Volvo

Volvo Xc60 (2009)

3,855 real MOT outcomes analysed • 80.4% first-time pass rate

2009 Volvo Xc60

CarHunch analysed 3,855 real MOT records for the 2009 Volvo Xc60. Real test outcomes — pass rates, defect profiles, mileage data — from verified DVLA records. Updated as new MOTs are recorded.
Which year to buy? →

On this page
AI Analysis Reliability Overview Common Issues Check a Specific Reg Buyer's Checklist Pass Rate by Fuel Mileage Distribution Still on the Road MOT Averages Colour Breakdown Compare Models

The 2009 Volvo XC60 matches the UK average with an 80.4% first-time pass rate, but there's a serious concern: nearly 40% of these vehicles have recorded a dangerous defect at some point, well above typical thresholds and a genuine red flag for prospective buyers. This is a reliability issue that deserves investigation before purchase.

At nearly 93,000 miles on average, these XC60s show typical wear for their age, but the 3.27 failures per vehicle and particularly the 18.5 advisories per vehicle suggest mounting maintenance needs as they age. Before buying one, get a pre-purchase inspection focused on suspension, electrical systems, and brake components—the advisory pattern indicates these are where costs tend to accumulate.

The 2009 Volvo Xc60 has a decent first-time pass rate (80.4%), but a higher-than-average share of vehicles have had serious defects recorded — the individual vehicle's history matters a lot here.

⚠️ Over 1 in 5 of these vehicles have had a dangerous MOT failure at some point — usually tyres or brakes, and often a one-off issue rather than a persistent problem. The group stats won't tell you which one you're looking at.
First-time pass
80.4%
UK average ~80%
Around average
Dangerous (ever)
39.9%
At least once in MOT history
Check this vehicle
Avg failures / car
3.27
Over 15.8 tests on record
High
Typical mileage
91k
Middle half: 74k–109k
For context
🔧 Average reliability. Passes at roughly the UK rate — not a standout, not a problem vehicle. Individual history makes all the difference.
🔧 Expect consumable spend. An average of 18.5 advisories per vehicle tells you wear items (tyres, brakes) get flagged regularly. Budget for them — they're not surprises.
🔍 The dangerous defect figure is real. Most are one-off tyre failures or brake issues — not structural problems. But it's exactly why checking the individual vehicle's history is essential, not optional.

These stats describe 3,855 vehicles as a group. The specific vehicle you're looking at could be the one good example or the one outlier. Run its registration to find out.

Watch for defects — worth knowing

What tends to go wrong

Across 3,855 vehicles — figures show how many had each issue flagged at least once in their MOT history.

Brake wear 64.6%
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin · Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin
Ask the seller when brakes were last serviced. If they don't know, factor in the cost.
Tyre wear 53.8%
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge · Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge · Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit · …
Budget for a full set — on a vehicle this age, tyres are expected consumables. An inspection will confirm how much is left.
Other issues 52.5%
Under-trays fitted obscuring some underside components · Engine covers fitted obscuring some components in the engine bay · Nearside Rear Child Seat fitted not allowing full inspection of adult belt · …
Suspension & steering 20.2%
Offside Rear Coil spring corroded · Nearside Rear Coil spring corroded
Harder to spot without a ramp — this is a good reason to book a pre-purchase inspection.

Data covers a 3-year window centred on 2009.

See this vehicle's full MOT history & AI hunches

Spot recurring advisories, hidden issues, and how it compares to 3,855 Volvo Xc60 cars.

UK

Before you buy a 2009 Volvo Xc60

Based on MOT data from 3,855 vehicles — here's what to check.

  • 📋 Check the full MOT history. 39.9% of these vehicles have had a dangerous defect recorded - recurring advisories often signal problems years before they become failures.
    Search the reg on CarHunch for the full MOT history, reliability stats and a free AI-powered analysis of that exact vehicle.
  • 🔍 Brake pipes, sills and subframes are the key areas on a vehicle this age — structural rust is hard to spot without getting underneath. A mechanic will check all of this before you commit, and give you a concrete basis to negotiate on price. Inspection ClickMechanic
  • 📄 Outstanding finance, insurance write-offs and clocking won't appear in the MOT records — a dedicated history check covers all of this. Our link gets you 20% off automatically. History carVertical Get 20% off via CarHunch

Pass Rate by Fuel Type

Fuel type Vehicles Pass rate Avg failures
Diesel (98%) 3,781 80.4% 3.29
Petrol (2%) 73 81.4% 2.12

Colour Breakdown

Based on 96,841 Volvo Xc60 vehicles registered in the UK — across all years. From DVLA registration records.

Grey 24.3%
23,528
Black 24.3%
23,513
Blue 15.3%
14,864
White 12.9%
12,445
Silver 11.2%
10,884
Red 6.1%
5,933
Gold 3.1%
3,034
Bronze 2.5%
2,452
Green 0.1%
94
Brown 0.1%
75
Beige 0%
19

Mileage Distribution

Most 2009 Volvo Xc60 vehicles sit in the blue band. If the vehicle you're looking at is outside it, it's either unusually low or high mileage for its age.

90,687
typical
73,834
low mileage
109,481
high mileage

Half of all 2009 Volvo Xc60 vehicles fall between 73,834 and 109,481 miles.

Is the mileage you're seeing normal?
Under 73,834 miles — lower than most. Could be great, or could be a vehicle that rarely moved. Check test frequency and mileage progression in the MOT history.
73,834–109,481 miles — normal for age. This is where most 2009 Volvo Xc60s sit.
Over 147,799 miles — higher than typical. Not necessarily a problem, but check service history and look out for advisory build-up on tyres and brakes.

2009 Volvo Xc60 — Still on the Road

Most 2009 Volvo Xc60s are still being driven.

2,656 vehicles still getting MOTs in 2025 — 73% of the peak remain.

3,640 2,656 2014 2025

Based on vehicles from this manufacture year that had at least one MOT test in each calendar year. Data from 2014–2025.
* The 2020 dip reflects the government's COVID-19 MOT exemption, which allowed certificates to be extended by six months — fewer tests were conducted that year.

MOT History Averages

15.8
Avg MOT tests per vehicle
3.27
Avg failures per vehicle
18.5
Avg advisories per vehicle
Other model years — Volvo Xc60: All Xc60 years → Which year to buy? →
2008 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Or browse all models: Volvo →

Volvo logo

Compare with another model

See how the 2009 Volvo Xc60 stacks up against a rival.

Watch for defects — worth knowing