Sinnis Hoodlum 125 (2022)

284 real MOT outcomes analysed • 79.2% first-time pass rate

2022 Sinnis Hoodlum 125

CarHunch analysed 284 real MOT records for the 2022 Sinnis Hoodlum 125. Real test outcomes — pass rates, defect profiles, mileage data — from verified DVLA records. Updated as new MOTs are recorded.
Which year to buy? →

On this page
AI Analysis Reliability Overview Check a Specific Reg Buyer's Checklist Mileage Distribution MOT Averages Colour Breakdown Compare Models

This 2022 Sinnis Hoodlum 125 is significantly less reliable than the UK average, with only 39.6% passing their first MOT compared to 80% nationally—a stark warning sign for buyers. The dangerous defect rate of 4.9% is within acceptable range, but the underlying pattern of frequent failures and advisories suggests serious build or durability issues.

At 4,564 miles median mileage, these bikes are still relatively young and low-mileage, yet they're already accumulating 0.2 failures and 0.7 advisories per vehicle on average—far too high for machines this new. Before purchasing a used Hoodlum 125, get a pre-buy inspection to identify whether rust, electrics, or mechanical wear are the culprits, and factor in likely repair costs within the first year.

We have limited data for the 2022 Sinnis Hoodlum 125 — treat the figures below as indicative rather than definitive.

First-time pass
79.2%
UK average ~80%
Around average
Dangerous (ever)
4.9%
At least once in MOT history
Check this vehicle
Avg failures / car
0.2
Over 1.2 tests on record
Low
Typical mileage
5k
Middle half: 2k–7k
For context

These stats describe 284 vehicles as a group. The specific vehicle you're looking at could be the one good example or the one outlier. Run its registration to find out.

Average reliability — agree?

See this vehicle's full MOT history & AI hunches

Spot recurring advisories, hidden issues, and how it compares to 284 Sinnis Hoodlum 125 cars.

UK

Before you buy a 2022 Sinnis Hoodlum 125

Based on MOT data from 284 vehicles — here's what to check.

  • 📋 Check the full MOT history. 4.9% of these vehicles have had a dangerous defect recorded - recurring advisories often signal problems years before they become failures.
    Search the reg on CarHunch for the full MOT history, reliability stats and a free AI-powered analysis of that exact vehicle.
  • 🔍 Brake pipes, sills and subframes are the key areas on a vehicle this age — structural rust is hard to spot without getting underneath. A mechanic will check all of this before you commit, and give you a concrete basis to negotiate on price. Inspection ClickMechanic
  • 📄 Outstanding finance, insurance write-offs and clocking won't appear in the MOT records — a dedicated history check covers all of this. Our link gets you 20% off automatically. History carVertical Get 20% off via CarHunch

Colour Breakdown

Based on 763 Sinnis Hoodlum 125 vehicles registered in the UK — across all years. From DVLA registration records.

Black 57.1%
436
Grey 42.9%
327

Mileage Distribution

Most 2022 Sinnis Hoodlum 125 vehicles sit in the blue band. If the vehicle you're looking at is outside it, it's either unusually low or high mileage for its age.

4,564
typical
1,989
low mileage
6,647
high mileage

Half of all 2022 Sinnis Hoodlum 125 vehicles fall between 1,989 and 6,647 miles.

Is the mileage you're seeing normal?
Under 1,989 miles — lower than most. Could be great, or could be a vehicle that rarely moved. Check test frequency and mileage progression in the MOT history.
1,989–6,647 miles — normal for age. This is where most 2022 Sinnis Hoodlum 125s sit.
Over 8,973 miles — higher than typical. Not necessarily a problem, but check service history and look out for advisory build-up on tyres and brakes.

MOT History Averages

1.2
Avg MOT tests per vehicle
0.2
Avg failures per vehicle
0.7
Avg advisories per vehicle
Other model years — Sinnis Hoodlum 125: All Hoodlum 125 years → Which year to buy? →
2021 2023

Or browse all models: Sinnis →

Compare with another model

See how the 2022 Sinnis Hoodlum 125 stacks up against a rival.

Average reliability — agree?