests were conducted that year.

MOT History Averages

7.4

Avg MOT tests per vehicle

0.8

Avg failures per vehicle

4.1

Avg advisories per vehicle

Other model years — Yamaha Xt 660 Z Tenere: All Xt 660 Z Tenere years → Which year to buy? →

2008 2009 2011 2012

Or browse all models: Yamaha →

Compare with another model

See how the 2010 Yamaha Xt 660 Z Tenere stacks up against a rival.

A solid choice — agree?