Perodua

Perodua Kenari (2004)

241 real MOT outcomes analysed • 77.7% first-time pass rate

2004 Perodua Kenari

CarHunch analysed 241 real MOT records for the 2004 Perodua Kenari. Real test outcomes — pass rates, defect profiles, mileage data — from verified DVLA records. Updated as new MOTs are recorded.
Which year to buy? →

On this page
AI Analysis Reliability Overview Common Issues Check a Specific Reg Buyer's Checklist Mileage Distribution Still on the Road MOT Averages Colour Breakdown Compare Models

The 2004 Perodua Kenari passes its MOT on the first attempt 77.7% of the time, slightly below the UK average of 80%, suggesting these cars need a bit more attention than most vehicles their age. The dangerous defect rate of 15.8% is reasonably clean and shouldn't be a major concern for a buyer.

These Kenaris are running at just 37,525 miles on average—genuinely low mileage for a 20-year-old car—which explains the modest failure count of 3.1 issues per vehicle, though advisories are frequent at 12.4 per test, pointing to wear in minor components. Before purchase, have a pre-buy inspection focus on those advisory items (likely trim, lights, and suspension wear) to understand what maintenance lies ahead.

We have limited data for the 2004 Perodua Kenari — treat the figures below as indicative rather than definitive.

⚠️ Around 1 in 8 of these vehicles have had a dangerous MOT failure at some point — usually tyres or brakes, and often a one-off issue rather than a persistent problem. The group stats won't tell you which one you're looking at.
First-time pass
77.7%
UK average ~80%
Around average
Dangerous (ever)
15.8%
At least once in MOT history
Check this vehicle
Avg failures / car
3.1
Over 13.3 tests on record
High
Typical mileage
37k
Middle half: 25k–47k
For context

These stats describe 241 vehicles as a group. The specific vehicle you're looking at could be the one good example or the one outlier. Run its registration to find out.

Average reliability — agree?

What tends to go wrong

Across 241 vehicles — figures show how many had each issue flagged at least once in their MOT history.

Tyre wear 51%
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit · Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit · Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit · …
Budget for a full set — on a vehicle this age, tyres are expected consumables. An inspection will confirm how much is left.
Other issues 23.6%
Oil leak · Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 40mm circle outside zone 'A'
Exhaust & emissions 20.9%
Exhaust emissions Lambda reading after 2nd fast idle outside specified limits
Wipers & washers 19.7%
Offside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively · Nearside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively
Brake wear 17.4%
Offside Rear Brake pipe slightly corroded · Offside Front Brake pipe slightly corroded · Nearside Rear Brake pipe slightly corroded
Ask the seller when brakes were last serviced. If they don't know, factor in the cost.
Lighting 17.2%
Nearside Headlamp aim too low · Offside Headlamp aim too low · Exhaust has part of the system slightly deteriorated
Usually cheap to fix. Worth confirming all lights work before collecting.

Data covers a 3-year window centred on 2004.

See this vehicle's full MOT history & AI hunches

Spot recurring advisories, hidden issues, and how it compares to 241 Perodua Kenari cars.

UK

Before you buy a 2004 Perodua Kenari

Based on MOT data from 241 vehicles — here's what to check.

  • 📋 Check the full MOT history. 15.8% of these vehicles have had a dangerous defect recorded - recurring advisories often signal problems years before they become failures.
    Search the reg on CarHunch for the full MOT history, reliability stats and a free AI-powered analysis of that exact vehicle.
  • 🔍 Brake pipes, sills and subframes are the key areas on a vehicle this age — structural rust is hard to spot without getting underneath. A mechanic will check all of this before you commit, and give you a concrete basis to negotiate on price. Inspection ClickMechanic
  • 📄 Outstanding finance, insurance write-offs and clocking won't appear in the MOT records — a dedicated history check covers all of this. Our link gets you 20% off automatically. History carVertical Get 20% off via CarHunch

Colour Breakdown

Based on 1,966 Perodua Kenari vehicles registered in the UK — across all years. From DVLA registration records.

Silver 31.4%
617
Gold 27.6%
542
Blue 18.7%
368
Green 12.5%
245
Grey 9.2%
181
Purple 0.4%
7
Beige 0.3%
6

Mileage Distribution

Most 2004 Perodua Kenari vehicles sit in the blue band. If the vehicle you're looking at is outside it, it's either unusually low or high mileage for its age.

36,570
typical
25,481
low mileage
46,998
high mileage

Half of all 2004 Perodua Kenari vehicles fall between 25,481 and 46,998 miles.

Is the mileage you're seeing normal?
Under 25,481 miles — lower than most. Could be great, or could be a vehicle that rarely moved. Check test frequency and mileage progression in the MOT history.
25,481–46,998 miles — normal for age. This is where most 2004 Perodua Kenaris sit.
Over 63,447 miles — higher than typical. Not necessarily a problem, but check service history and look out for advisory build-up on tyres and brakes.

2004 Perodua Kenari — Still on the Road

Numbers are thinning — 15% of 2004 Perodua Kenaris are still active.

Numbers are declining — 26 vehicles still getting MOTs in 2025 (15% of peak).

177 26 2014 2025

Based on vehicles from this manufacture year that had at least one MOT test in each calendar year. Data from 2014–2025.
* The 2020 dip reflects the government's COVID-19 MOT exemption, which allowed certificates to be extended by six months — fewer tests were conducted that year.

MOT History Averages

13.3
Avg MOT tests per vehicle
3.1
Avg failures per vehicle
12.4
Avg advisories per vehicle
Other model years — Perodua Kenari: All Kenari years → Which year to buy? →
2001 2002 2003 2005 2006

Or browse all models: Perodua →

Perodua logo

Compare with another model

See how the 2004 Perodua Kenari stacks up against a rival.

Average reliability — agree?