Should I check the MOT history before buying a 1995 Renault Extra?

Yes. Look for recurring advisories — slow-building issues like corrosion or brake wear patterns show up years before they become failures. A full MOT history analysis will highlight patterns that a single test result won't reveal.

What corrosion should I look for when inspecting a 1995 Renault Extra?

Check brake pipes, sills, subframes, and chassis legs. Surface rust is normal at this age; structural rust is a serious problem that is expensive to fix and can fail an MOT.

How are tyres and brakes typically on a 1995 Renault Extra?

Tyres and brakes are the most common advisory items on vehicles of this age. Budget for replacement if they are near the limit, and factor this into your offer price.

Is the 1995 Renault Extra reliable?

Based on MOT data from 1,534 vehicles, the 1995 Renault Extra has a first-time MOT pass rate of 64.4%, indicating average reliability for its class. Always check the full MOT history of any specific vehicle before buying.

What are common problems with the 1995 Renault Extra?

The most frequently recorded MOT issues on the 1995 Renault Extra are: Oil leak (27.9% of vehicles), Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (21.7% of vehicles), Nearside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (19.5% of vehicles). These figures are based on actual MOT test records — search a specific registration on CarHunch to see its individual history.

Do I need an HPI check when buying a 1995 Renault Extra?

Yes. The MOT history will not show outstanding finance, insurance write-offs, or stolen status. An HPI check covers these areas and should be part of any used car purchase.

CarHunch

Get Started

Renault Extra (1995)

1,534 real MOT outcomes analysed • 64.4% first-time pass rate

1995 Renault Extra

CarHunch analysed 1,534 real MOT records for the 1995 Renault Extra. Real test outcomes — pass rates, defect profiles, mileage data — from verified DVLA records. Updated as new MOTs are recorded.
Which year to buy? →

On this page

AI Analysis Reliability Overview Common Issues Check a Specific Reg Buyer's Checklist Pass Rate by Fuel Mileage Distribution MOT Averages Colour Breakdown Compare Models

The 1995 Renault Extra passes its MOT first time in only 62.5% of cases, well below the UK average of 80%, which signals a fleet with meaningful reliability concerns. Diesel variants fare slightly better at 63.4% pass rate versus petrol at 52.6%, though neither is reassuring, and 10.8% of these vehicles have recorded dangerous defects—a relatively low proportion but still worth noting.

These vans are averaging around 110,000 miles, typical for their age, yet they're racking up an average of 1.48 failures and 3.2 advisories per test, suggesting structural or wear-related issues rather than freak problems. If you're considering one, have a trusted mechanic inspect the undercarriage and brakes thoroughly before purchase, as the failure patterns indicate these areas take a beating.

The 1995 Renault Extra has a below-average first-time pass rate (64.4% vs ~80% UK average) — check the specific vehicle's full MOT history carefully before buying.

⚠️ About 1 in 12 of these vehicles have had a dangerous MOT failure at some point — usually tyres or brakes, and often a one-off issue rather than a persistent problem. The group stats won't tell you which one you're looking at.

First-time pass

64.4%

UK average ~80%

Below average

Dangerous (ever)

10.8%

At least once in MOT history

Check this vehicle

Avg failures / car

1.48

Over 3.9 tests on record

High

Typical mileage

108k

Middle half: 86k–132k

For context

⚠️ Below average. More vehicles in this cohort fail their first MOT than typical. Scrutinise this vehicle's history — look for recurring issues, not just the latest result.

🔧 Expect consumable spend. An average of 3.2 advisories per vehicle tells you wear items (tyres, brakes) get flagged regularly. Budget for them — they're not surprises.

🔍 The dangerous defect figure is real. Most are one-off tyre failures or brake issues — not structural problems. But it's exactly why checking the individual vehicle's history is essential, not optional.

These stats describe 1,534 vehicles as a group. The specific vehicle you're looking at could be the one good example or the one outlier. Run its registration to find out.

Buyer beware — pass it on

What tends to go wrong

Across 1,534 vehicles — figures show how many had each issue flagged at least once in their MOT history.

Other issues 27.9%

Oil leak

Tyre wear 21.7%

Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit · Nearside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm · Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit · …

Budget for a full set — on a vehicle this age, tyres are expected consumables. An inspection will confirm how much is left.

Brake wear 13.9%

Brakes imbalanced across an axle · Brake load sensing valve linkage seized · Nearside Front Brake hose slightly deteriorated · …

Ask the seller when brakes were last serviced. If they don't know, factor in the cost.

Suspension & steering 11.9%

Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded · Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded · Offside Steering rack gaiter split · …

Harder to spot without a ramp — this is a good reason to book a pre-purchase inspection.

Data covers a 3-year window centred on 1995.

See this vehicle's full MOT history & AI hunches

Spot recurring advisories, hidden issues, and how it compares to 1,534 Renault Extra cars.

Before you buy a 1995 Renault Extra

Based on MOT data from 1,534 vehicles — here's what to check.

📋 Check the full MOT history. 10.8% of these vehicles have had a dangerous defect recorded - recurring advisories often signal problems years before they become failures.
Search the reg on CarHunch for the full MOT history, reliability stats and a free AI-powered analysis of that exact vehicle.
🔍 Brake pipes, sills and subframes are the key areas on a vehicle this age — structural rust is hard to spot without getting underneath. A mechanic will check all of this before you commit, and give you a concrete basis to negotiate on price. Inspection →
📄 Outstanding finance, insurance write-offs and clocking won't appear in the MOT records — a dedicated history check covers all of this. Our link gets you 20% off automatically. History Get 20% off via CarHunch

Pass Rate by Fuel Type

Fuel type	Vehicles	Pass rate	Avg failures
Diesel (91%)	1,396	64.4%	1.44
Petrol (9%)	138	64.3%	1.85

Colour Breakdown

Based on 35,376 Renault Extra vehicles registered in the UK — across all years. From DVLA registration records.

White 64.1%

22,661

Red 16%

5,657

Blue 14.4%

5,107

Beige 2.2%

768

Green 0.6%

220

Silver 0.6%

220

Yellow 0.6%

210

Grey 0.6%

210

Black 0.4%

134

Orange 0.3%

109

Multi-colour 0.1%

Brown 0.1%

Mileage Distribution

Most 1995 Renault Extra vehicles sit in the blue band. If the vehicle you're looking at is outside it, it's either unusually low or high mileage for its age.

107,861

typical

86,443

low mileage

132,105

high mileage

Half of all 1995 Renault Extra vehicles fall between 86,443 and 132,105 miles.

Is the mileage you're seeing normal?

✓ Under 86,443 miles — lower than most. Could be great, or could be a vehicle that rarely moved. Check test frequency and mileage progression in the MOT history.

✓ 86,443–132,105 miles — normal for age. This is where most 1995 Renault Extras sit.

⚠ Over 178,341 miles — higher than typical. Not necessarily a problem, but check service history and look out for advisory build-up on tyres and brakes.

MOT History Averages

3.9

Avg MOT tests per vehicle

1.48

Avg failures per vehicle

3.2

Avg advisories per vehicle

Other model years — Renault Extra: All Extra years → Which year to buy? →

1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1996 1997 1998 1999

Or browse all models: Renault →

Compare with another model

See how the 1995 Renault Extra stacks up against a rival.

Buyer beware — pass it on