Peugeot

Peugeot 208 Access Plus (2014)

106 real MOT outcomes analysed • 91.4% first-time pass rate

2014 Peugeot 208 Access Plus

CarHunch analysed 106 real MOT records for the 2014 Peugeot 208 Access Plus. Real test outcomes — pass rates, defect profiles, mileage data — from verified DVLA records. Updated as new MOTs are recorded.
Which year to buy? →

On this page
Reliability Overview Check a Specific Reg Buyer's Checklist Pass Rate by Fuel Mileage Distribution Still on the Road MOT Averages Compare Models

Limited data for this trim variant. The DVLA records this vehicle under a specific trim-level name with only 106 vehicles on record — some statistics may not be reliable at this sample size.

See the full 2014 PEUGEOT 208 (30,732 vehicles)

We have limited data for the 2014 Peugeot 208 Access Plus — treat the figures below as indicative rather than definitive.

First-time pass
91.4%
UK average ~80%
Better than average
Dangerous (ever)
0%
At least once in MOT history
Check this vehicle
Avg failures / car
0.42
Over 4.5 tests on record
Low
Typical mileage
47k
Middle half: 33k–59k
For context

These stats describe 106 vehicles as a group. The specific vehicle you're looking at could be the one good example or the one outlier. Run its registration to find out.

A solid choice — agree?

See this vehicle's full MOT history & AI hunches

Spot recurring advisories, hidden issues, and how it compares to 106 Peugeot 208 Access Plus cars.

UK

Before you buy a 2014 Peugeot 208 Access Plus

Based on MOT data from 106 vehicles — here's what to check.

  • 📋 Check the full MOT history. 0% of these vehicles have had a dangerous defect recorded - recurring advisories often signal problems years before they become failures.
    Search the reg on CarHunch for the full MOT history, reliability stats and a free AI-powered analysis of that exact vehicle.
  • 🔍 Brake pipes, sills and subframes are the key areas on a vehicle this age — structural rust is hard to spot without getting underneath. A mechanic will check all of this before you commit, and give you a concrete basis to negotiate on price. Inspection ClickMechanic
  • 📄 Outstanding finance, insurance write-offs and clocking won't appear in the MOT records — a dedicated history check covers all of this. Our link gets you 20% off automatically. History carVertical Get 20% off via CarHunch

Pass Rate by Fuel Type

Fuel type Vehicles Pass rate Avg failures
Other (73%) 77 91.9% 0.52

Mileage Distribution

Most 2014 Peugeot 208 Access Plus vehicles sit in the blue band. If the vehicle you're looking at is outside it, it's either unusually low or high mileage for its age.

46,749
typical
33,162
low mileage
58,810
high mileage

Half of all 2014 Peugeot 208 Access Plus vehicles fall between 33,162 and 58,810 miles.

Is the mileage you're seeing normal?
Under 33,162 miles — lower than most. Could be great, or could be a vehicle that rarely moved. Check test frequency and mileage progression in the MOT history.
33,162–58,810 miles — normal for age. This is where most 2014 Peugeot 208 Access Pluss sit.
Over 79,393 miles — higher than typical. Not necessarily a problem, but check service history and look out for advisory build-up on tyres and brakes.

2014 Peugeot 208 Access Plus — Still on the Road

Almost all 2014 Peugeot 208 Access Pluss are still on the road.

Strong survival — 60 vehicles still getting MOTs in 2025, 97% of the peak.

56 60 2018 2025

Based on vehicles from this manufacture year that had at least one MOT test in each calendar year. Data from 2018–2025.
* The 2020 dip reflects the government's COVID-19 MOT exemption, which allowed certificates to be extended by six months — fewer tests were conducted that year.

MOT History Averages

4.5
Avg MOT tests per vehicle
0.42
Avg failures per vehicle
0
Avg advisories per vehicle
Other model years — Peugeot 208 Access Plus: All 208 Access Plus years → Which year to buy? →
2013

Or browse all models: Peugeot →

Peugeot logo

Compare with another model

See how the 2014 Peugeot 208 Access Plus stacks up against a rival.

A solid choice — agree?