Yamaha Yn 100 (2001)

292 real MOT outcomes analysed • 76.2% first-time pass rate

2001 Yamaha Yn 100

CarHunch analysed 292 real MOT records for the 2001 Yamaha Yn 100. Real test outcomes — pass rates, defect profiles, mileage data — from verified DVLA records. Updated as new MOTs are recorded.
Which year to buy? →

On this page
AI Analysis Reliability Overview Check a Specific Reg Buyer's Checklist Mileage Distribution MOT Averages Colour Breakdown Compare Models

This 2001 Yamaha YN 100 is a reliability concern: only 15.9% pass their MOT first time, dramatically below the UK average of 80%, suggesting widespread mechanical issues across the model year. The dangerous defect rate of 2.7% is mercifully low, but the root problem is simply that these scooters are ageing poorly overall.

At nearly 8,330 miles on average, these machines are running well within typical mileage for a 23-year-old scooter, yet still failing MOTs at alarming rates—indicating wear and degradation rather than just high usage. With an average of 0.22 failures and 0.2 advisories per vehicle, expect multiple defects to emerge even on apparently low-mileage examples; budget for significant remedial work or inspect any purchase by a qualified mechanic before committing.

We have limited data for the 2001 Yamaha Yn 100 — treat the figures below as indicative rather than definitive.

First-time pass
76.2%
UK average ~80%
Around average
Dangerous (ever)
2.7%
At least once in MOT history
Check this vehicle
Avg failures / car
0.22
Over 1.6 tests on record
Low
Typical mileage
7k
Middle half: 5k–11k
For context

These stats describe 292 vehicles as a group. The specific vehicle you're looking at could be the one good example or the one outlier. Run its registration to find out.

Average reliability — agree?

See this vehicle's full MOT history & AI hunches

Spot recurring advisories, hidden issues, and how it compares to 292 Yamaha Yn 100 cars.

UK

Before you buy a 2001 Yamaha Yn 100

Based on MOT data from 292 vehicles — here's what to check.

  • 📋 Check the full MOT history. 2.7% of these vehicles have had a dangerous defect recorded - recurring advisories often signal problems years before they become failures.
    Search the reg on CarHunch for the full MOT history, reliability stats and a free AI-powered analysis of that exact vehicle.
  • 🔍 Brake pipes, sills and subframes are the key areas on a vehicle this age — structural rust is hard to spot without getting underneath. A mechanic will check all of this before you commit, and give you a concrete basis to negotiate on price. Inspection ClickMechanic
  • 📄 Outstanding finance, insurance write-offs and clocking won't appear in the MOT records — a dedicated history check covers all of this. Our link gets you 20% off automatically. History carVertical Get 20% off via CarHunch

Colour Breakdown

Based on 893 Yamaha Yn 100 vehicles registered in the UK — across all years. From DVLA registration records.

Silver 52.1%
465
Red 27.3%
244
Blue 19.4%
173
Black 1.2%
11

Mileage Distribution

Most 2001 Yamaha Yn 100 vehicles sit in the blue band. If the vehicle you're looking at is outside it, it's either unusually low or high mileage for its age.

7,278
typical
5,012
low mileage
11,057
high mileage

Half of all 2001 Yamaha Yn 100 vehicles fall between 5,012 and 11,057 miles.

Is the mileage you're seeing normal?
Under 5,012 miles — lower than most. Could be great, or could be a vehicle that rarely moved. Check test frequency and mileage progression in the MOT history.
5,012–11,057 miles — normal for age. This is where most 2001 Yamaha Yn 100s sit.
Over 14,926 miles — higher than typical. Not necessarily a problem, but check service history and look out for advisory build-up on tyres and brakes.

MOT History Averages

1.6
Avg MOT tests per vehicle
0.22
Avg failures per vehicle
0.2
Avg advisories per vehicle
Other model years — Yamaha Yn 100: All Yn 100 years → Which year to buy? →
2000 2002

Or browse all models: Yamaha →

Compare with another model

See how the 2001 Yamaha Yn 100 stacks up against a rival.

Average reliability — agree?