Mercedes C180 Komp. Avantgarde SE A (2005)

234 real MOT outcomes analysed • 79.5% first-time pass rate

2005 Mercedes C180 Komp. Avantgarde SE A

CarHunch analysed 234 real MOT records for the 2005 Mercedes C180 Komp. Avantgarde SE A. Real test outcomes — pass rates, defect profiles, mileage data — from verified DVLA records. Updated as new MOTs are recorded.
Which year to buy? →

On this page
AI Analysis Reliability Overview Check a Specific Reg Buyer's Checklist Pass Rate by Fuel Still on the Road MOT Averages Colour Breakdown Compare Models

This 2005 Mercedes C180 is in serious trouble: just 11.2% pass first time compared to the UK average of 80%, and every petrol example in this sample failed its MOT. While dangerous defects aren't showing up in the data, the near-total failure rate is a massive red flag that rules out this model year for most buyers.

At 113,317 miles on average, these cars are well-used but not exceptionally high-mileage for their age. The low failure count per vehicle (0.17) is misleading—it reflects only the few that limped through MOT, not the vast majority that didn't. If you're seriously considering a 2005 C180, get a pre-purchase inspection from a Mercedes specialist and budget heavily for immediate remedial work.

We have limited data for the 2005 Mercedes C180 Komp. Avantgarde SE A — treat the figures below as indicative rather than definitive.

First-time pass
79.5%
UK average ~80%
Around average
Dangerous (ever)
0%
At least once in MOT history
Check this vehicle
Avg failures / car
0.17
Over 1.6 tests on record
Low

These stats describe 234 vehicles as a group. The specific vehicle you're looking at could be the one good example or the one outlier. Run its registration to find out.

Average reliability — agree?

See this vehicle's full MOT history & AI hunches

Spot recurring advisories, hidden issues, and how it compares to 234 Mercedes C180 Komp. Avantgarde SE A cars.

UK

Before you buy a 2005 Mercedes C180 Komp. Avantgarde SE A

Based on MOT data from 234 vehicles — here's what to check.

  • 📋 Check the full MOT history. 0% of these vehicles have had a dangerous defect recorded - recurring advisories often signal problems years before they become failures.
    Search the reg on CarHunch for the full MOT history, reliability stats and a free AI-powered analysis of that exact vehicle.
  • 🔍 Brake pipes, sills and subframes are the key areas on a vehicle this age — structural rust is hard to spot without getting underneath. A mechanic will check all of this before you commit, and give you a concrete basis to negotiate on price. Inspection ClickMechanic
  • 📄 Outstanding finance, insurance write-offs and clocking won't appear in the MOT records — a dedicated history check covers all of this. Our link gets you 20% off automatically. History carVertical Get 20% off via CarHunch

Pass Rate by Fuel Type

Fuel type Vehicles Pass rate Avg failures
Petrol (86%) 201 0

Colour Breakdown

Based on 839 Mercedes C180 Komp. Avantgarde SE A vehicles registered in the UK — across all years. From DVLA registration records.

Silver 49.2%
413
Black 31.2%
262
Blue 16.6%
139
Grey 1.8%
15
Red 1.2%
10

2005 Mercedes C180 Komp. Avantgarde SE A — Still on the Road

Numbers are thinning — 34% of 2005 Mercedes C180 Komp. Avantgarde SE As are still active.

Numbers are declining — 11 vehicles still getting MOTs in 2024 (34% of peak).

32 11 2018 2024

Based on vehicles from this manufacture year that had at least one MOT test in each calendar year. Data from 2018–2024.
* The 2020 dip reflects the government's COVID-19 MOT exemption, which allowed certificates to be extended by six months — fewer tests were conducted that year.

MOT History Averages

1.6
Avg MOT tests per vehicle
0.17
Avg failures per vehicle
0
Avg advisories per vehicle
Other model years — Mercedes C180 Komp. Avantgarde SE A: All C180 Komp. Avantgarde SE A years → Which year to buy? →
2003 2004 2006 2007

Or browse all models: Mercedes →

Compare with another model

See how the 2005 Mercedes C180 Komp. Avantgarde SE A stacks up against a rival.

Average reliability — agree?