Perodua

Perodua Kelisa (2006)

256 real MOT outcomes analysed • 79.2% first-time pass rate

2006 Perodua Kelisa

CarHunch analysed 256 real MOT records for the 2006 Perodua Kelisa. Real test outcomes — pass rates, defect profiles, mileage data — from verified DVLA records. Updated as new MOTs are recorded.
Which year to buy? →

On this page
AI Analysis Reliability Overview Common Issues Check a Specific Reg Buyer's Checklist Mileage Distribution Still on the Road MOT Averages Colour Breakdown Compare Models

The 2006 Perodua Kelisa sits right at the UK average with a 79.2% first-time pass rate, but the concerning detail is that 21.1% of these cars have recorded at least one dangerous defect during their MOT history—well above the threshold that should raise a red flag for buyers. This is a reliability warning sign that demands a thorough pre-purchase inspection by a trusted mechanic.

At 33,393 miles median, these 18-year-old cars show relatively modest mileage for their age, yet they're averaging 3.09 failures and 12.4 advisories per test, suggesting accumulated wear typical of city cars that have had hard lives. Before committing to one, get an independent inspection focusing on structural integrity and brake systems, and budget for immediate remedial work on any advisories the next MOT reveals.

We have limited data for the 2006 Perodua Kelisa — treat the figures below as indicative rather than definitive.

⚠️ Over 1 in 5 of these vehicles have had a dangerous MOT failure at some point — usually tyres or brakes, and often a one-off issue rather than a persistent problem. The group stats won't tell you which one you're looking at.
First-time pass
79.2%
UK average ~80%
Around average
Dangerous (ever)
21.1%
At least once in MOT history
Check this vehicle
Avg failures / car
3.09
Over 13.9 tests on record
High
Typical mileage
33k
Middle half: 23k–46k
For context

These stats describe 256 vehicles as a group. The specific vehicle you're looking at could be the one good example or the one outlier. Run its registration to find out.

Average reliability — agree?

What tends to go wrong

Across 256 vehicles — figures show how many had each issue flagged at least once in their MOT history.

Tyre wear 55.7%
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit · Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit · Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit · …
Budget for a full set — on a vehicle this age, tyres are expected consumables. An inspection will confirm how much is left.
Brake wear 27.1%
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin
Ask the seller when brakes were last serviced. If they don't know, factor in the cost.
Wipers & washers 23.7%
Nearside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively · Offside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively
Other issues 22.1%
Oil leak · Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 40mm circle outside zone 'A' · Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 10mm circle within zone 'A'
Lighting 19.9%
Nearside Headlamp aim too low
Usually cheap to fix. Worth confirming all lights work before collecting.
Exhaust & emissions 15.3%
Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases

Data covers a 3-year window centred on 2006.

See this vehicle's full MOT history & AI hunches

Spot recurring advisories, hidden issues, and how it compares to 256 Perodua Kelisa cars.

UK

Before you buy a 2006 Perodua Kelisa

Based on MOT data from 256 vehicles — here's what to check.

  • 📋 Check the full MOT history. 21.1% of these vehicles have had a dangerous defect recorded - recurring advisories often signal problems years before they become failures.
    Search the reg on CarHunch for the full MOT history, reliability stats and a free AI-powered analysis of that exact vehicle.
  • 🔍 Brake pipes, sills and subframes are the key areas on a vehicle this age — structural rust is hard to spot without getting underneath. A mechanic will check all of this before you commit, and give you a concrete basis to negotiate on price. Inspection ClickMechanic
  • 📄 Outstanding finance, insurance write-offs and clocking won't appear in the MOT records — a dedicated history check covers all of this. Our link gets you 20% off automatically. History carVertical Get 20% off via CarHunch

Colour Breakdown

Based on 2,315 Perodua Kelisa vehicles registered in the UK — across all years. From DVLA registration records.

Silver 36.1%
836
Gold 13.6%
314
Red 10.7%
248
Blue 9.4%
217
White 8.9%
206
Green 8.5%
197
Grey 6.3%
146
Purple 5.8%
135
Yellow 0.7%
16

Mileage Distribution

Most 2006 Perodua Kelisa vehicles sit in the blue band. If the vehicle you're looking at is outside it, it's either unusually low or high mileage for its age.

33,393
typical
22,758
low mileage
46,217
high mileage

Half of all 2006 Perodua Kelisa vehicles fall between 22,758 and 46,217 miles.

Is the mileage you're seeing normal?
Under 22,758 miles — lower than most. Could be great, or could be a vehicle that rarely moved. Check test frequency and mileage progression in the MOT history.
22,758–46,217 miles — normal for age. This is where most 2006 Perodua Kelisas sit.
Over 62,392 miles — higher than typical. Not necessarily a problem, but check service history and look out for advisory build-up on tyres and brakes.

2006 Perodua Kelisa — Still on the Road

Numbers are thinning — 24% of 2006 Perodua Kelisas are still active.

Numbers are declining — 53 vehicles still getting MOTs in 2025 (24% of peak).

222 53 2014 2025

Based on vehicles from this manufacture year that had at least one MOT test in each calendar year. Data from 2014–2025.
* The 2020 dip reflects the government's COVID-19 MOT exemption, which allowed certificates to be extended by six months — fewer tests were conducted that year.

MOT History Averages

13.9
Avg MOT tests per vehicle
3.09
Avg failures per vehicle
12.4
Avg advisories per vehicle
Other model years — Perodua Kelisa: All Kelisa years → Which year to buy? →
2002 2003 2004 2005 2007 2008

Or browse all models: Perodua →

Perodua logo

Compare with another model

See how the 2006 Perodua Kelisa stacks up against a rival.

Average reliability — agree?