Kawasaki Zx (2013)

295 real MOT outcomes analysed • 91.7% first-time pass rate

2013 Kawasaki Zx

CarHunch analysed 295 real MOT records for the 2013 Kawasaki Zx. Real test outcomes — pass rates, defect profiles, mileage data — from verified DVLA records. Updated as new MOTs are recorded.
Which year to buy? →

On this page
AI Analysis Reliability Overview Common Issues Check a Specific Reg Buyer's Checklist Mileage Distribution Still on the Road MOT Averages Colour Breakdown Compare Models

The 2013 Kawasaki ZX is a notably reliable performer, with a 91.7% first-time MOT pass rate that sits well above the UK average of 80%, signalling solid build quality and owner maintenance discipline. The dangerous defect rate of 16.6% is moderate and worth noting—not alarming, but a reminder to inspect brakes, tyres, and lighting carefully before purchase.

These bikes average just 12,489 miles at test time, suggesting typical weekend or leisure use rather than heavy commuting, which supports the strong pass rate. With only 0.66 failures per vehicle and 2.5 advisories, most issues tend to be minor wear items rather than structural problems—a practical takeaway is to focus your pre-purchase inspection on consumables like brake pads, chain tension, and fluid condition rather than worrying about major mechanical flaws.

We have limited data for the 2013 Kawasaki Zx — treat the figures below as indicative rather than definitive.

⚠️ Around 1 in 8 of these vehicles have had a dangerous MOT failure at some point — usually tyres or brakes, and often a one-off issue rather than a persistent problem. The group stats won't tell you which one you're looking at.
First-time pass
91.7%
UK average ~80%
Better than average
Dangerous (ever)
16.6%
At least once in MOT history
Check this vehicle
Avg failures / car
0.66
Over 6.6 tests on record
Moderate
Typical mileage
10k
Middle half: 6k–16k
For context

These stats describe 295 vehicles as a group. The specific vehicle you're looking at could be the one good example or the one outlier. Run its registration to find out.

Average reliability — agree?

What tends to go wrong

Across 295 vehicles — figures show how many had each issue flagged at least once in their MOT history.

Exhaust & emissions 55.4%
Exhaust noisy
Tyre wear 36.4%
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit · Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit · Rear Tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm · …
Budget for a full set — on a vehicle this age, tyres are expected consumables. An inspection will confirm how much is left.
Lighting 17.3%
Drive chain slightly loose · Rear reflector missing · Headlamp aim too high · …
Usually cheap to fix. Worth confirming all lights work before collecting.
Brake wear 15%
Front Brake indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort · Front Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit · Rear Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit
Ask the seller when brakes were last serviced. If they don't know, factor in the cost.
Suspension & steering 7.8%
Steering headbearing slightly stiff or notchy
Harder to spot without a ramp — this is a good reason to book a pre-purchase inspection.
Other issues 5.6%
Drive chain worn but not considered excessive · Registration plate does not conform to the specified requirements

Data covers a 3-year window centred on 2013.

See this vehicle's full MOT history & AI hunches

Spot recurring advisories, hidden issues, and how it compares to 295 Kawasaki Zx cars.

UK

Before you buy a 2013 Kawasaki Zx

Based on MOT data from 295 vehicles — here's what to check.

  • 📋 Check the full MOT history. 16.6% of these vehicles have had a dangerous defect recorded - recurring advisories often signal problems years before they become failures.
    Search the reg on CarHunch for the full MOT history, reliability stats and a free AI-powered analysis of that exact vehicle.
  • 🔍 Brake pipes, sills and subframes are the key areas on a vehicle this age — structural rust is hard to spot without getting underneath. A mechanic will check all of this before you commit, and give you a concrete basis to negotiate on price. Inspection ClickMechanic
  • 📄 Outstanding finance, insurance write-offs and clocking won't appear in the MOT records — a dedicated history check covers all of this. Our link gets you 20% off automatically. History carVertical Get 20% off via CarHunch

Colour Breakdown

Based on 6,199 Kawasaki Zx vehicles registered in the UK — across all years. From DVLA registration records.

Green 54.4%
3,374
Grey 17.6%
1,092
Black 14.2%
879
Blue 5.3%
328
Red 5.2%
321
White 2.6%
161
Silver 0.3%
21
Multi-colour 0.2%
10
Orange 0.1%
8
Yellow 0.1%
5

Mileage Distribution

Most 2013 Kawasaki Zx vehicles sit in the blue band. If the vehicle you're looking at is outside it, it's either unusually low or high mileage for its age.

10,252
typical
5,978
low mileage
15,665
high mileage

Half of all 2013 Kawasaki Zx vehicles fall between 5,978 and 15,665 miles.

Is the mileage you're seeing normal?
Under 5,978 miles — lower than most. Could be great, or could be a vehicle that rarely moved. Check test frequency and mileage progression in the MOT history.
5,978–15,665 miles — normal for age. This is where most 2013 Kawasaki Zxs sit.
Over 21,147 miles — higher than typical. Not necessarily a problem, but check service history and look out for advisory build-up on tyres and brakes.

2013 Kawasaki Zx — Still on the Road

Most 2013 Kawasaki Zxs are still being driven.

162 vehicles still getting MOTs in 2025 — 77% of the peak remain.

58 162 2016 2025

Based on vehicles from this manufacture year that had at least one MOT test in each calendar year. Data from 2016–2025.
* The 2020 dip reflects the government's COVID-19 MOT exemption, which allowed certificates to be extended by six months — fewer tests were conducted that year.

MOT History Averages

6.6
Avg MOT tests per vehicle
0.66
Avg failures per vehicle
2.5
Avg advisories per vehicle
Other model years — Kawasaki Zx: All Zx years → Which year to buy? →
2014 2015 2016 2017

Or browse all models: Kawasaki →

Compare with another model

See how the 2013 Kawasaki Zx stacks up against a rival.

Average reliability — agree?