Should I check the MOT history before buying a 2019 Lexmoto Assault 125 Hj 125 J E4?

Yes. Look for recurring advisories — slow-building issues like corrosion or brake wear patterns show up years before they become failures. A full MOT history analysis will highlight patterns that a single test result won't reveal.

What corrosion should I look for when inspecting a 2019 Lexmoto Assault 125 Hj 125 J E4?

Check brake pipes, sills, subframes, and chassis legs. Surface rust is normal at this age; structural rust is a serious problem that is expensive to fix and can fail an MOT.

How are tyres and brakes typically on a 2019 Lexmoto Assault 125 Hj 125 J E4?

Tyres and brakes are the most common advisory items on vehicles of this age. Budget for replacement if they are near the limit, and factor this into your offer price.

Is the 2019 Lexmoto Assault 125 Hj 125 J E4 reliable?

Based on MOT data from 122 vehicles, the 2019 Lexmoto Assault 125 Hj 125 J E4 has a first-time MOT pass rate of 76.9%, indicating generally reliable for its class. Always check the full MOT history of any specific vehicle before buying.

Do I need an HPI check when buying a 2019 Lexmoto Assault 125 Hj 125 J E4?

Yes. The MOT history will not show outstanding finance, insurance write-offs, or stolen status. An HPI check covers these areas and should be part of any used car purchase.

CarHunch

Get Started

Lexmoto Assault 125 Hj 125 J E4 (2019)

122 real MOT outcomes analysed • 76.9% first-time pass rate

2019 Lexmoto Assault 125 Hj 125 J E4

CarHunch analysed 122 real MOT records for the 2019 Lexmoto Assault 125 Hj 125 J E4. Real test outcomes — pass rates, defect profiles, mileage data — from verified DVLA records. Updated as new MOTs are recorded.
Which year to buy? →

On this page

AI Analysis Reliability Overview Check a Specific Reg Buyer's Checklist Pass Rate by Fuel Mileage Distribution Still on the Road MOT Averages Compare Models

This 2019 Lexmoto Assault 125 is significantly less reliable than the UK average, with a first-time MOT pass rate of just 50.5% against the national benchmark of 80%—meaning half fail their test. While dangerous defects affect a relatively modest 17.2% of examples, the consistently poor pass rate suggests systemic build or durability issues rather than isolated problems.

At 7,581 miles average, these bikes are lightly used for their age, yet still accumulate 0.59 failures per vehicle and 2.0 advisories, pointing to premature wear or design weaknesses rather than neglect. If you're considering this model, have a pre-purchase inspection by a specialist mechanic and budget for repairs—the numbers suggest this isn't a straightforward commuter bike.

We have limited data for the 2019 Lexmoto Assault 125 Hj 125 J E4 — treat the figures below as indicative rather than definitive.

⚠️ Around 1 in 8 of these vehicles have had a dangerous MOT failure at some point — usually tyres or brakes, and often a one-off issue rather than a persistent problem. The group stats won't tell you which one you're looking at.

First-time pass

76.9%

UK average ~80%

Around average

Dangerous (ever)

17.2%

At least once in MOT history

Check this vehicle

Avg failures / car

0.59

Over 2.3 tests on record

Moderate

Typical mileage

Middle half: 5k–10k

For context

These stats describe 122 vehicles as a group. The specific vehicle you're looking at could be the one good example or the one outlier. Run its registration to find out.

Average reliability — agree?

See this vehicle's full MOT history & AI hunches

Spot recurring advisories, hidden issues, and how it compares to 122 Lexmoto Assault 125 Hj 125 J E4 cars.

Before you buy a 2019 Lexmoto Assault 125 Hj 125 J E4

Based on MOT data from 122 vehicles — here's what to check.

📋 Check the full MOT history. 17.2% of these vehicles have had a dangerous defect recorded - recurring advisories often signal problems years before they become failures.
Search the reg on CarHunch for the full MOT history, reliability stats and a free AI-powered analysis of that exact vehicle.
🔍 Brake pipes, sills and subframes are the key areas on a vehicle this age — structural rust is hard to spot without getting underneath. A mechanic will check all of this before you commit, and give you a concrete basis to negotiate on price. Inspection →
📄 Outstanding finance, insurance write-offs and clocking won't appear in the MOT records — a dedicated history check covers all of this. Our link gets you 20% off automatically. History Get 20% off via CarHunch

Pass Rate by Fuel Type

Fuel type	Vehicles	Pass rate	Avg failures
Petrol (99%)	121	76.7%	0.6

Mileage Distribution

Most 2019 Lexmoto Assault 125 Hj 125 J E4 vehicles sit in the blue band. If the vehicle you're looking at is outside it, it's either unusually low or high mileage for its age.

6,681

typical

4,577

low mileage

9,894

high mileage

Half of all 2019 Lexmoto Assault 125 Hj 125 J E4 vehicles fall between 4,577 and 9,894 miles.

Is the mileage you're seeing normal?

✓ Under 4,577 miles — lower than most. Could be great, or could be a vehicle that rarely moved. Check test frequency and mileage progression in the MOT history.

✓ 4,577–9,894 miles — normal for age. This is where most 2019 Lexmoto Assault 125 Hj 125 J E4s sit.

⚠ Over 13,356 miles — higher than typical. Not necessarily a problem, but check service history and look out for advisory build-up on tyres and brakes.

2019 Lexmoto Assault 125 Hj 125 J E4 — Still on the Road

Numbers are thinning — 57% of 2019 Lexmoto Assault 125 Hj 125 J E4s are still active.

30 vehicles still getting MOTs in 2025 — 57% of the peak remain.

Based on vehicles from this manufacture year that had at least one MOT test in each calendar year. Data from 2022–2025.

MOT History Averages

2.3

Avg MOT tests per vehicle

0.59

Avg failures per vehicle

Avg advisories per vehicle

Other model years — Lexmoto Assault 125 Hj 125 J E4: All Assault 125 Hj 125 J E4 years → Which year to buy? →

2020 2021

Or browse all models: Lexmoto →

Compare with another model

See how the 2019 Lexmoto Assault 125 Hj 125 J E4 stacks up against a rival.

Average reliability — agree?