Yamaha Yzf 600 R (2000)

135 real MOT outcomes analysed • 81.1% first-time pass rate

2000 Yamaha Yzf 600 R

CarHunch analysed 135 real MOT records for the 2000 Yamaha Yzf 600 R. Real test outcomes — pass rates, defect profiles, mileage data — from verified DVLA records. Updated as new MOTs are recorded.
Which year to buy? →

On this page
AI Analysis Reliability Overview Check a Specific Reg Buyer's Checklist Pass Rate by Fuel Mileage Distribution MOT Averages Compare Models

This 2000 Yamaha YZF 600 R has a first-time MOT pass rate of just 37.4%, nearly half the UK average of 80%, which signals genuine reliability concerns for a bike now in its mid-20s. The good news is that dangerous defects are rare at 4.4%, so safety-critical failures aren't the main issue—instead, expect minor wear items and maintenance gaps to catch most owners out.

The median mileage of 19,250 is relatively low for a 24-year-old sportsbike, suggesting many examples have been stored or ridden sparingly, yet they still fail MOT at high rates, pointing to corrosion and seized components rather than abuse. Before buying, have a trusted mechanic inspect the fuel system, brakes, and electrics in detail, as the 0.47 average failures and 0.9 advisories per vehicle indicate these are the typical problem areas.

We have limited data for the 2000 Yamaha Yzf 600 R — treat the figures below as indicative rather than definitive.

First-time pass
81.1%
UK average ~80%
Around average
Dangerous (ever)
4.4%
At least once in MOT history
Check this vehicle
Avg failures / car
0.47
Over 3.2 tests on record
Low
Typical mileage
19k
Middle half: 12k–25k
For context

These stats describe 135 vehicles as a group. The specific vehicle you're looking at could be the one good example or the one outlier. Run its registration to find out.

Average reliability — agree?

See this vehicle's full MOT history & AI hunches

Spot recurring advisories, hidden issues, and how it compares to 135 Yamaha Yzf 600 R cars.

UK

Before you buy a 2000 Yamaha Yzf 600 R

Based on MOT data from 135 vehicles — here's what to check.

  • 📋 Check the full MOT history. 4.4% of these vehicles have had a dangerous defect recorded - recurring advisories often signal problems years before they become failures.
    Search the reg on CarHunch for the full MOT history, reliability stats and a free AI-powered analysis of that exact vehicle.
  • 🔍 Brake pipes, sills and subframes are the key areas on a vehicle this age — structural rust is hard to spot without getting underneath. A mechanic will check all of this before you commit, and give you a concrete basis to negotiate on price. Inspection ClickMechanic
  • 📄 Outstanding finance, insurance write-offs and clocking won't appear in the MOT records — a dedicated history check covers all of this. Our link gets you 20% off automatically. History carVertical Get 20% off via CarHunch

Pass Rate by Fuel Type

Fuel type Vehicles Pass rate Avg failures
Petrol (96%) 129 80.8% 0.48

Mileage Distribution

Most 2000 Yamaha Yzf 600 R vehicles sit in the blue band. If the vehicle you're looking at is outside it, it's either unusually low or high mileage for its age.

19,250
typical
11,856
low mileage
25,432
high mileage

Half of all 2000 Yamaha Yzf 600 R vehicles fall between 11,856 and 25,432 miles.

Is the mileage you're seeing normal?
Under 11,856 miles — lower than most. Could be great, or could be a vehicle that rarely moved. Check test frequency and mileage progression in the MOT history.
11,856–25,432 miles — normal for age. This is where most 2000 Yamaha Yzf 600 Rs sit.
Over 34,333 miles — higher than typical. Not necessarily a problem, but check service history and look out for advisory build-up on tyres and brakes.

MOT History Averages

3.2
Avg MOT tests per vehicle
0.47
Avg failures per vehicle
0.9
Avg advisories per vehicle
Other model years — Yamaha Yzf 600 R: All Yzf 600 R years → Which year to buy? →
1997 1998 1999 2001

Or browse all models: Yamaha →

Compare with another model

See how the 2000 Yamaha Yzf 600 R stacks up against a rival.

Average reliability — agree?