Yamaha Yq 100 (2003)

231 real MOT outcomes analysed • 80.7% first-time pass rate

2003 Yamaha Yq 100

CarHunch analysed 231 real MOT records for the 2003 Yamaha Yq 100. Real test outcomes — pass rates, defect profiles, mileage data — from verified DVLA records. Updated as new MOTs are recorded.
Which year to buy? →

On this page
AI Analysis Reliability Overview Check a Specific Reg Buyer's Checklist Mileage Distribution MOT Averages Colour Breakdown Compare Models

The 2003 Yamaha YQ 100 is a genuinely poor performer on its first MOT attempt, with only 18.9% passing outright compared to the UK average of 80% — this is a scooter that will almost certainly need repairs before it clears the test. The dangerous defect rate is mercifully low at 0.9%, so safety isn't the primary concern; instead, expect widespread wear across brakes, lights, and emissions systems.

At 13,030 miles average, these machines have covered a reasonable distance for their age, yet they're still generating 0.18 failures and 0.2 advisories per vehicle on test. If you're considering one, factor in the cost of a full pre-purchase inspection and budget for at least one round of repairs before it will pass — buying one in MOT failure is the only sensible approach.

We have limited data for the 2003 Yamaha Yq 100 — treat the figures below as indicative rather than definitive.

First-time pass
80.7%
UK average ~80%
Around average
Dangerous (ever)
0.9%
At least once in MOT history
Check this vehicle
Avg failures / car
0.18
Over 1.6 tests on record
Low
Typical mileage
11k
Middle half: 8k–17k
For context

These stats describe 231 vehicles as a group. The specific vehicle you're looking at could be the one good example or the one outlier. Run its registration to find out.

Average reliability — agree?

See this vehicle's full MOT history & AI hunches

Spot recurring advisories, hidden issues, and how it compares to 231 Yamaha Yq 100 cars.

UK

Before you buy a 2003 Yamaha Yq 100

Based on MOT data from 231 vehicles — here's what to check.

  • 📋 Check the full MOT history. 0.9% of these vehicles have had a dangerous defect recorded - recurring advisories often signal problems years before they become failures.
    Search the reg on CarHunch for the full MOT history, reliability stats and a free AI-powered analysis of that exact vehicle.
  • 🔍 Brake pipes, sills and subframes are the key areas on a vehicle this age — structural rust is hard to spot without getting underneath. A mechanic will check all of this before you commit, and give you a concrete basis to negotiate on price. Inspection ClickMechanic
  • 📄 Outstanding finance, insurance write-offs and clocking won't appear in the MOT records — a dedicated history check covers all of this. Our link gets you 20% off automatically. History carVertical Get 20% off via CarHunch

Colour Breakdown

Based on 1,996 Yamaha Yq 100 vehicles registered in the UK — across all years. From DVLA registration records.

Blue 46.1%
920
Red 39.9%
796
Black 13.4%
268
Silver 0.4%
7
Yellow 0.3%
5

Mileage Distribution

Most 2003 Yamaha Yq 100 vehicles sit in the blue band. If the vehicle you're looking at is outside it, it's either unusually low or high mileage for its age.

11,492
typical
7,548
low mileage
16,531
high mileage

Half of all 2003 Yamaha Yq 100 vehicles fall between 7,548 and 16,531 miles.

Is the mileage you're seeing normal?
Under 7,548 miles — lower than most. Could be great, or could be a vehicle that rarely moved. Check test frequency and mileage progression in the MOT history.
7,548–16,531 miles — normal for age. This is where most 2003 Yamaha Yq 100s sit.
Over 22,316 miles — higher than typical. Not necessarily a problem, but check service history and look out for advisory build-up on tyres and brakes.

MOT History Averages

1.6
Avg MOT tests per vehicle
0.18
Avg failures per vehicle
0.2
Avg advisories per vehicle
Other model years — Yamaha Yq 100: All Yq 100 years → Which year to buy? →
2000 2001 2002 2004

Or browse all models: Yamaha →

Compare with another model

See how the 2003 Yamaha Yq 100 stacks up against a rival.

Average reliability — agree?