Saab

Saab 9 5 SE (1999)

286 real MOT outcomes analysed • 76.5% first-time pass rate

1999 Saab 9 5 SE

CarHunch analysed 286 real MOT records for the 1999 Saab 9 5 SE. Real test outcomes — pass rates, defect profiles, mileage data — from verified DVLA records. Updated as new MOTs are recorded.
Which year to buy? →

On this page
AI Analysis Reliability Overview Check a Specific Reg Buyer's Checklist Pass Rate by Fuel Mileage Distribution MOT Averages Colour Breakdown Compare Models

The 1999 SAAB 9-5 SE is a significant reliability concern, with a first-time MOT pass rate of just 45.2%—nearly half the UK average of 80%. While dangerous defects are relatively uncommon at 4.2%, this car demands serious mechanical scrutiny before purchase.

At 114,829 miles median, these cars have covered typical mileage for their age, yet they're still racking up an average of 0.72 failures per test, suggesting structural wear rather than simple age-related decline. If you're considering one, budget for pre-purchase inspection and expect ongoing repair costs—this is a car that rewards careful vetting and regular maintenance.

We have limited data for the 1999 Saab 9 5 SE — treat the figures below as indicative rather than definitive.

First-time pass
76.5%
UK average ~80%
Around average
Dangerous (ever)
4.2%
At least once in MOT history
Check this vehicle
Avg failures / car
0.72
Over 3.1 tests on record
Moderate
Typical mileage
115k
Middle half: 92k–140k
For context

These stats describe 286 vehicles as a group. The specific vehicle you're looking at could be the one good example or the one outlier. Run its registration to find out.

Average reliability — agree?

See this vehicle's full MOT history & AI hunches

Spot recurring advisories, hidden issues, and how it compares to 286 Saab 9 5 SE cars.

UK

Before you buy a 1999 Saab 9 5 SE

Based on MOT data from 286 vehicles — here's what to check.

  • 📋 Check the full MOT history. 4.2% of these vehicles have had a dangerous defect recorded - recurring advisories often signal problems years before they become failures.
    Search the reg on CarHunch for the full MOT history, reliability stats and a free AI-powered analysis of that exact vehicle.
  • 🔍 Brake pipes, sills and subframes are the key areas on a vehicle this age — structural rust is hard to spot without getting underneath. A mechanic will check all of this before you commit, and give you a concrete basis to negotiate on price. Inspection ClickMechanic
  • 📄 Outstanding finance, insurance write-offs and clocking won't appear in the MOT records — a dedicated history check covers all of this. Our link gets you 20% off automatically. History carVertical Get 20% off via CarHunch

Pass Rate by Fuel Type

Fuel type Vehicles Pass rate Avg failures
Petrol (99%) 283 76.5% 0.72

Colour Breakdown

Based on 1,047 Saab 9 5 SE vehicles registered in the UK — across all years. From DVLA registration records.

Blue 29.6%
310
Silver 27.2%
285
Green 13.8%
145
Black 12.9%
135
Red 9.7%
102
Grey 5.4%
57
White 1.2%
13

Mileage Distribution

Most 1999 Saab 9 5 SE vehicles sit in the blue band. If the vehicle you're looking at is outside it, it's either unusually low or high mileage for its age.

114,829
typical
92,170
low mileage
140,436
high mileage

Half of all 1999 Saab 9 5 SE vehicles fall between 92,170 and 140,436 miles.

Is the mileage you're seeing normal?
Under 92,170 miles — lower than most. Could be great, or could be a vehicle that rarely moved. Check test frequency and mileage progression in the MOT history.
92,170–140,436 miles — normal for age. This is where most 1999 Saab 9 5 SEs sit.
Over 189,588 miles — higher than typical. Not necessarily a problem, but check service history and look out for advisory build-up on tyres and brakes.

MOT History Averages

3.1
Avg MOT tests per vehicle
0.72
Avg failures per vehicle
2.5
Avg advisories per vehicle
Other model years — Saab 9 5 SE: All 9 5 SE years → Which year to buy? →
1998 2000

Or browse all models: Saab →

Saab logo

Compare with another model

See how the 1999 Saab 9 5 SE stacks up against a rival.

Average reliability — agree?