Suzuki

Suzuki Gsx1400 (2007)

287 real MOT outcomes analysed • 92% first-time pass rate

2007 Suzuki Gsx1400

CarHunch analysed 287 real MOT records for the 2007 Suzuki Gsx1400. Real test outcomes — pass rates, defect profiles, mileage data — from verified DVLA records. Updated as new MOTs are recorded.
Which year to buy? →

On this page
AI Analysis Reliability Overview Common Issues Check a Specific Reg Buyer's Checklist Mileage Distribution Still on the Road MOT Averages Colour Breakdown Compare Models

This 2007 Suzuki GSX1400 is a strong performer by MOT standards, with a 92% first-time pass rate that sits well above the UK average of 80%, and only 11.8% of vehicles ever showing a dangerous defect—a reassuring sign for a bike of this age. The low failure count (1.15 per vehicle on average) suggests these bikes are built to last and maintain themselves reasonably well.

The median mileage of just over 12,000 miles is notably low for a 17-year-old sports bike, indicating these are largely kept as weekend toys rather than daily commuters, which correlates with their solid MOT results. However, the high advisory rate of 4.3 per vehicle means you should expect minor wear items to need attention; when shopping, ask the seller for recent service history and factor in routine maintenance costs.

We have limited data for the 2007 Suzuki Gsx1400 — treat the figures below as indicative rather than definitive.

⚠️ About 1 in 12 of these vehicles have had a dangerous MOT failure at some point — usually tyres or brakes, and often a one-off issue rather than a persistent problem. The group stats won't tell you which one you're looking at.
First-time pass
92%
UK average ~80%
Better than average
Dangerous (ever)
11.9%
At least once in MOT history
Check this vehicle
Avg failures / car
1.15
Over 13.5 tests on record
High
Typical mileage
12k
Middle half: 7k–18k
For context

These stats describe 287 vehicles as a group. The specific vehicle you're looking at could be the one good example or the one outlier. Run its registration to find out.

A solid choice — agree?

What tends to go wrong

Across 287 vehicles — figures show how many had each issue flagged at least once in their MOT history.

Exhaust & emissions 79.2%
Exhaust noisy
Tyre wear 49.7%
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit · Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit · Rear Tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm · …
Budget for a full set — on a vehicle this age, tyres are expected consumables. An inspection will confirm how much is left.
Lighting 25.9%
Headlamp aim too low · Drive chain slightly loose · Headlamp masks/converters fitted
Usually cheap to fix. Worth confirming all lights work before collecting.
Brake wear 25.4%
Front Roller brake test indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort · Front Brake indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort · Rear Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit · …
Ask the seller when brakes were last serviced. If they don't know, factor in the cost.
Suspension & steering 4.8%
Nearside Front Shock absorber has a light misting of oil
Harder to spot without a ramp — this is a good reason to book a pre-purchase inspection.

Data covers a 3-year window centred on 2007.

See this vehicle's full MOT history & AI hunches

Spot recurring advisories, hidden issues, and how it compares to 287 Suzuki Gsx1400 cars.

UK

Before you buy a 2007 Suzuki Gsx1400

Based on MOT data from 287 vehicles — here's what to check.

  • 📋 Check the full MOT history. 11.9% of these vehicles have had a dangerous defect recorded - recurring advisories often signal problems years before they become failures.
    Search the reg on CarHunch for the full MOT history, reliability stats and a free AI-powered analysis of that exact vehicle.
  • 🔍 Brake pipes, sills and subframes are the key areas on a vehicle this age — structural rust is hard to spot without getting underneath. A mechanic will check all of this before you commit, and give you a concrete basis to negotiate on price. Inspection ClickMechanic
  • 📄 Outstanding finance, insurance write-offs and clocking won't appear in the MOT records — a dedicated history check covers all of this. Our link gets you 20% off automatically. History carVertical Get 20% off via CarHunch

Colour Breakdown

Based on 4,341 Suzuki Gsx1400 vehicles registered in the UK — across all years. From DVLA registration records.

White 41.9%
1,817
Blue 37.6%
1,632
Black 9.3%
403
Red 5.2%
224
Silver 5%
217
Orange 0.3%
12
Yellow 0.2%
9
Grey 0.2%
8
Green 0.2%
7
Multi-colour 0.2%
7
Purple 0.1%
5

Mileage Distribution

Most 2007 Suzuki Gsx1400 vehicles sit in the blue band. If the vehicle you're looking at is outside it, it's either unusually low or high mileage for its age.

12,189
typical
7,265
low mileage
18,136
high mileage

Half of all 2007 Suzuki Gsx1400 vehicles fall between 7,265 and 18,136 miles.

Is the mileage you're seeing normal?
Under 7,265 miles — lower than most. Could be great, or could be a vehicle that rarely moved. Check test frequency and mileage progression in the MOT history.
7,265–18,136 miles — normal for age. This is where most 2007 Suzuki Gsx1400s sit.
Over 24,483 miles — higher than typical. Not necessarily a problem, but check service history and look out for advisory build-up on tyres and brakes.

2007 Suzuki Gsx1400 — Still on the Road

Most 2007 Suzuki Gsx1400s are still being driven.

Strong survival — 190 vehicles still getting MOTs in 2025, 80% of the peak.

238 190 2014 2025

Based on vehicles from this manufacture year that had at least one MOT test in each calendar year. Data from 2014–2025.
* The 2020 dip reflects the government's COVID-19 MOT exemption, which allowed certificates to be extended by six months — fewer tests were conducted that year.

MOT History Averages

13.5
Avg MOT tests per vehicle
1.15
Avg failures per vehicle
4.3
Avg advisories per vehicle
Other model years — Suzuki Gsx1400: All Gsx1400 years → Which year to buy? →
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2008

Or browse all models: Suzuki →

Suzuki logo

Compare with another model

See how the 2007 Suzuki Gsx1400 stacks up against a rival.

A solid choice — agree?