Rover

Rover Metro (1995)

2,412 real MOT outcomes analysed • 62.3% first-time pass rate

1995 Rover Metro

CarHunch analysed 2,412 real MOT records for the 1995 Rover Metro. Real test outcomes — pass rates, defect profiles, mileage data — from verified DVLA records. Updated as new MOTs are recorded.
Which year to buy? →

On this page
AI Analysis Reliability Overview Common Issues Check a Specific Reg Buyer's Checklist Pass Rate by Fuel Mileage Distribution Still on the Road MOT Averages Colour Breakdown Compare Models

The 1995 Rover Metro passes its MOT first time only 62% of the time—well below the UK average of 80%—which means nearly four in ten examples fail on their test. While dangerous defects are relatively uncommon at 13%, these cars are clearly ageing poorly and will need serious money spent on them before they're roadworthy.

At an average mileage of 63,000 miles for a car nearly 30 years old, these Metros have been driven relatively gently, yet they still average 1.63 failures and 3.1 advisories per test, pointing to age-related wear rather than abuse. If you're considering one, budget for immediate suspension, exhaust, and brake work—and get a pre-purchase inspection that specifically flags any advisory items, as they're the early warning signs of expensive fixes ahead.

The 1995 Rover Metro has a below-average first-time pass rate (62.3% vs ~80% UK average) — check the specific vehicle's full MOT history carefully before buying.

⚠️ Around 1 in 8 of these vehicles have had a dangerous MOT failure at some point — usually tyres or brakes, and often a one-off issue rather than a persistent problem. The group stats won't tell you which one you're looking at.
First-time pass
62.3%
UK average ~80%
Below average
Dangerous (ever)
13%
At least once in MOT history
Check this vehicle
Avg failures / car
1.63
Over 4.4 tests on record
High
Typical mileage
58k
Middle half: 44k–73k
For context
⚠️ Below average. More vehicles in this cohort fail their first MOT than typical. Scrutinise this vehicle's history — look for recurring issues, not just the latest result.
🔧 Expect consumable spend. An average of 3.1 advisories per vehicle tells you wear items (tyres, brakes) get flagged regularly. Budget for them — they're not surprises.
🔍 The dangerous defect figure is real. Most are one-off tyre failures or brake issues — not structural problems. But it's exactly why checking the individual vehicle's history is essential, not optional.

These stats describe 2,412 vehicles as a group. The specific vehicle you're looking at could be the one good example or the one outlier. Run its registration to find out.

Buyer beware — pass it on

What tends to go wrong

Across 2,412 vehicles — figures show how many had each issue flagged at least once in their MOT history.

Brake wear 37%
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements · Service brake: efficiency below requirements
Ask the seller when brakes were last serviced. If they don't know, factor in the cost.
Tyre wear 16.5%
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit · Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit · Offside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm · …
Budget for a full set — on a vehicle this age, tyres are expected consumables. An inspection will confirm how much is left.
Exhaust & emissions 13.3%
Exhaust emissions carbon monoxide content after 2nd fast idle excessive · Exhaust emissions Lambda reading after 2nd fast idle outside specified limits
Lighting 11.6%
Offside Rear fog lamp not working
Usually cheap to fix. Worth confirming all lights work before collecting.
Suspension & steering 10%
Nearside Front Subframe mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded · Offside Front Subframe mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded
Harder to spot without a ramp — this is a good reason to book a pre-purchase inspection.
Seat belts 9.9%
Nearside Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded · Offside Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded
Corrosion / rust 8.5%
Nearside Rear Body has a sharp edge caused by corrosion
Inspect sills, subframes and brake pipes in person — photos rarely show structural rust.

Data covers a 3-year window centred on 1995.

See this vehicle's full MOT history & AI hunches

Spot recurring advisories, hidden issues, and how it compares to 2,412 Rover Metro cars.

UK

Before you buy a 1995 Rover Metro

Based on MOT data from 2,412 vehicles — here's what to check.

  • 📋 Check the full MOT history. 13% of these vehicles have had a dangerous defect recorded - recurring advisories often signal problems years before they become failures.
    Search the reg on CarHunch for the full MOT history, reliability stats and a free AI-powered analysis of that exact vehicle.
  • 🔍 Brake pipes, sills and subframes are the key areas on a vehicle this age — structural rust is hard to spot without getting underneath. A mechanic will check all of this before you commit, and give you a concrete basis to negotiate on price. Inspection ClickMechanic
  • 📄 Outstanding finance, insurance write-offs and clocking won't appear in the MOT records — a dedicated history check covers all of this. Our link gets you 20% off automatically. History carVertical Get 20% off via CarHunch

Pass Rate by Fuel Type

Fuel type Vehicles Pass rate Avg failures
Petrol (95%) 2,286 62.3% 1.64
Diesel (5%) 126 61.8% 1.46

Colour Breakdown

Based on 72,178 Rover Metro vehicles registered in the UK — across all years. From DVLA registration records.

Red 38.5%
27,815
Blue 29%
20,942
White 16.3%
11,768
Green 6.7%
4,819
Silver 3.1%
2,224
Turquoise 2.1%
1,505
Grey 1.9%
1,400
Black 1.1%
822
Purple 0.8%
550
Beige 0.2%
165
Yellow 0.2%
126
Pink 0.1%
42

Mileage Distribution

Most 1995 Rover Metro vehicles sit in the blue band. If the vehicle you're looking at is outside it, it's either unusually low or high mileage for its age.

57,810
typical
44,180
low mileage
73,128
high mileage

Half of all 1995 Rover Metro vehicles fall between 44,180 and 73,128 miles.

Is the mileage you're seeing normal?
Under 44,180 miles — lower than most. Could be great, or could be a vehicle that rarely moved. Check test frequency and mileage progression in the MOT history.
44,180–73,128 miles — normal for age. This is where most 1995 Rover Metros sit.
Over 98,722 miles — higher than typical. Not necessarily a problem, but check service history and look out for advisory build-up on tyres and brakes.

1995 Rover Metro — Still on the Road

Numbers are thinning — 13% of 1995 Rover Metros are still active.

Numbers are declining — 11 vehicles still getting MOTs in 2024 (13% of peak).

86 11 2014 2024

Based on vehicles from this manufacture year that had at least one MOT test in each calendar year. Data from 2014–2024.
* The 2020 dip reflects the government's COVID-19 MOT exemption, which allowed certificates to be extended by six months — fewer tests were conducted that year.

MOT History Averages

4.4
Avg MOT tests per vehicle
1.63
Avg failures per vehicle
3.1
Avg advisories per vehicle
Other model years — Rover Metro: All Metro years → Which year to buy? →
1982 1983 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1996 1997 1998

Or browse all models: Rover →

Rover logo

Compare with another model

See how the 1995 Rover Metro stacks up against a rival.

Buyer beware — pass it on