Skoda Fabia (2014)
2014 Skoda Fabia
CarHunch analysed 15,548 real MOT records for the 2014 Skoda Fabia. This breakdown of actual test outcomes — pass rates, defect profiles, mileage data — isn't published anywhere else.
The 2014 Skoda Fabia is a touch more reliable than average, with an 84.7% first-time pass rate against the UK baseline of 80%, but a significant concern emerges: 32.4% of these vehicles have recorded a dangerous defect at some point, well above the threshold that should trigger caution in a buyer. Petrol versions are noticeably more dependable, passing first time in 85.7% of cases versus 81.1% for diesel models.
At a median mileage of 42,595 miles for a ten-year-old car, these Fabias have been driven relatively conservatively, yet they're still accumulating an average of 1.77 failures and 11.1 advisories per MOT test—suggesting wear-related issues are creeping in despite modest use. Before purchase, request the full MOT history and specifically ask the seller whether any dangerous defects have been recorded and fixed; this will give you real insight into whether you're looking at a well-maintained example or one that's been patched over.
Petrol vs Diesel
Pass rate difference of 4.6 percentage points — worth knowing if you're choosing between the two.
What to check before buying a 2014 Skoda Fabia
Practical pre-purchase checks for this age and model.
- 📋 Check the full MOT history. Look for recurring advisories — slow-building issues like corrosion or brake wear patterns show up years before they become failures. Enter the reg below for a full AI analysis.
- 🔍 Inspect for corrosion in person. Brake pipes, sills, subframes, and chassis legs. Surface rust is normal at this age; structural rust is a serious problem that's expensive to fix and can fail an MOT.
- 🛞 Check tyres and brakes. The most common advisory items at this age. Budget for replacement if they're near the limit — factor this into your offer price.
- ⚠️ 32.4% of these vehicles have had a dangerous defect recorded. Enter the reg below — the full MOT history will show exactly what was flagged and whether it was resolved.
- 📄 Run an HPI check. The MOT history won't show outstanding finance, insurance write-offs, or stolen status — an HPI check will.
Before you buy a Skoda Fabia
MOT history is one piece of the puzzle. These checks can reveal what CarHunch can't.
CarHunch may earn a small commission if you buy via these links — at no extra cost to you.
Pass Rate by Fuel Type
| Fuel type | Vehicles | Pass rate | Avg failures |
|---|---|---|---|
| Petrol (78%) | 12,158 | 85.7% | 1.64 |
| Diesel (22%) | 3,387 | 81.1% | 2.23 |
| LPG (0%) | 1 | 100% | 0 |
| Other (0%) | 1 | 100% | 0 |
| Gas Bi-Fuel (0%) | 1 | 80% | 2 |
Mileage Distribution
Most 2014 Skoda Fabia vehicles sit in the blue band. If the car you're looking at is outside it, it's either unusually low or high mileage for its age.
Half of all 2014 Skoda Fabia vehicles fall between 29,687 and 56,928 miles.
2014 Skoda Fabia — Still on the Road
Strong survival — 14,147 vehicles still getting MOTs in 2025, 94% of the peak.
Based on vehicles from this manufacture year that had at least one MOT test in each calendar year. Data from 2017–2025.
MOT History Averages
Most Common MOT Issues — 2014 Skoda Fabia
Based on actual MOT test records for this model. Percentage shows how often each item appears across all vehicles in this cohort.
-
44.4%
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge
-
41.9%
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge
-
30%
Offside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing
-
28.5%
Nearside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing
-
26.5%
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened
-
23%
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge
-
19.7%
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin
-
19.3%
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge
Data covers a 3-year window centred on 2014. Counts include advisories and failures.
Found a specific Skoda Fabia?
Enter the reg to see its individual MOT history, AI Hunches, and how it compares to this cohort.