Land Rover

Land Rover Range Rover (2009)

3,504 real MOT outcomes analysed • 81.3% first-time pass rate

2009 Land Rover Range Rover

CarHunch analysed 3,504 real MOT records for the 2009 Land Rover Range Rover. Real test outcomes — pass rates, defect profiles, mileage data — from verified DVLA records. Updated as new MOTs are recorded.
Which year to buy? →

On this page
AI Analysis Reliability Overview Check a Specific Reg Buyer's Checklist Pass Rate by Fuel Mileage Distribution Still on the Road MOT Averages Colour Breakdown Compare Models

The 2009 Range Rover passes MOT at 81.3%, just marginally ahead of the UK average, but the real concern is that 42.5% of these vehicles have recorded a dangerous defect at some point—nearly double the typical rate. Both petrol and diesel variants perform similarly (82.3% and 81.2% respectively), so fuel choice isn't a differentiator here.

These Range Rovers average 87,644 miles, which is reasonable for a 15-year-old vehicle, yet they're racking up an average of 3.04 failures and a substantial 21.4 advisories per test. The high advisory count signals chronic wear across multiple systems—suspension, brakes, and seals are typical weak points—so budget for incremental repairs rather than hoping for a trouble-free buy. Before committing, have a pre-purchase inspection specifically flag any history of dangerous defects in the service record.

The 2009 Land Rover Range Rover has a decent first-time pass rate (81.3%), but a higher-than-average share of vehicles have had serious defects recorded — the individual vehicle's history matters a lot here.

⚠️ Over 1 in 5 of these vehicles have had a dangerous MOT failure at some point — usually tyres or brakes, and often a one-off issue rather than a persistent problem. The group stats won't tell you which one you're looking at.
First-time pass
81.3%
UK average ~80%
Around average
Dangerous (ever)
42.5%
At least once in MOT history
Check this vehicle
Avg failures / car
3.04
Over 15.1 tests on record
High
Typical mileage
89k
Middle half: 72k–106k
For context
🔧 Average reliability. Passes at roughly the UK rate — not a standout, not a problem vehicle. Individual history makes all the difference.
🔧 Expect consumable spend. An average of 21.4 advisories per vehicle tells you wear items (tyres, brakes) get flagged regularly. Budget for them — they're not surprises.
🔍 The dangerous defect figure is real. Most are one-off tyre failures or brake issues — not structural problems. But it's exactly why checking the individual vehicle's history is essential, not optional.

These stats describe 3,504 vehicles as a group. The specific vehicle you're looking at could be the one good example or the one outlier. Run its registration to find out.

Watch for defects — worth knowing

See this vehicle's full MOT history & AI hunches

Spot recurring advisories, hidden issues, and how it compares to 3,504 Land Rover Range Rover cars.

UK

Before you buy a 2009 Land Rover Range Rover

Based on MOT data from 3,504 vehicles — here's what to check.

  • 📋 Check the full MOT history. 42.5% of these vehicles have had a dangerous defect recorded - recurring advisories often signal problems years before they become failures.
    Search the reg on CarHunch for the full MOT history, reliability stats and a free AI-powered analysis of that exact vehicle.
  • 🔍 Brake pipes, sills and subframes are the key areas on a vehicle this age — structural rust is hard to spot without getting underneath. A mechanic will check all of this before you commit, and give you a concrete basis to negotiate on price. Inspection ClickMechanic
  • 📄 Outstanding finance, insurance write-offs and clocking won't appear in the MOT records — a dedicated history check covers all of this. Our link gets you 20% off automatically. History carVertical Get 20% off via CarHunch

Pass Rate by Fuel Type

Fuel type Vehicles Pass rate Avg failures
Diesel (89%) 3,131 81.2% 3.09
Petrol (11%) 371 82.3% 2.65

Colour Breakdown

Based on 171,744 Land Rover Range Rover vehicles registered in the UK — across all years. From DVLA registration records.

Black 26.1%
44,748
Blue 20%
34,339
Grey 15.5%
26,616
Green 13.9%
23,901
Silver 8.6%
14,743
Red 6.9%
11,895
White 5%
8,504
Gold 2.5%
4,280
Brown 0.8%
1,338
Bronze 0.4%
672
Beige 0.2%
415
Orange 0.2%
293

Mileage Distribution

Most 2009 Land Rover Range Rover vehicles sit in the blue band. If the vehicle you're looking at is outside it, it's either unusually low or high mileage for its age.

89,108
typical
71,703
low mileage
106,160
high mileage

Half of all 2009 Land Rover Range Rover vehicles fall between 71,703 and 106,160 miles.

Is the mileage you're seeing normal?
Under 71,703 miles — lower than most. Could be great, or could be a vehicle that rarely moved. Check test frequency and mileage progression in the MOT history.
71,703–106,160 miles — normal for age. This is where most 2009 Land Rover Range Rovers sit.
Over 143,316 miles — higher than typical. Not necessarily a problem, but check service history and look out for advisory build-up on tyres and brakes.

2009 Land Rover Range Rover — Still on the Road

Most 2009 Land Rover Range Rovers are still being driven.

2,327 vehicles still getting MOTs in 2025 — 73% of the peak remain.

3,182 2,327 2014 2025

Based on vehicles from this manufacture year that had at least one MOT test in each calendar year. Data from 2014–2025.
* The 2020 dip reflects the government's COVID-19 MOT exemption, which allowed certificates to be extended by six months — fewer tests were conducted that year.

MOT History Averages

15.1
Avg MOT tests per vehicle
3.04
Avg failures per vehicle
21.4
Avg advisories per vehicle
Other model years — Land Rover Range Rover: All Range Rover years → Which year to buy? →
1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Or browse all models: Land Rover →

Land Rover logo

Compare with another model

See how the 2009 Land Rover Range Rover stacks up against a rival.

Watch for defects — worth knowing