Should I check the MOT history before buying a 2010 Toyota Landcruiser?

Yes. Look for recurring advisories — slow-building issues like corrosion or brake wear patterns show up years before they become failures. A full MOT history analysis will highlight patterns that a single test result won't reveal.

What corrosion should I look for when inspecting a 2010 Toyota Landcruiser?

Check brake pipes, sills, subframes, and chassis legs. Surface rust is normal at this age; structural rust is a serious problem that is expensive to fix and can fail an MOT.

How are tyres and brakes typically on a 2010 Toyota Landcruiser?

Tyres and brakes are the most common advisory items on vehicles of this age. Budget for replacement if they are near the limit, and factor this into your offer price.

How many 2010 Toyota Landcruiser vehicles have had dangerous defects recorded?

22% of these vehicles have had a dangerous defect recorded. Search the registration on CarHunch — the full MOT history will show exactly what was flagged and whether it was resolved.

Is the 2010 Toyota Landcruiser reliable?

Based on MOT data from 228 vehicles, the 2010 Toyota Landcruiser has a first-time MOT pass rate of 85.7%, indicating generally reliable for its class. Always check the full MOT history of any specific vehicle before buying.

What are common problems with the 2010 Toyota Landcruiser?

The most frequently recorded MOT issues on the 2010 Toyota Landcruiser are: Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (49.4% of vehicles), Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (36.5% of vehicles), Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (22.1% of vehicles). These figures are based on actual MOT test records — search a specific registration on CarHunch to see its individual history.

Do I need an HPI check when buying a 2010 Toyota Landcruiser?

Yes. The MOT history will not show outstanding finance, insurance write-offs, or stolen status. An HPI check covers these areas and should be part of any used car purchase.

CarHunch

Get Started

Toyota Landcruiser (2010)

228 real MOT outcomes analysed • 85.7% first-time pass rate

2010 Toyota Landcruiser

CarHunch analysed 228 real MOT records for the 2010 Toyota Landcruiser. Real test outcomes — pass rates, defect profiles, mileage data — from verified DVLA records. Updated as new MOTs are recorded.
Which year to buy? →

On this page

AI Analysis Reliability Overview Common Issues Check a Specific Reg Buyer's Checklist Pass Rate by Fuel Mileage Distribution Still on the Road MOT Averages Colour Breakdown Compare Models

The 2010 Toyota Landcruiser posts a first-time pass rate of 84.9%, which is above the UK average of 80%, suggesting this generation holds up reasonably well in testing. However, one in five of these vehicles (21.5%) have recorded a dangerous defect at some point, which is a material concern for buyers and worth thorough pre-purchase inspection.

These Landcruisers are running at modest mileage for their age—a median of 70,571 miles—and the typical vehicle racks up 1.78 failures and 11.3 advisories per test, indicating minor wear items rather than structural problems. Before committing to one, have a specialist inspect the brakes, suspension, and lights with particular care, since the high dangerous-defect rate suggests these areas need closer scrutiny than standard checks.

We have limited data for the 2010 Toyota Landcruiser — treat the figures below as indicative rather than definitive.

⚠️ Over 1 in 5 of these vehicles have had a dangerous MOT failure at some point — usually tyres or brakes, and often a one-off issue rather than a persistent problem. The group stats won't tell you which one you're looking at.

First-time pass

85.7%

UK average ~80%

Around average

Dangerous (ever)

21.5%

At least once in MOT history

Check this vehicle

Avg failures / car

1.78

Over 10 tests on record

High

Typical mileage

71k

Middle half: 51k–99k

For context

These stats describe 228 vehicles as a group. The specific vehicle you're looking at could be the one good example or the one outlier. Run its registration to find out.

Average reliability — agree?

What tends to go wrong

Across 228 vehicles — figures show how many had each issue flagged at least once in their MOT history.

Brake wear 49.4%

Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin · Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin · Offside Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material · …

Ask the seller when brakes were last serviced. If they don't know, factor in the cost.

Tyre wear 22.1%

Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge · Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge · Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit · …

Budget for a full set — on a vehicle this age, tyres are expected consumables. An inspection will confirm how much is left.

Other issues 17.4%

Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view · Under-trays fitted obscuring some underside components · Oil leak, but not excessive

Data covers a 3-year window centred on 2010.

See this vehicle's full MOT history & AI hunches

Spot recurring advisories, hidden issues, and how it compares to 228 Toyota Landcruiser cars.

Before you buy a 2010 Toyota Landcruiser

Based on MOT data from 228 vehicles — here's what to check.

📋 Check the full MOT history. 21.5% of these vehicles have had a dangerous defect recorded - recurring advisories often signal problems years before they become failures.
Search the reg on CarHunch for the full MOT history, reliability stats and a free AI-powered analysis of that exact vehicle.
🔍 Brake pipes, sills and subframes are the key areas on a vehicle this age — structural rust is hard to spot without getting underneath. A mechanic will check all of this before you commit, and give you a concrete basis to negotiate on price. Inspection →
📄 Outstanding finance, insurance write-offs and clocking won't appear in the MOT records — a dedicated history check covers all of this. Our link gets you 20% off automatically. History Get 20% off via CarHunch

Pass Rate by Fuel Type

Fuel type	Vehicles	Pass rate	Avg failures
Diesel (100%)	227	85.7%	1.78

Colour Breakdown

Based on 16,117 Toyota Landcruiser vehicles registered in the UK — across all years. From DVLA registration records.

Silver 25.9%

4,171

Green 15.2%

2,454

Blue 14.8%

2,390

Black 12.6%

2,027

Grey 10.7%

1,719

Red 9.9%

1,589

White 5.6%

910

Beige 2.4%

392

Gold 1.7%

273

Brown 0.5%

Maroon 0.4%

Bronze 0.3%

Mileage Distribution

Most 2010 Toyota Landcruiser vehicles sit in the blue band. If the vehicle you're looking at is outside it, it's either unusually low or high mileage for its age.

70,571

typical

51,113

low mileage

98,890

high mileage

Half of all 2010 Toyota Landcruiser vehicles fall between 51,113 and 98,890 miles.

Is the mileage you're seeing normal?

✓ Under 51,113 miles — lower than most. Could be great, or could be a vehicle that rarely moved. Check test frequency and mileage progression in the MOT history.

✓ 51,113–98,890 miles — normal for age. This is where most 2010 Toyota Landcruisers sit.

⚠ Over 133,501 miles — higher than typical. Not necessarily a problem, but check service history and look out for advisory build-up on tyres and brakes.

2010 Toyota Landcruiser — Still on the Road

Numbers are thinning — 58% of 2010 Toyota Landcruisers are still active.

107 vehicles still getting MOTs in 2025 — 58% of the peak remain.

Based on vehicles from this manufacture year that had at least one MOT test in each calendar year. Data from 2014–2025.
* The 2020 dip reflects the government's COVID-19 MOT exemption, which allowed certificates to be extended by six months — fewer tests were conducted that year.

MOT History Averages

Avg MOT tests per vehicle

1.78

Avg failures per vehicle

11.3

Avg advisories per vehicle

Other model years — Toyota Landcruiser: All Landcruiser years → Which year to buy? →

1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2011 2012 2013

Or browse all models: Toyota →

Compare with another model

See how the 2010 Toyota Landcruiser stacks up against a rival.

Average reliability — agree?