Yamaha Xv750 (1995)

237 real MOT outcomes analysed • 86.8% first-time pass rate

1995 Yamaha Xv750

CarHunch analysed 237 real MOT records for the 1995 Yamaha Xv750. Real test outcomes — pass rates, defect profiles, mileage data — from verified DVLA records. Updated as new MOTs are recorded.
Which year to buy? →

On this page
AI Analysis Reliability Overview Common Issues Check a Specific Reg Buyer's Checklist Mileage Distribution Still on the Road MOT Averages Colour Breakdown Compare Models

The 1995 Yamaha XV750 passes its MOT first time at 86.8%, comfortably above the UK average of 80%, suggesting these bikes are generally well-maintained and reliable. Dangerous defects show up in 14.3% of examples—not alarming, but worth a pre-purchase inspection to catch corrosion or brake issues early.

At nearly 19,300 miles on average for a nearly 30-year-old machine, these are relatively low-mileage survivors, which tracks with their above-average pass rate. The typical bike racks up 1.65 failures and 5 advisories per test, pointing to minor wear items rather than structural problems—budget for routine maintenance but don't expect major shocks if you're buying one with full service history.

We have limited data for the 1995 Yamaha Xv750 — treat the figures below as indicative rather than definitive.

⚠️ Around 1 in 8 of these vehicles have had a dangerous MOT failure at some point — usually tyres or brakes, and often a one-off issue rather than a persistent problem. The group stats won't tell you which one you're looking at.
First-time pass
86.8%
UK average ~80%
Around average
Dangerous (ever)
14.4%
At least once in MOT history
Check this vehicle
Avg failures / car
1.65
Over 11.9 tests on record
High
Typical mileage
18k
Middle half: 11k–24k
For context

These stats describe 237 vehicles as a group. The specific vehicle you're looking at could be the one good example or the one outlier. Run its registration to find out.

A solid choice — agree?

What tends to go wrong

Across 237 vehicles — figures show how many had each issue flagged at least once in their MOT history.

Exhaust & emissions 85.1%
Exhaust noisy · Exhaust is leaking but is not excessively noisey · Exhaust is leaking and excessively noisey
Tyre wear 48.9%
Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit · Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit · Rear Tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm · …
Budget for a full set — on a vehicle this age, tyres are expected consumables. An inspection will confirm how much is left.
Suspension & steering 10.2%
Offside Front shock absorber has light misting of stanchion · Nearside Front shock absorber has light misting of stanchion · Front wheel bearings have slight free play · …
Harder to spot without a ramp — this is a good reason to book a pre-purchase inspection.
Brake wear 9.4%
Front Roller brake test indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort · Front Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit
Ask the seller when brakes were last serviced. If they don't know, factor in the cost.
Lighting 9.4%
Headlamp aim too high · Headlamp aim too low · Exhaust slightly deteriorated
Usually cheap to fix. Worth confirming all lights work before collecting.

Data covers a 3-year window centred on 1995.

See this vehicle's full MOT history & AI hunches

Spot recurring advisories, hidden issues, and how it compares to 237 Yamaha Xv750 cars.

UK

Before you buy a 1995 Yamaha Xv750

Based on MOT data from 237 vehicles — here's what to check.

  • 📋 Check the full MOT history. 14.4% of these vehicles have had a dangerous defect recorded - recurring advisories often signal problems years before they become failures.
    Search the reg on CarHunch for the full MOT history, reliability stats and a free AI-powered analysis of that exact vehicle.
  • 🔍 Brake pipes, sills and subframes are the key areas on a vehicle this age — structural rust is hard to spot without getting underneath. A mechanic will check all of this before you commit, and give you a concrete basis to negotiate on price. Inspection ClickMechanic
  • 📄 Outstanding finance, insurance write-offs and clocking won't appear in the MOT records — a dedicated history check covers all of this. Our link gets you 20% off automatically. History carVertical Get 20% off via CarHunch

Colour Breakdown

Based on 1,629 Yamaha Xv750 vehicles registered in the UK — across all years. From DVLA registration records.

Black 32.1%
523
Blue 24.9%
405
Red 22%
359
Green 8.2%
134
Maroon 3.7%
60
Purple 2.5%
40
Silver 2.3%
38
Brown 1.4%
23
Grey 1%
16
Orange 0.8%
13
White 0.6%
9
Yellow 0.6%
9

Mileage Distribution

Most 1995 Yamaha Xv750 vehicles sit in the blue band. If the vehicle you're looking at is outside it, it's either unusually low or high mileage for its age.

17,545
typical
11,499
low mileage
24,088
high mileage

Half of all 1995 Yamaha Xv750 vehicles fall between 11,499 and 24,088 miles.

Is the mileage you're seeing normal?
Under 11,499 miles — lower than most. Could be great, or could be a vehicle that rarely moved. Check test frequency and mileage progression in the MOT history.
11,499–24,088 miles — normal for age. This is where most 1995 Yamaha Xv750s sit.
Over 32,518 miles — higher than typical. Not necessarily a problem, but check service history and look out for advisory build-up on tyres and brakes.

1995 Yamaha Xv750 — Still on the Road

Numbers are thinning — 64% of 1995 Yamaha Xv750s are still active.

79 vehicles still getting MOTs in 2025 — 64% of the peak remain.

123 79 2014 2025

Based on vehicles from this manufacture year that had at least one MOT test in each calendar year. Data from 2014–2025.
* The 2020 dip reflects the government's COVID-19 MOT exemption, which allowed certificates to be extended by six months — fewer tests were conducted that year.

MOT History Averages

11.9
Avg MOT tests per vehicle
1.65
Avg failures per vehicle
5
Avg advisories per vehicle
Other model years — Yamaha Xv750: All Xv750 years → Which year to buy? →
1981 1982 1992 1993 1994 1996 1997

Or browse all models: Yamaha →

Compare with another model

See how the 1995 Yamaha Xv750 stacks up against a rival.

A solid choice — agree?