Should I check the MOT history before buying a 2007 KTM 690 Lc4 Supermoto?

Yes. Look for recurring advisories — slow-building issues like corrosion or brake wear patterns show up years before they become failures. A full MOT history analysis will highlight patterns that a single test result won't reveal.

What corrosion should I look for when inspecting a 2007 KTM 690 Lc4 Supermoto?

Check brake pipes, sills, subframes, and chassis legs. Surface rust is normal at this age; structural rust is a serious problem that is expensive to fix and can fail an MOT.

How are tyres and brakes typically on a 2007 KTM 690 Lc4 Supermoto?

Tyres and brakes are the most common advisory items on vehicles of this age. Budget for replacement if they are near the limit, and factor this into your offer price.

Is the 2007 KTM 690 Lc4 Supermoto reliable?

Based on MOT data from 148 vehicles, the 2007 KTM 690 Lc4 Supermoto has a first-time MOT pass rate of 87.2%, indicating generally reliable for its class. Always check the full MOT history of any specific vehicle before buying.

Do I need an HPI check when buying a 2007 KTM 690 Lc4 Supermoto?

Yes. The MOT history will not show outstanding finance, insurance write-offs, or stolen status. An HPI check covers these areas and should be part of any used car purchase.

CarHunch

Get Started

KTM 690 Lc4 Supermoto (2007)

148 real MOT outcomes analysed • 87.2% first-time pass rate

2007 KTM 690 Lc4 Supermoto

CarHunch analysed 148 real MOT records for the 2007 KTM 690 Lc4 Supermoto. Real test outcomes — pass rates, defect profiles, mileage data — from verified DVLA records. Updated as new MOTs are recorded.
Which year to buy? →

On this page

AI Analysis Reliability Overview Check a Specific Reg Buyer's Checklist Pass Rate by Fuel Mileage Distribution Still on the Road MOT Averages Compare Models

The 2007 KTM 690 LC4 Supermoto has a first-time MOT pass rate of just 60.2%, significantly below the UK average of 80%, which means nearly 4 in 10 of these bikes fail their test. The dangerous defect rate of 8.1% is manageable, but the combination of poor pass rate and an average of 0.89 failures per vehicle suggests these older singles need close attention to stay roadworthy.

At a median mileage of 7,975 miles for a 17-year-old bike, these machines are lightly used, yet they're still picking up an average of 2.4 advisories each—a sign that age and storage matter more than miles on this model. Before buying, have a pre-purchase inspection focus on the ignition system, fuel delivery, and chassis bearings, as these are common weak points on air-cooled singles left unused for long periods.

We have limited data for the 2007 KTM 690 Lc4 Supermoto — treat the figures below as indicative rather than definitive.

⚠️ About 1 in 12 of these vehicles have had a dangerous MOT failure at some point — usually tyres or brakes, and often a one-off issue rather than a persistent problem. The group stats won't tell you which one you're looking at.

First-time pass

87.2%

UK average ~80%

Around average

Dangerous (ever)

8.1%

At least once in MOT history

Check this vehicle

Avg failures / car

0.89

Over 6.1 tests on record

Moderate

Typical mileage

Middle half: 5k–13k

For context

These stats describe 148 vehicles as a group. The specific vehicle you're looking at could be the one good example or the one outlier. Run its registration to find out.

A solid choice — agree?

See this vehicle's full MOT history & AI hunches

Spot recurring advisories, hidden issues, and how it compares to 148 KTM 690 Lc4 Supermoto cars.

Before you buy a 2007 KTM 690 Lc4 Supermoto

Based on MOT data from 148 vehicles — here's what to check.

📋 Check the full MOT history. 8.1% of these vehicles have had a dangerous defect recorded - recurring advisories often signal problems years before they become failures.
Search the reg on CarHunch for the full MOT history, reliability stats and a free AI-powered analysis of that exact vehicle.
🔍 Brake pipes, sills and subframes are the key areas on a vehicle this age — structural rust is hard to spot without getting underneath. A mechanic will check all of this before you commit, and give you a concrete basis to negotiate on price. Inspection →
📄 Outstanding finance, insurance write-offs and clocking won't appear in the MOT records — a dedicated history check covers all of this. Our link gets you 20% off automatically. History Get 20% off via CarHunch

Pass Rate by Fuel Type

Fuel type	Vehicles	Pass rate	Avg failures
Petrol (97%)	144	86.8%	0.91

Mileage Distribution

Most 2007 KTM 690 Lc4 Supermoto vehicles sit in the blue band. If the vehicle you're looking at is outside it, it's either unusually low or high mileage for its age.

7,975

typical

5,480

low mileage

12,846

high mileage

Half of all 2007 KTM 690 Lc4 Supermoto vehicles fall between 5,480 and 12,846 miles.

Is the mileage you're seeing normal?

✓ Under 5,480 miles — lower than most. Could be great, or could be a vehicle that rarely moved. Check test frequency and mileage progression in the MOT history.

✓ 5,480–12,846 miles — normal for age. This is where most 2007 KTM 690 Lc4 Supermotos sit.

⚠ Over 17,342 miles — higher than typical. Not necessarily a problem, but check service history and look out for advisory build-up on tyres and brakes.

2007 KTM 690 Lc4 Supermoto — Still on the Road

Numbers are thinning — 42% of 2007 KTM 690 Lc4 Supermotos are still active.

Numbers are declining — 22 vehicles still getting MOTs in 2025 (42% of peak).

Based on vehicles from this manufacture year that had at least one MOT test in each calendar year. Data from 2014–2025.
* The 2020 dip reflects the government's COVID-19 MOT exemption, which allowed certificates to be extended by six months — fewer tests were conducted that year.

MOT History Averages

6.1

Avg MOT tests per vehicle

0.89

Avg failures per vehicle

2.4

Avg advisories per vehicle

Other model years — KTM 690 Lc4 Supermoto: All 690 Lc4 Supermoto years → Which year to buy? →

2008

Or browse all models: KTM →

Compare with another model

See how the 2007 KTM 690 Lc4 Supermoto stacks up against a rival.

A solid choice — agree?