TVR

TVR Griffith (1996)

108 real MOT outcomes analysed • 85.4% first-time pass rate

1996 TVR Griffith

CarHunch analysed 108 real MOT records for the 1996 TVR Griffith. Real test outcomes — pass rates, defect profiles, mileage data — from verified DVLA records. Updated as new MOTs are recorded.
Which year to buy? →

On this page
AI Analysis Reliability Overview Common Issues Check a Specific Reg Buyer's Checklist Pass Rate by Fuel Mileage Distribution Still on the Road MOT Averages Compare Models

The 1996 TVR Griffith passes its MOT just 66.5% of the time—a full 13.5 percentage points below the UK average of 80%—which reflects the demands of maintaining a 28-year-old performance car with aging systems. While dangerous defects aren't rampant at 9.3%, these Griffiths average 1.56 failures per test and 5.0 advisories, suggesting that when they fail, they fail on multiple fronts.

The median mileage of 46,651 miles is notably low for a vehicle this age, indicating that survivors in the test pool have been well-preserved rather than driven hard. If you're considering one, budget for comprehensive pre-purchase inspections on brakes, suspension, and electrical systems—the high advisory count hints at nickel-and-diming issues—and factor in specialist maintenance costs that will dwarf those of a mainstream 1990s car.

We have limited data for the 1996 TVR Griffith — treat the figures below as indicative rather than definitive.

⚠️ About 1 in 12 of these vehicles have had a dangerous MOT failure at some point — usually tyres or brakes, and often a one-off issue rather than a persistent problem. The group stats won't tell you which one you're looking at.
First-time pass
85.4%
UK average ~80%
Around average
Dangerous (ever)
9.3%
At least once in MOT history
Check this vehicle
Avg failures / car
1.56
Over 10.8 tests on record
High
Typical mileage
47k
Middle half: 31k–57k
For context

These stats describe 108 vehicles as a group. The specific vehicle you're looking at could be the one good example or the one outlier. Run its registration to find out.

A solid choice — agree?

What tends to go wrong

Across 108 vehicles — figures show how many had each issue flagged at least once in their MOT history.

Other issues 45%
Oil leak · Oil leak, but not excessive · Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 40mm circle outside zone 'A' · …
Tyre wear 30.7%
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit · Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit · Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit · …
Budget for a full set — on a vehicle this age, tyres are expected consumables. An inspection will confirm how much is left.
Exhaust & emissions 16.7%
Exhaust emissions carbon monoxide content after 2nd fast idle excessive · Exhaust emissions carbon monoxide content at idle excessive · Exhaust emissions Lambda reading after 2nd fast idle outside specified limits
Wipers & washers 12.5%
Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid
Corrosion / rust 11.6%
Vehicle structure has slight corrosion
Inspect sills, subframes and brake pipes in person — photos rarely show structural rust.
Brake wear 10.2%
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements
Ask the seller when brakes were last serviced. If they don't know, factor in the cost.
Lighting 9.3%
Offside Headlamp aim too high · Nearside Headlamp aim too high
Usually cheap to fix. Worth confirming all lights work before collecting.

Data covers a 3-year window centred on 1996.

See this vehicle's full MOT history & AI hunches

Spot recurring advisories, hidden issues, and how it compares to 108 TVR Griffith cars.

UK

Before you buy a 1996 TVR Griffith

Based on MOT data from 108 vehicles — here's what to check.

  • 📋 Check the full MOT history. 9.3% of these vehicles have had a dangerous defect recorded - recurring advisories often signal problems years before they become failures.
    Search the reg on CarHunch for the full MOT history, reliability stats and a free AI-powered analysis of that exact vehicle.
  • 🔍 Brake pipes, sills and subframes are the key areas on a vehicle this age — structural rust is hard to spot without getting underneath. A mechanic will check all of this before you commit, and give you a concrete basis to negotiate on price. Inspection ClickMechanic
  • 📄 Outstanding finance, insurance write-offs and clocking won't appear in the MOT records — a dedicated history check covers all of this. Our link gets you 20% off automatically. History carVertical Get 20% off via CarHunch

Pass Rate by Fuel Type

Fuel type Vehicles Pass rate Avg failures
Petrol (97%) 105 85.4% 1.57

Mileage Distribution

Most 1996 TVR Griffith vehicles sit in the blue band. If the vehicle you're looking at is outside it, it's either unusually low or high mileage for its age.

46,651
typical
30,537
low mileage
56,948
high mileage

Half of all 1996 TVR Griffith vehicles fall between 30,537 and 56,948 miles.

Is the mileage you're seeing normal?
Under 30,537 miles — lower than most. Could be great, or could be a vehicle that rarely moved. Check test frequency and mileage progression in the MOT history.
30,537–56,948 miles — normal for age. This is where most 1996 TVR Griffiths sit.
Over 76,879 miles — higher than typical. Not necessarily a problem, but check service history and look out for advisory build-up on tyres and brakes.

1996 TVR Griffith — Still on the Road

Most 1996 TVR Griffiths are still being driven.

Strong survival — 42 vehicles still getting MOTs in 2025, 88% of the peak.

46 42 2014 2025

Based on vehicles from this manufacture year that had at least one MOT test in each calendar year. Data from 2014–2025.
* The 2020 dip reflects the government's COVID-19 MOT exemption, which allowed certificates to be extended by six months — fewer tests were conducted that year.

MOT History Averages

10.8
Avg MOT tests per vehicle
1.56
Avg failures per vehicle
5
Avg advisories per vehicle
Other model years — TVR Griffith: All Griffith years → Which year to buy? →
1992

Or browse all models: TVR →

TVR logo

Compare with another model

See how the 1996 TVR Griffith stacks up against a rival.

A solid choice — agree?