Italjet Formula (2002)

224 real MOT outcomes analysed • 75.2% first-time pass rate

2002 Italjet Formula

CarHunch analysed 224 real MOT records for the 2002 Italjet Formula. Real test outcomes — pass rates, defect profiles, mileage data — from verified DVLA records. Updated as new MOTs are recorded.
Which year to buy? →

On this page
AI Analysis Reliability Overview Common Issues Check a Specific Reg Buyer's Checklist Mileage Distribution Still on the Road MOT Averages Colour Breakdown Compare Models

The 2002 Italjet Formula has a first-time pass rate of 75.2%, which is below the UK average of 80%, suggesting it's slightly more prone to MOT failure than a typical vehicle of this age. With only 8.5% of vehicles ever showing a dangerous defect, safety concerns are not acute, though the below-average pass rate does warrant a pre-purchase inspection.

These Formulas show relatively low mileage for their age—a median of 8,140 miles suggests many are weekend or leisure machines rather than daily drivers, which often correlates with better preservation. The average of 0.92 failures and 1.4 advisories per vehicle points to routine wear items rather than structural problems, so focus a pre-buy check on brakes, lights, and tyres, and ask the seller about how often the bike has actually been used.

We have limited data for the 2002 Italjet Formula — treat the figures below as indicative rather than definitive.

⚠️ About 1 in 12 of these vehicles have had a dangerous MOT failure at some point — usually tyres or brakes, and often a one-off issue rather than a persistent problem. The group stats won't tell you which one you're looking at.
First-time pass
75.2%
UK average ~80%
Around average
Dangerous (ever)
8.5%
At least once in MOT history
Check this vehicle
Avg failures / car
0.92
Over 3.5 tests on record
Moderate
Typical mileage
8k
Middle half: 5k–11k
For context

These stats describe 224 vehicles as a group. The specific vehicle you're looking at could be the one good example or the one outlier. Run its registration to find out.

Average reliability — agree?

What tends to go wrong

Across 224 vehicles — figures show how many had each issue flagged at least once in their MOT history.

Tyre wear 17.9%
Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit · Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit
Budget for a full set — on a vehicle this age, tyres are expected consumables. An inspection will confirm how much is left.
Brake wear 16.2%
Front Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit · Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick · Stop lamp does not illuminate immediately a brake applies · …
Ask the seller when brakes were last serviced. If they don't know, factor in the cost.
Lighting 15.1%
Rear reflector on motorcycle missing · Headlamp at least one does not illuminate on dipped beam
Usually cheap to fix. Worth confirming all lights work before collecting.
Suspension & steering 11.9%
Steering linkage has slight free play · Steering linkage has excessive free play · Front wheel bearings have slight free play · …
Harder to spot without a ramp — this is a good reason to book a pre-purchase inspection.
Exhaust & emissions 7.1%
Exhaust is leaking and excessively noisey
Other issues 4.3%
Horn not working

Data covers a 3-year window centred on 2002.

See this vehicle's full MOT history & AI hunches

Spot recurring advisories, hidden issues, and how it compares to 224 Italjet Formula cars.

UK

Before you buy a 2002 Italjet Formula

Based on MOT data from 224 vehicles — here's what to check.

  • 📋 Check the full MOT history. 8.5% of these vehicles have had a dangerous defect recorded - recurring advisories often signal problems years before they become failures.
    Search the reg on CarHunch for the full MOT history, reliability stats and a free AI-powered analysis of that exact vehicle.
  • 🔍 Brake pipes, sills and subframes are the key areas on a vehicle this age — structural rust is hard to spot without getting underneath. A mechanic will check all of this before you commit, and give you a concrete basis to negotiate on price. Inspection ClickMechanic
  • 📄 Outstanding finance, insurance write-offs and clocking won't appear in the MOT records — a dedicated history check covers all of this. Our link gets you 20% off automatically. History carVertical Get 20% off via CarHunch

Colour Breakdown

Based on 968 Italjet Formula vehicles registered in the UK — across all years. From DVLA registration records.

Blue 22.8%
221
Silver 19.3%
187
Red 18.8%
182
Black 13.3%
129
White 8.7%
84
Green 6.1%
59
Yellow 4.9%
47
Orange 4.3%
42
Bronze 1.2%
12
Multi-colour 0.5%
5

Mileage Distribution

Most 2002 Italjet Formula vehicles sit in the blue band. If the vehicle you're looking at is outside it, it's either unusually low or high mileage for its age.

8,140
typical
4,989
low mileage
11,343
high mileage

Half of all 2002 Italjet Formula vehicles fall between 4,989 and 11,343 miles.

Is the mileage you're seeing normal?
Under 4,989 miles — lower than most. Could be great, or could be a vehicle that rarely moved. Check test frequency and mileage progression in the MOT history.
4,989–11,343 miles — normal for age. This is where most 2002 Italjet Formulas sit.
Over 15,313 miles — higher than typical. Not necessarily a problem, but check service history and look out for advisory build-up on tyres and brakes.

2002 Italjet Formula — Still on the Road

Numbers are thinning — 44% of 2002 Italjet Formulas are still active.

Numbers are declining — 11 vehicles still getting MOTs in 2021 (44% of peak).

25 11 2014 2021

Based on vehicles from this manufacture year that had at least one MOT test in each calendar year. Data from 2014–2021.
* The 2020 dip reflects the government's COVID-19 MOT exemption, which allowed certificates to be extended by six months — fewer tests were conducted that year.

MOT History Averages

3.5
Avg MOT tests per vehicle
0.92
Avg failures per vehicle
1.4
Avg advisories per vehicle
Other model years — Italjet Formula: All Formula years → Which year to buy? →
1999 2000 2001 2003

Or browse all models: Italjet →

Compare with another model

See how the 2002 Italjet Formula stacks up against a rival.

Average reliability — agree?