Kawasaki Kle (2015)

271 real MOT outcomes analysed • 90.2% first-time pass rate

2015 Kawasaki Kle

CarHunch analysed 271 real MOT records for the 2015 Kawasaki Kle. Real test outcomes — pass rates, defect profiles, mileage data — from verified DVLA records. Updated as new MOTs are recorded.
Which year to buy? →

On this page
AI Analysis Reliability Overview Common Issues Check a Specific Reg Buyer's Checklist Mileage Distribution Still on the Road MOT Averages Colour Breakdown Compare Models

The 2015 Kawasaki KLE is a genuinely reliable machine, passing MOT on the first attempt 90.2% of the time versus the UK average of 80%—that's a 10-point advantage that speaks volumes. However, 18.1% of these bikes have recorded a dangerous defect at some point, which is high enough to warrant a pre-purchase inspection by a specialist, particularly around braking and lighting systems.

At 13,147 miles median mileage, these bikes have been relatively lightly used for their age, suggesting many are weekend or leisure machines rather than commuters. With only 0.8 average failures per vehicle but 2.9 advisories, you're more likely to encounter minor wear items than serious faults—budget for routine maintenance rather than major repairs, but always get a full MOT history check before committing to buy.

We have limited data for the 2015 Kawasaki Kle — treat the figures below as indicative rather than definitive.

⚠️ Around 1 in 8 of these vehicles have had a dangerous MOT failure at some point — usually tyres or brakes, and often a one-off issue rather than a persistent problem. The group stats won't tell you which one you're looking at.
First-time pass
90.2%
UK average ~80%
Better than average
Dangerous (ever)
18.1%
At least once in MOT history
Check this vehicle
Avg failures / car
0.8
Over 7 tests on record
Moderate
Typical mileage
13k
Middle half: 9k–20k
For context

These stats describe 271 vehicles as a group. The specific vehicle you're looking at could be the one good example or the one outlier. Run its registration to find out.

Average reliability — agree?

What tends to go wrong

Across 271 vehicles — figures show how many had each issue flagged at least once in their MOT history.

Tyre wear 43.5%
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit · Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit · Front Tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm · …
Budget for a full set — on a vehicle this age, tyres are expected consumables. An inspection will confirm how much is left.
Lighting 26.7%
Drive chain slightly loose · Headlamp aim too high · Headlamp not working on dipped beam
Usually cheap to fix. Worth confirming all lights work before collecting.
Exhaust & emissions 23.4%
Exhaust noisy
Brake wear 19.3%
Front Brake indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort · Rear Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit · Front Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit · …
Ask the seller when brakes were last serviced. If they don't know, factor in the cost.
Other issues 14.7%
Drive chain worn but not considered excessive
Suspension & steering 8.3%
Nearside Front Shock absorber has a light misting of oil · Offside Front Shock absorber has a light misting of oil
Harder to spot without a ramp — this is a good reason to book a pre-purchase inspection.

Data covers a 3-year window centred on 2015.

See this vehicle's full MOT history & AI hunches

Spot recurring advisories, hidden issues, and how it compares to 271 Kawasaki Kle cars.

UK

Before you buy a 2015 Kawasaki Kle

Based on MOT data from 271 vehicles — here's what to check.

  • 📋 Check the full MOT history. 18.1% of these vehicles have had a dangerous defect recorded - recurring advisories often signal problems years before they become failures.
    Search the reg on CarHunch for the full MOT history, reliability stats and a free AI-powered analysis of that exact vehicle.
  • 🔍 Brake pipes, sills and subframes are the key areas on a vehicle this age — structural rust is hard to spot without getting underneath. A mechanic will check all of this before you commit, and give you a concrete basis to negotiate on price. Inspection ClickMechanic
  • 📄 Outstanding finance, insurance write-offs and clocking won't appear in the MOT records — a dedicated history check covers all of this. Our link gets you 20% off automatically. History carVertical Get 20% off via CarHunch

Colour Breakdown

Based on 1,009 Kawasaki Kle vehicles registered in the UK — across all years. From DVLA registration records.

White 28.7%
290
Grey 19%
192
Black 16.6%
167
Orange 14.5%
146
Yellow 13.2%
133
Green 2.4%
24
Red 2.3%
23
Blue 1.6%
16
Silver 1.3%
13
Purple 0.5%
5

Mileage Distribution

Most 2015 Kawasaki Kle vehicles sit in the blue band. If the vehicle you're looking at is outside it, it's either unusually low or high mileage for its age.

13,147
typical
8,850
low mileage
20,165
high mileage

Half of all 2015 Kawasaki Kle vehicles fall between 8,850 and 20,165 miles.

Is the mileage you're seeing normal?
Under 8,850 miles — lower than most. Could be great, or could be a vehicle that rarely moved. Check test frequency and mileage progression in the MOT history.
8,850–20,165 miles — normal for age. This is where most 2015 Kawasaki Kles sit.
Over 27,222 miles — higher than typical. Not necessarily a problem, but check service history and look out for advisory build-up on tyres and brakes.

2015 Kawasaki Kle — Still on the Road

Most 2015 Kawasaki Kles are still being driven.

179 vehicles still getting MOTs in 2025 — 72% of the peak remain.

247 179 2018 2025

Based on vehicles from this manufacture year that had at least one MOT test in each calendar year. Data from 2018–2025.
* The 2020 dip reflects the government's COVID-19 MOT exemption, which allowed certificates to be extended by six months — fewer tests were conducted that year.

MOT History Averages

7
Avg MOT tests per vehicle
0.8
Avg failures per vehicle
2.9
Avg advisories per vehicle
Other model years — Kawasaki Kle: All Kle years → Which year to buy? →
2014 2016

Or browse all models: Kawasaki →

Compare with another model

See how the 2015 Kawasaki Kle stacks up against a rival.

Average reliability — agree?