Subaru

Subaru Impreza Turbo 2000 AWD (1997)

454 real MOT outcomes analysed • 76.8% first-time pass rate

1997 Subaru Impreza Turbo 2000 AWD

CarHunch analysed 454 real MOT records for the 1997 Subaru Impreza Turbo 2000 AWD. Real test outcomes — pass rates, defect profiles, mileage data — from verified DVLA records. Updated as new MOTs are recorded.
Which year to buy? →

On this page
Reliability Overview Check a Specific Reg Buyer's Checklist Pass Rate by Fuel Mileage Distribution MOT Averages Colour Breakdown Compare Models

Limited data for this trim variant. The DVLA records this vehicle under a specific trim-level name with only 454 vehicles on record — some statistics may not be reliable at this sample size.

See the full 1997 SUBARU IMPREZA (4,504 vehicles)

The 1997 Subaru Impreza Turbo 2000 AWD passes its MOT first time at roughly the UK average rate (76.8%) — solid but worth checking this vehicle's history carefully.

First-time pass
76.8%
UK average ~80%
Around average
Dangerous (ever)
2.4%
At least once in MOT history
Check this vehicle
Avg failures / car
0.44
Over 2.2 tests on record
Low
Typical mileage
99k
Middle half: 86k–117k
For context
🔧 Average reliability. Passes at roughly the UK rate — not a standout, not a problem vehicle. Individual history makes all the difference.

These stats describe 454 vehicles as a group. The specific vehicle you're looking at could be the one good example or the one outlier. Run its registration to find out.

Average reliability — agree?

See this vehicle's full MOT history & AI hunches

Spot recurring advisories, hidden issues, and how it compares to 454 Subaru Impreza Turbo 2000 AWD cars.

UK

Before you buy a 1997 Subaru Impreza Turbo 2000 AWD

Based on MOT data from 454 vehicles — here's what to check.

  • 📋 Check the full MOT history. 2.4% of these vehicles have had a dangerous defect recorded - recurring advisories often signal problems years before they become failures.
    Search the reg on CarHunch for the full MOT history, reliability stats and a free AI-powered analysis of that exact vehicle.
  • 🔍 Brake pipes, sills and subframes are the key areas on a vehicle this age — structural rust is hard to spot without getting underneath. A mechanic will check all of this before you commit, and give you a concrete basis to negotiate on price. Inspection ClickMechanic
  • 📄 Outstanding finance, insurance write-offs and clocking won't appear in the MOT records — a dedicated history check covers all of this. Our link gets you 20% off automatically. History carVertical Get 20% off via CarHunch

Pass Rate by Fuel Type

Fuel type Vehicles Pass rate Avg failures
Petrol (98%) 445 76.8% 0.43

Colour Breakdown

Based on 2,080 Subaru Impreza Turbo 2000 AWD vehicles registered in the UK — across all years. From DVLA registration records.

Blue 34.3%
713
Silver 26.4%
549
Green 22.2%
462
Red 12%
250
White 4.6%
95
Black 0.5%
11

Mileage Distribution

Most 1997 Subaru Impreza Turbo 2000 AWD vehicles sit in the blue band. If the vehicle you're looking at is outside it, it's either unusually low or high mileage for its age.

98,765
typical
86,034
low mileage
117,276
high mileage

Half of all 1997 Subaru Impreza Turbo 2000 AWD vehicles fall between 86,034 and 117,276 miles.

Is the mileage you're seeing normal?
Under 86,034 miles — lower than most. Could be great, or could be a vehicle that rarely moved. Check test frequency and mileage progression in the MOT history.
86,034–117,276 miles — normal for age. This is where most 1997 Subaru Impreza Turbo 2000 AWDs sit.
Over 158,322 miles — higher than typical. Not necessarily a problem, but check service history and look out for advisory build-up on tyres and brakes.

MOT History Averages

2.2
Avg MOT tests per vehicle
0.44
Avg failures per vehicle
1.3
Avg advisories per vehicle
Other model years — Subaru Impreza Turbo 2000 AWD: All Impreza Turbo 2000 AWD years → Which year to buy? →
1998 1999 2000

Or browse all models: Subaru →

Subaru logo

Compare with another model

See how the 1997 Subaru Impreza Turbo 2000 AWD stacks up against a rival.

Average reliability — agree?