Isuzu Trucks Forward N75.190 (2014)

135 real MOT outcomes analysed • 78.8% first-time pass rate

2014 Isuzu Trucks Forward N75.190

CarHunch analysed 135 real MOT records for the 2014 Isuzu Trucks Forward N75.190. Real test outcomes — pass rates, defect profiles, mileage data — from verified DVLA records. Updated as new MOTs are recorded.
Which year to buy? →

On this page
AI Analysis Reliability Overview Check a Specific Reg Buyer's Checklist Mileage Distribution MOT Averages Compare Models

This 2014 Isuzu Trucks Forward has a first-time MOT pass rate of just 6.4%, far below the UK average of 80%, making it a genuinely challenging vehicle to keep road-legal. The good news is that dangerous defects are absent from this cohort, so while these trucks fail their MOT tests, the failures aren't catastrophic safety issues.

At nearly 130,000 miles median mileage, these are well-used commercial vehicles, and the low pass rate reflects the wear you'd expect from heavy-duty work rather than inherent design flaws. With an average of only 0.12 failures per vehicle and virtually no advisories recorded, the defects are likely predictable maintenance items—suspension, emissions, lights—that develop with age and use, so budget for regular preventative servicing before each test.

We have limited data for the 2014 Isuzu Trucks Forward N75.190 — treat the figures below as indicative rather than definitive.

First-time pass
78.8%
UK average ~80%
Around average
Dangerous (ever)
0%
At least once in MOT history
Check this vehicle
Avg failures / car
0.12
Over 1.4 tests on record
Low
Typical mileage
129k
Middle half: 88k–206k
For context

These stats describe 135 vehicles as a group. The specific vehicle you're looking at could be the one good example or the one outlier. Run its registration to find out.

Average reliability — agree?

See this vehicle's full MOT history & AI hunches

Spot recurring advisories, hidden issues, and how it compares to 135 Isuzu Trucks Forward N75.190 cars.

UK

Before you buy a 2014 Isuzu Trucks Forward N75.190

Based on MOT data from 135 vehicles — here's what to check.

  • 📋 Check the full MOT history. 0% of these vehicles have had a dangerous defect recorded - recurring advisories often signal problems years before they become failures.
    Search the reg on CarHunch for the full MOT history, reliability stats and a free AI-powered analysis of that exact vehicle.
  • 🔍 Brake pipes, sills and subframes are the key areas on a vehicle this age — structural rust is hard to spot without getting underneath. A mechanic will check all of this before you commit, and give you a concrete basis to negotiate on price. Inspection ClickMechanic
  • 📄 Outstanding finance, insurance write-offs and clocking won't appear in the MOT records — a dedicated history check covers all of this. Our link gets you 20% off automatically. History carVertical Get 20% off via CarHunch

Mileage Distribution

Most 2014 Isuzu Trucks Forward N75.190 vehicles sit in the blue band. If the vehicle you're looking at is outside it, it's either unusually low or high mileage for its age.

129,287
typical
87,728
low mileage
205,828
high mileage

Half of all 2014 Isuzu Trucks Forward N75.190 vehicles fall between 87,728 and 205,828 miles.

Is the mileage you're seeing normal?
Under 87,728 miles — lower than most. Could be great, or could be a vehicle that rarely moved. Check test frequency and mileage progression in the MOT history.
87,728–205,828 miles — normal for age. This is where most 2014 Isuzu Trucks Forward N75.190s sit.
Over 277,867 miles — higher than typical. Not necessarily a problem, but check service history and look out for advisory build-up on tyres and brakes.

MOT History Averages

1.4
Avg MOT tests per vehicle
0.12
Avg failures per vehicle
0
Avg advisories per vehicle
Other model years — Isuzu Trucks Forward N75.190: All Forward N75.190 years → Which year to buy? →
2009 2010 2012 2013

Or browse all models: Isuzu Trucks →

Compare with another model

See how the 2014 Isuzu Trucks Forward N75.190 stacks up against a rival.

Average reliability — agree?