Should I check the MOT history before buying a 1995 Metrocab Manual?

Yes. Look for recurring advisories — slow-building issues like corrosion or brake wear patterns show up years before they become failures. A full MOT history analysis will highlight patterns that a single test result won't reveal.

What corrosion should I look for when inspecting a 1995 Metrocab Manual?

Check brake pipes, sills, subframes, and chassis legs. Surface rust is normal at this age; structural rust is a serious problem that is expensive to fix and can fail an MOT.

How are tyres and brakes typically on a 1995 Metrocab Manual?

Tyres and brakes are the most common advisory items on vehicles of this age. Budget for replacement if they are near the limit, and factor this into your offer price.

Is the 1995 Metrocab Manual reliable?

Based on MOT data from 220 vehicles, the 1995 Metrocab Manual has a first-time MOT pass rate of 66.4%, indicating average reliability for its class. Always check the full MOT history of any specific vehicle before buying.

Do I need an HPI check when buying a 1995 Metrocab Manual?

Yes. The MOT history will not show outstanding finance, insurance write-offs, or stolen status. An HPI check covers these areas and should be part of any used car purchase.

CarHunch

Get Started

Metrocab Manual (1995)

Q: What are common problems with the 1995 Metrocab Manual?

The most frequently recorded MOT issues on the 1995 Metrocab Manual are: Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (73.3% of vehicles), Exhaust emits an excessive level of metered smoke for a non-turbo charged engine (38.6% of vehicles), Oil leak (28.8% of vehicles). These figures are based on actual MOT test records — search a specific registration on CarHunch to see its individual history.

220 real MOT outcomes analysed • 66.4% first-time pass rate

1995 Metrocab Manual

CarHunch analysed 220 real MOT records for the 1995 Metrocab Manual. Real test outcomes — pass rates, defect profiles, mileage data — from verified DVLA records. Updated as new MOTs are recorded.
Which year to buy? →

On this page

AI Analysis Reliability Overview Common Issues Check a Specific Reg Buyer's Checklist Pass Rate by Fuel Mileage Distribution MOT Averages Colour Breakdown Compare Models

The 1995 Metrocab Manual has a first-time pass rate of just 30.5%—less than half the UK average of 80%—making it a significantly unreliable proposition for most buyers. With 12.3% of vehicles having suffered dangerous defects, this is a model where safety issues have been a genuine concern across the surviving fleet.

These are extremely high-mileage vehicles, averaging 246,228 miles, which explains some of the poor test performance, though the sheer volume of failures (0.89 per vehicle) and advisories (1.5 per vehicle) suggests fundamental durability problems beyond wear-and-tear. If you're considering one, budget heavily for repairs, have a pre-purchase inspection by someone familiar with Metrocabs specifically, and seriously question whether the savings are worth the ongoing cost and reliability headaches.

We have limited data for the 1995 Metrocab Manual — treat the figures below as indicative rather than definitive.

⚠️ Around 1 in 8 of these vehicles have had a dangerous MOT failure at some point — usually tyres or brakes, and often a one-off issue rather than a persistent problem. The group stats won't tell you which one you're looking at.

First-time pass

66.4%

UK average ~80%

Below average

Dangerous (ever)

12.3%

At least once in MOT history

Check this vehicle

Avg failures / car

0.89

Over 3.1 tests on record

Moderate

Typical mileage

246k

Middle half: 171k–317k

For context

These stats describe 220 vehicles as a group. The specific vehicle you're looking at could be the one good example or the one outlier. Run its registration to find out.

Buyer beware — pass it on

What tends to go wrong

Across 220 vehicles — figures show how many had each issue flagged at least once in their MOT history.

Brake wear 73.3%

Parking brake: efficiency below requirements · Service brake: efficiency below requirements · Nearside rear parking brake recording little or no effort · …

Ask the seller when brakes were last serviced. If they don't know, factor in the cost.

Exhaust & emissions 38.6%

Exhaust emits an excessive level of metered smoke for a non-turbo charged engine

Other issues 28.8%

Oil leak · Fuel pipe/s corroded · Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 40mm circle outside zone 'A'

Suspension & steering 16.7%

Steering system has slight free play detected at steering wheel · Offside Front Axle king pin has slight play in pin and/or bush · Nearside Front Axle king pin has excessive play in pin and/or bush adversely affecting the steering · …

Harder to spot without a ramp — this is a good reason to book a pre-purchase inspection.

Lighting 11.4%

Offside Rear fog lamp not working

Usually cheap to fix. Worth confirming all lights work before collecting.

Tyre wear 10.6%

Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit

Budget for a full set — on a vehicle this age, tyres are expected consumables. An inspection will confirm how much is left.

Data covers a 3-year window centred on 1995.

See this vehicle's full MOT history & AI hunches

Spot recurring advisories, hidden issues, and how it compares to 220 Metrocab Manual cars.

Before you buy a 1995 Metrocab Manual

Based on MOT data from 220 vehicles — here's what to check.

📋 Check the full MOT history. 12.3% of these vehicles have had a dangerous defect recorded - recurring advisories often signal problems years before they become failures.
Search the reg on CarHunch for the full MOT history, reliability stats and a free AI-powered analysis of that exact vehicle.
🔍 Brake pipes, sills and subframes are the key areas on a vehicle this age — structural rust is hard to spot without getting underneath. A mechanic will check all of this before you commit, and give you a concrete basis to negotiate on price. Inspection →
📄 Outstanding finance, insurance write-offs and clocking won't appear in the MOT records — a dedicated history check covers all of this. Our link gets you 20% off automatically. History Get 20% off via CarHunch

Pass Rate by Fuel Type

Fuel type	Vehicles	Pass rate	Avg failures
Diesel (100%)	219	66.3%	0.89

Colour Breakdown

Based on 2,103 Metrocab Manual vehicles registered in the UK — across all years. From DVLA registration records.

Black 63%

1,324

Blue 14.1%

296

White 7.8%

165

Green 5.8%

122

Red 4.9%

102

Yellow 1.6%

Maroon 1.3%

Silver 1%

Grey 0.4%

Purple 0.2%

Mileage Distribution

Most 1995 Metrocab Manual vehicles sit in the blue band. If the vehicle you're looking at is outside it, it's either unusually low or high mileage for its age.

245,896

typical

171,338

low mileage

316,746

high mileage

Half of all 1995 Metrocab Manual vehicles fall between 171,338 and 316,746 miles.

Is the mileage you're seeing normal?

✓ Under 171,338 miles — lower than most. Could be great, or could be a vehicle that rarely moved. Check test frequency and mileage progression in the MOT history.

✓ 171,338–316,746 miles — normal for age. This is where most 1995 Metrocab Manuals sit.

⚠ Over 427,607 miles — higher than typical. Not necessarily a problem, but check service history and look out for advisory build-up on tyres and brakes.

MOT History Averages

3.1

Avg MOT tests per vehicle

0.89

Avg failures per vehicle

1.5

Avg advisories per vehicle

Other model years — Metrocab Manual: All Manual years → Which year to buy? →

1991 1992 1993 1994 1996 1997 1998 1999

Or browse all models: Metrocab →

Compare with another model

See how the 1995 Metrocab Manual stacks up against a rival.

Buyer beware — pass it on