Triumph

Triumph Tiger (2002)

250 real MOT outcomes analysed • 86.9% first-time pass rate

2002 Triumph Tiger

CarHunch analysed 250 real MOT records for the 2002 Triumph Tiger. Real test outcomes — pass rates, defect profiles, mileage data — from verified DVLA records. Updated as new MOTs are recorded.
Which year to buy? →

On this page
AI Analysis Reliability Overview Common Issues Check a Specific Reg Buyer's Checklist Pass Rate by Fuel Mileage Distribution Still on the Road MOT Averages Colour Breakdown Compare Models

The 2002 Triumph Tiger has a first-time pass rate of 86.9%, which is a solid 6.9 percentage points above the UK average—a genuinely positive sign for reliability. However, nearly one in five of these bikes (19.6%) have recorded a dangerous defect at some point, so a pre-purchase inspection by a qualified technician is non-negotiable.

At an average mileage of 27,397 km, these Tigers have been used moderately for their age, and the 2.0 average failures per test suggest they're generally sound mechanically. The high advisory count of 7.0 per vehicle points to minor wear items and cosmetic issues rather than structural problems—get a mechanic to prioritise the dangerous defects checklist before handing over any money.

We have limited data for the 2002 Triumph Tiger — treat the figures below as indicative rather than definitive.

⚠️ Around 1 in 8 of these vehicles have had a dangerous MOT failure at some point — usually tyres or brakes, and often a one-off issue rather than a persistent problem. The group stats won't tell you which one you're looking at.
First-time pass
86.9%
UK average ~80%
Around average
Dangerous (ever)
19.6%
At least once in MOT history
Check this vehicle
Avg failures / car
2
Over 14.2 tests on record
High
Typical mileage
26k
Middle half: 17k–34k
For context

These stats describe 250 vehicles as a group. The specific vehicle you're looking at could be the one good example or the one outlier. Run its registration to find out.

Average reliability — agree?

What tends to go wrong

Across 250 vehicles — figures show how many had each issue flagged at least once in their MOT history.

Tyre wear 55.5%
Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit · Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit
Budget for a full set — on a vehicle this age, tyres are expected consumables. An inspection will confirm how much is left.
Lighting 50.4%
Drive chain slightly loose
Usually cheap to fix. Worth confirming all lights work before collecting.
Brake wear 25.4%
Rear Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit · Front Roller brake test indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort · Rear Brake disc(s) slightly worn · …
Ask the seller when brakes were last serviced. If they don't know, factor in the cost.
Other issues 15.6%
Drive chain worn but not considered excessive · Horn not working
Suspension & steering 10.3%
Steering movement slightly 'notchy'
Harder to spot without a ramp — this is a good reason to book a pre-purchase inspection.

Data covers a 3-year window centred on 2002.

See this vehicle's full MOT history & AI hunches

Spot recurring advisories, hidden issues, and how it compares to 250 Triumph Tiger cars.

UK

Before you buy a 2002 Triumph Tiger

Based on MOT data from 250 vehicles — here's what to check.

  • 📋 Check the full MOT history. 19.6% of these vehicles have had a dangerous defect recorded - recurring advisories often signal problems years before they become failures.
    Search the reg on CarHunch for the full MOT history, reliability stats and a free AI-powered analysis of that exact vehicle.
  • 🔍 Brake pipes, sills and subframes are the key areas on a vehicle this age — structural rust is hard to spot without getting underneath. A mechanic will check all of this before you commit, and give you a concrete basis to negotiate on price. Inspection ClickMechanic
  • 📄 Outstanding finance, insurance write-offs and clocking won't appear in the MOT records — a dedicated history check covers all of this. Our link gets you 20% off automatically. History carVertical Get 20% off via CarHunch

Pass Rate by Fuel Type

Fuel type Vehicles Pass rate Avg failures
Petrol (99%) 248 86.8% 2.01

Colour Breakdown

Based on 24,753 Triumph Tiger vehicles registered in the UK — across all years. From DVLA registration records.

Black 22.8%
5,641
White 22.4%
5,555
Blue 19.1%
4,728
Red 10%
2,477
Silver 7.8%
1,936
Green 7.7%
1,909
Grey 4.1%
1,026
Orange 3.7%
920
Yellow 1.7%
426
Multi-colour 0.2%
50
Maroon 0.2%
45
Gold 0.2%
40

Mileage Distribution

Most 2002 Triumph Tiger vehicles sit in the blue band. If the vehicle you're looking at is outside it, it's either unusually low or high mileage for its age.

25,605
typical
16,762
low mileage
33,609
high mileage

Half of all 2002 Triumph Tiger vehicles fall between 16,762 and 33,609 miles.

Is the mileage you're seeing normal?
Under 16,762 miles — lower than most. Could be great, or could be a vehicle that rarely moved. Check test frequency and mileage progression in the MOT history.
16,762–33,609 miles — normal for age. This is where most 2002 Triumph Tigers sit.
Over 45,372 miles — higher than typical. Not necessarily a problem, but check service history and look out for advisory build-up on tyres and brakes.

2002 Triumph Tiger — Still on the Road

Numbers are thinning — 60% of 2002 Triumph Tigers are still active.

98 vehicles still getting MOTs in 2025 — 60% of the peak remain.

162 98 2014 2025

Based on vehicles from this manufacture year that had at least one MOT test in each calendar year. Data from 2014–2025.
* The 2020 dip reflects the government's COVID-19 MOT exemption, which allowed certificates to be extended by six months — fewer tests were conducted that year.

MOT History Averages

14.2
Avg MOT tests per vehicle
2
Avg failures per vehicle
7
Avg advisories per vehicle
Other model years — Triumph Tiger: All Tiger years → Which year to buy? →
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Or browse all models: Triumph →

Triumph logo

Compare with another model

See how the 2002 Triumph Tiger stacks up against a rival.

Average reliability — agree?