Kawasaki Zzr600 (2002)

260 real MOT outcomes analysed • 86.3% first-time pass rate

2002 Kawasaki Zzr600

CarHunch analysed 260 real MOT records for the 2002 Kawasaki Zzr600. Real test outcomes — pass rates, defect profiles, mileage data — from verified DVLA records. Updated as new MOTs are recorded.
Which year to buy? →

On this page
AI Analysis Reliability Overview Common Issues Check a Specific Reg Buyer's Checklist Mileage Distribution Still on the Road MOT Averages Colour Breakdown Compare Models

The 2002 Kawasaki ZZR600 passes its MOT at 86.2%, comfortably above the UK average of 80%, which is a solid result for a 20-year-old bike. However, nearly 22% of these machines have recorded a dangerous defect at some point, which is a real concern for any potential buyer and warrants a thorough pre-purchase inspection.

The median mileage of just under 18,000 miles suggests these are either well-preserved classics or have spent considerable time in storage, which can mask wear issues that show up under riding stress. With an average of 1.86 failures per test and nearly 7 advisories, the typical ZZR600 needs regular attention to brakes, lights, and wear items—so budget for preventive maintenance and have a trusted mechanic give it a full once-over before committing to a purchase.

We have limited data for the 2002 Kawasaki Zzr600 — treat the figures below as indicative rather than definitive.

⚠️ Over 1 in 5 of these vehicles have had a dangerous MOT failure at some point — usually tyres or brakes, and often a one-off issue rather than a persistent problem. The group stats won't tell you which one you're looking at.
First-time pass
86.3%
UK average ~80%
Around average
Dangerous (ever)
21.9%
At least once in MOT history
Check this vehicle
Avg failures / car
1.86
Over 12.5 tests on record
High
Typical mileage
18k
Middle half: 11k–27k
For context

These stats describe 260 vehicles as a group. The specific vehicle you're looking at could be the one good example or the one outlier. Run its registration to find out.

Average reliability — agree?

What tends to go wrong

Across 260 vehicles — figures show how many had each issue flagged at least once in their MOT history.

Tyre wear 70.3%
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit · Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit · Front Tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm · …
Budget for a full set — on a vehicle this age, tyres are expected consumables. An inspection will confirm how much is left.
Lighting 48.4%
Drive chain slightly loose · Headlamp masks/converters fitted · Headlamp aim beam image kick up to the offside
Usually cheap to fix. Worth confirming all lights work before collecting.
Brake wear 34.9%
Front Roller brake test indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort · Front Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit · Rear Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit · …
Ask the seller when brakes were last serviced. If they don't know, factor in the cost.
Other issues 23%
Drive chain worn but not considered excessive · Drive chain excessively loose
Exhaust & emissions 8.5%
Exhaust is leaking but is not excessively noisey

Data covers a 3-year window centred on 2002.

See this vehicle's full MOT history & AI hunches

Spot recurring advisories, hidden issues, and how it compares to 260 Kawasaki Zzr600 cars.

UK

Before you buy a 2002 Kawasaki Zzr600

Based on MOT data from 260 vehicles — here's what to check.

  • 📋 Check the full MOT history. 21.9% of these vehicles have had a dangerous defect recorded - recurring advisories often signal problems years before they become failures.
    Search the reg on CarHunch for the full MOT history, reliability stats and a free AI-powered analysis of that exact vehicle.
  • 🔍 Brake pipes, sills and subframes are the key areas on a vehicle this age — structural rust is hard to spot without getting underneath. A mechanic will check all of this before you commit, and give you a concrete basis to negotiate on price. Inspection ClickMechanic
  • 📄 Outstanding finance, insurance write-offs and clocking won't appear in the MOT records — a dedicated history check covers all of this. Our link gets you 20% off automatically. History carVertical Get 20% off via CarHunch

Colour Breakdown

Based on 6,437 Kawasaki Zzr600 vehicles registered in the UK — across all years. From DVLA registration records.

Black 28.6%
1,839
Red 27.9%
1,795
Blue 14.9%
959
Silver 9.2%
593
Purple 8.1%
524
Green 7.8%
502
Multi-colour 0.9%
61
Maroon 0.7%
45
Grey 0.7%
42
Yellow 0.6%
36
White 0.5%
31
Orange 0.2%
10

Mileage Distribution

Most 2002 Kawasaki Zzr600 vehicles sit in the blue band. If the vehicle you're looking at is outside it, it's either unusually low or high mileage for its age.

17,868
typical
11,157
low mileage
26,697
high mileage

Half of all 2002 Kawasaki Zzr600 vehicles fall between 11,157 and 26,697 miles.

Is the mileage you're seeing normal?
Under 11,157 miles — lower than most. Could be great, or could be a vehicle that rarely moved. Check test frequency and mileage progression in the MOT history.
11,157–26,697 miles — normal for age. This is where most 2002 Kawasaki Zzr600s sit.
Over 36,040 miles — higher than typical. Not necessarily a problem, but check service history and look out for advisory build-up on tyres and brakes.

2002 Kawasaki Zzr600 — Still on the Road

Numbers are thinning — 48% of 2002 Kawasaki Zzr600s are still active.

Numbers are declining — 72 vehicles still getting MOTs in 2025 (48% of peak).

150 72 2014 2025

Based on vehicles from this manufacture year that had at least one MOT test in each calendar year. Data from 2014–2025.
* The 2020 dip reflects the government's COVID-19 MOT exemption, which allowed certificates to be extended by six months — fewer tests were conducted that year.

MOT History Averages

12.5
Avg MOT tests per vehicle
1.86
Avg failures per vehicle
6.9
Avg advisories per vehicle
Other model years — Kawasaki Zzr600: All Zzr600 years → Which year to buy? →
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2003 2004

Or browse all models: Kawasaki →

Compare with another model

See how the 2002 Kawasaki Zzr600 stacks up against a rival.

Average reliability — agree?