Peugeot

Peugeot Metal X (2003)

185 real MOT outcomes analysed • 78% first-time pass rate

2003 Peugeot Metal X

CarHunch analysed 185 real MOT records for the 2003 Peugeot Metal X. Real test outcomes — pass rates, defect profiles, mileage data — from verified DVLA records. Updated as new MOTs are recorded.
Which year to buy? →

On this page
AI Analysis Reliability Overview Check a Specific Reg Buyer's Checklist Mileage Distribution MOT Averages Compare Models

The 2003 Peugeot Metal X has a first-time pass rate of just 39.6%, well below the UK average of 80%, which signals serious reliability concerns for a nearly 20-year-old model. While dangerous defects affect only 7% of examples, the sheer frequency of failures means most of these vehicles need repair work before they'll pass their next MOT.

With a median mileage of 7,775 miles, many survivors in this dataset are either garage queens or have had their odometers reset—either way, the low average mileage makes it hard to judge real-world durability, and you should treat any example with suspicion. The average vehicle carries 0.59 failures and 1.1 advisories per test, suggesting systemic wear in suspension, brakes, and electrics; have a pre-purchase inspection by a Peugeot specialist before committing to this model.

We have limited data for the 2003 Peugeot Metal X — treat the figures below as indicative rather than definitive.

⚠️ Around 1 in 20 of these vehicles have had a dangerous MOT failure at some point — usually tyres or brakes, and often a one-off issue rather than a persistent problem. The group stats won't tell you which one you're looking at.
First-time pass
78%
UK average ~80%
Around average
Dangerous (ever)
7%
At least once in MOT history
Check this vehicle
Avg failures / car
0.59
Over 2.7 tests on record
Moderate
Typical mileage
8k
Middle half: 5k–13k
For context

These stats describe 185 vehicles as a group. The specific vehicle you're looking at could be the one good example or the one outlier. Run its registration to find out.

Average reliability — agree?

See this vehicle's full MOT history & AI hunches

Spot recurring advisories, hidden issues, and how it compares to 185 Peugeot Metal X cars.

UK

Before you buy a 2003 Peugeot Metal X

Based on MOT data from 185 vehicles — here's what to check.

  • 📋 Check the full MOT history. 7% of these vehicles have had a dangerous defect recorded - recurring advisories often signal problems years before they become failures.
    Search the reg on CarHunch for the full MOT history, reliability stats and a free AI-powered analysis of that exact vehicle.
  • 🔍 Brake pipes, sills and subframes are the key areas on a vehicle this age — structural rust is hard to spot without getting underneath. A mechanic will check all of this before you commit, and give you a concrete basis to negotiate on price. Inspection ClickMechanic
  • 📄 Outstanding finance, insurance write-offs and clocking won't appear in the MOT records — a dedicated history check covers all of this. Our link gets you 20% off automatically. History carVertical Get 20% off via CarHunch

Mileage Distribution

Most 2003 Peugeot Metal X vehicles sit in the blue band. If the vehicle you're looking at is outside it, it's either unusually low or high mileage for its age.

7,775
typical
5,289
low mileage
12,972
high mileage

Half of all 2003 Peugeot Metal X vehicles fall between 5,289 and 12,972 miles.

Is the mileage you're seeing normal?
Under 5,289 miles — lower than most. Could be great, or could be a vehicle that rarely moved. Check test frequency and mileage progression in the MOT history.
5,289–12,972 miles — normal for age. This is where most 2003 Peugeot Metal Xs sit.
Over 17,512 miles — higher than typical. Not necessarily a problem, but check service history and look out for advisory build-up on tyres and brakes.

MOT History Averages

2.7
Avg MOT tests per vehicle
0.59
Avg failures per vehicle
1.1
Avg advisories per vehicle
Peugeot logo

Compare with another model

See how the 2003 Peugeot Metal X stacks up against a rival.

Average reliability — agree?