Honda

Honda Sgx (2001)

248 real MOT outcomes analysed • 83.4% first-time pass rate

2001 Honda Sgx

CarHunch analysed 248 real MOT records for the 2001 Honda Sgx. Real test outcomes — pass rates, defect profiles, mileage data — from verified DVLA records. Updated as new MOTs are recorded.
Which year to buy? →

On this page
AI Analysis Reliability Overview Common Issues Check a Specific Reg Buyer's Checklist Pass Rate by Fuel Mileage Distribution Still on the Road MOT Averages Colour Breakdown Compare Models

The 2001 Honda SGX passes its MOT at 83.4%, slightly above the UK average of 80%, suggesting decent reliability for a 23-year-old model. With only 12.1% of vehicles ever developing dangerous defects, this is a reassuringly low rate that reflects the model's safety credentials.

These cars average just 8,434 miles, which is genuinely low for their age and suggests many are cherished hobby vehicles rather than hard-worked daily drivers—you'd expect higher mileage from typical 2001 models. The 1.29 average failures and 3.1 advisories per vehicle point to the usual wear items (suspension, emissions) rather than systemic engineering problems, so budget for routine maintenance but don't expect surprises; check service history carefully and have a pre-purchase inspection focus on exhaust systems and brake components.

We have limited data for the 2001 Honda Sgx — treat the figures below as indicative rather than definitive.

⚠️ Around 1 in 8 of these vehicles have had a dangerous MOT failure at some point — usually tyres or brakes, and often a one-off issue rather than a persistent problem. The group stats won't tell you which one you're looking at.
First-time pass
83.4%
UK average ~80%
Around average
Dangerous (ever)
12.1%
At least once in MOT history
Check this vehicle
Avg failures / car
1.29
Over 6.8 tests on record
High
Typical mileage
7k
Middle half: 4k–11k
For context

These stats describe 248 vehicles as a group. The specific vehicle you're looking at could be the one good example or the one outlier. Run its registration to find out.

Average reliability — agree?

What tends to go wrong

Across 248 vehicles — figures show how many had each issue flagged at least once in their MOT history.

Suspension & steering 46.8%
Front suspension assembly has slight free play between the sliding members · Steering headbearing has slight free play · Steering headbearing has excessive free play · …
Harder to spot without a ramp — this is a good reason to book a pre-purchase inspection.
Tyre wear 32.9%
Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit · Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit · Rear Tyre tread not clearly visible
Budget for a full set — on a vehicle this age, tyres are expected consumables. An inspection will confirm how much is left.
Brake wear 15.8%
Front Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit · Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick · Stop lamp does not illuminate immediately a brake applies · …
Ask the seller when brakes were last serviced. If they don't know, factor in the cost.
Lighting 13.1%
Headlamp aim too high · Headlamp aim too low
Usually cheap to fix. Worth confirming all lights work before collecting.

Data covers a 3-year window centred on 2001.

See this vehicle's full MOT history & AI hunches

Spot recurring advisories, hidden issues, and how it compares to 248 Honda Sgx cars.

UK

Before you buy a 2001 Honda Sgx

Based on MOT data from 248 vehicles — here's what to check.

  • 📋 Check the full MOT history. 12.1% of these vehicles have had a dangerous defect recorded - recurring advisories often signal problems years before they become failures.
    Search the reg on CarHunch for the full MOT history, reliability stats and a free AI-powered analysis of that exact vehicle.
  • 🔍 Brake pipes, sills and subframes are the key areas on a vehicle this age — structural rust is hard to spot without getting underneath. A mechanic will check all of this before you commit, and give you a concrete basis to negotiate on price. Inspection ClickMechanic
  • 📄 Outstanding finance, insurance write-offs and clocking won't appear in the MOT records — a dedicated history check covers all of this. Our link gets you 20% off automatically. History carVertical Get 20% off via CarHunch

Pass Rate by Fuel Type

Fuel type Vehicles Pass rate Avg failures
Petrol (100%) 247 83.4% 1.29

Colour Breakdown

Based on 1,646 Honda Sgx vehicles registered in the UK — across all years. From DVLA registration records.

Black 36.5%
601
Red 25.4%
418
Blue 21.5%
354
Grey 8.4%
139
Yellow 3.2%
53
Brown 2.4%
40
White 1.6%
26
Orange 0.9%
15

Mileage Distribution

Most 2001 Honda Sgx vehicles sit in the blue band. If the vehicle you're looking at is outside it, it's either unusually low or high mileage for its age.

7,159
typical
4,161
low mileage
11,141
high mileage

Half of all 2001 Honda Sgx vehicles fall between 4,161 and 11,141 miles.

Is the mileage you're seeing normal?
Under 4,161 miles — lower than most. Could be great, or could be a vehicle that rarely moved. Check test frequency and mileage progression in the MOT history.
4,161–11,141 miles — normal for age. This is where most 2001 Honda Sgxs sit.
Over 15,040 miles — higher than typical. Not necessarily a problem, but check service history and look out for advisory build-up on tyres and brakes.

2001 Honda Sgx — Still on the Road

Numbers are thinning — 28% of 2001 Honda Sgxs are still active.

Numbers are declining — 15 vehicles still getting MOTs in 2025 (28% of peak).

53 15 2014 2025

Based on vehicles from this manufacture year that had at least one MOT test in each calendar year. Data from 2014–2025.
* The 2020 dip reflects the government's COVID-19 MOT exemption, which allowed certificates to be extended by six months — fewer tests were conducted that year.

MOT History Averages

6.8
Avg MOT tests per vehicle
1.29
Avg failures per vehicle
3.1
Avg advisories per vehicle
Other model years — Honda Sgx: All Sgx years → Which year to buy? →
1997 1998 1999 2000 2002 2003

Or browse all models: Honda →

Honda logo

Compare with another model

See how the 2001 Honda Sgx stacks up against a rival.

Average reliability — agree?