Yamaha Yq100 (2003)

278 real MOT outcomes analysed • 76.2% first-time pass rate

2003 Yamaha Yq100

CarHunch analysed 278 real MOT records for the 2003 Yamaha Yq100. Real test outcomes — pass rates, defect profiles, mileage data — from verified DVLA records. Updated as new MOTs are recorded.
Which year to buy? →

On this page
AI Analysis Reliability Overview Common Issues Check a Specific Reg Buyer's Checklist Mileage Distribution Still on the Road MOT Averages Colour Breakdown Compare Models

The 2003 Yamaha YQ100 has a 76.2% first-time pass rate, slightly below the UK average of 80%, which suggests moderate reliability concerns for a scooter of this age. Dangerous defects have been recorded in 15.5% of tested vehicles—not alarmingly high, but worth factoring into your inspection checklist before purchase.

These scooters show relatively low mileage at 10,995 miles median, which is healthy for their age and suggests many were either lightly used or well-maintained by previous owners. Expect around 1.6 failures and 3.3 advisories per test cycle, meaning routine maintenance and worn consumables are the norm—have a pre-purchase inspection focus on brakes, cables, and corrosion before committing.

We have limited data for the 2003 Yamaha Yq100 — treat the figures below as indicative rather than definitive.

⚠️ Around 1 in 8 of these vehicles have had a dangerous MOT failure at some point — usually tyres or brakes, and often a one-off issue rather than a persistent problem. The group stats won't tell you which one you're looking at.
First-time pass
76.2%
UK average ~80%
Around average
Dangerous (ever)
15.5%
At least once in MOT history
Check this vehicle
Avg failures / car
1.57
Over 5.8 tests on record
High
Typical mileage
11k
Middle half: 7k–16k
For context

These stats describe 278 vehicles as a group. The specific vehicle you're looking at could be the one good example or the one outlier. Run its registration to find out.

Average reliability — agree?

What tends to go wrong

Across 278 vehicles — figures show how many had each issue flagged at least once in their MOT history.

Brake wear 34.8%
Front Stop lamp does not illuminate immediately a brake applies · Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick · Front Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit · …
Ask the seller when brakes were last serviced. If they don't know, factor in the cost.
Tyre wear 23.9%
Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit · Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit · Rear Tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm
Budget for a full set — on a vehicle this age, tyres are expected consumables. An inspection will confirm how much is left.
Lighting 18.5%
Headlamp at least one does not illuminate on dipped beam · Headlamp aim too high
Usually cheap to fix. Worth confirming all lights work before collecting.
Suspension & steering 17.4%
Nearside Front shock absorber has light misting of stanchion · Offside Front shock absorber has light misting of stanchion · Front shock absorber has light misting of stanchion
Harder to spot without a ramp — this is a good reason to book a pre-purchase inspection.
Exhaust & emissions 14.1%
Exhaust is leaking but is not excessively noisey · Exhaust is leaking and excessively noisey

Data covers a 3-year window centred on 2003.

See this vehicle's full MOT history & AI hunches

Spot recurring advisories, hidden issues, and how it compares to 278 Yamaha Yq100 cars.

UK

Before you buy a 2003 Yamaha Yq100

Based on MOT data from 278 vehicles — here's what to check.

  • 📋 Check the full MOT history. 15.5% of these vehicles have had a dangerous defect recorded - recurring advisories often signal problems years before they become failures.
    Search the reg on CarHunch for the full MOT history, reliability stats and a free AI-powered analysis of that exact vehicle.
  • 🔍 Brake pipes, sills and subframes are the key areas on a vehicle this age — structural rust is hard to spot without getting underneath. A mechanic will check all of this before you commit, and give you a concrete basis to negotiate on price. Inspection ClickMechanic
  • 📄 Outstanding finance, insurance write-offs and clocking won't appear in the MOT records — a dedicated history check covers all of this. Our link gets you 20% off automatically. History carVertical Get 20% off via CarHunch

Colour Breakdown

Based on 1,661 Yamaha Yq100 vehicles registered in the UK — across all years. From DVLA registration records.

Blue 42.5%
706
Red 34.6%
575
Black 18.2%
302
White 1.7%
29
Orange 1%
17
Green 1%
16
Yellow 0.4%
6
Grey 0.3%
5
Multi-colour 0.3%
5

Mileage Distribution

Most 2003 Yamaha Yq100 vehicles sit in the blue band. If the vehicle you're looking at is outside it, it's either unusually low or high mileage for its age.

10,995
typical
6,624
low mileage
16,266
high mileage

Half of all 2003 Yamaha Yq100 vehicles fall between 6,624 and 16,266 miles.

Is the mileage you're seeing normal?
Under 6,624 miles — lower than most. Could be great, or could be a vehicle that rarely moved. Check test frequency and mileage progression in the MOT history.
6,624–16,266 miles — normal for age. This is where most 2003 Yamaha Yq100s sit.
Over 21,959 miles — higher than typical. Not necessarily a problem, but check service history and look out for advisory build-up on tyres and brakes.

2003 Yamaha Yq100 — Still on the Road

Numbers are thinning — 23% of 2003 Yamaha Yq100s are still active.

Numbers are declining — 15 vehicles still getting MOTs in 2021 (23% of peak).

66 15 2014 2021

Based on vehicles from this manufacture year that had at least one MOT test in each calendar year. Data from 2014–2021.
* The 2020 dip reflects the government's COVID-19 MOT exemption, which allowed certificates to be extended by six months — fewer tests were conducted that year.

MOT History Averages

5.8
Avg MOT tests per vehicle
1.57
Avg failures per vehicle
3.3
Avg advisories per vehicle
Other model years — Yamaha Yq100: All Yq100 years → Which year to buy? →
2000 2001 2002 2004

Or browse all models: Yamaha →

Compare with another model

See how the 2003 Yamaha Yq100 stacks up against a rival.

Average reliability — agree?