Honda

Honda Sfx (2000)

271 real MOT outcomes analysed • 81.5% first-time pass rate

2000 Honda Sfx

CarHunch analysed 271 real MOT records for the 2000 Honda Sfx. Real test outcomes — pass rates, defect profiles, mileage data — from verified DVLA records. Updated as new MOTs are recorded.
Which year to buy? →

On this page
AI Analysis Reliability Overview Common Issues Check a Specific Reg Buyer's Checklist Mileage Distribution Still on the Road MOT Averages Colour Breakdown Compare Models

The 2000 Honda SFX passes its MOT on first attempt 81.5% of the time, slightly ahead of the UK average of 80%, and dangerous defects are relatively uncommon at 15.5%—well below the concern threshold. This is a reassuringly reliable little machine for its age, with no major structural weakness emerging from the data.

These vehicles are running at modest mileage for their age (median 8,702 miles, average 10,507), which explains why they're in decent shape, though when failures do occur they average 1.22 per vehicle and advisories hit 2.9, suggesting routine wear on seals, lights, and exhaust components. If you're considering one, get a pre-purchase inspection focusing on the exhaust system and rubber seals, since that's where the numbers point—but overall this is a safe bet for a 24-year-old model.

We have limited data for the 2000 Honda Sfx — treat the figures below as indicative rather than definitive.

⚠️ Around 1 in 8 of these vehicles have had a dangerous MOT failure at some point — usually tyres or brakes, and often a one-off issue rather than a persistent problem. The group stats won't tell you which one you're looking at.
First-time pass
81.5%
UK average ~80%
Around average
Dangerous (ever)
15.5%
At least once in MOT history
Check this vehicle
Avg failures / car
1.22
Over 6 tests on record
High
Typical mileage
9k
Middle half: 6k–13k
For context

These stats describe 271 vehicles as a group. The specific vehicle you're looking at could be the one good example or the one outlier. Run its registration to find out.

Average reliability — agree?

What tends to go wrong

Across 271 vehicles — figures show how many had each issue flagged at least once in their MOT history.

Tyre wear 33.7%
Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit · Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit · Rear Tyre tread not clearly visible
Budget for a full set — on a vehicle this age, tyres are expected consumables. An inspection will confirm how much is left.
Brake wear 17.4%
Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick · Front Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit · Rear Brake lever has inadequate reserve travel · …
Ask the seller when brakes were last serviced. If they don't know, factor in the cost.
Suspension & steering 14.3%
Nearside Front shock absorber has light misting of stanchion · Steering headbearing has slight free play · Nearside Front shock absorber seal failed and leaking oil · …
Harder to spot without a ramp — this is a good reason to book a pre-purchase inspection.
Lighting 8.9%
Headlamp aim too high · Exhaust slightly deteriorated
Usually cheap to fix. Worth confirming all lights work before collecting.
Exhaust & emissions 8.3%
Exhaust is leaking and excessively noisey

Data covers a 3-year window centred on 2000.

See this vehicle's full MOT history & AI hunches

Spot recurring advisories, hidden issues, and how it compares to 271 Honda Sfx cars.

UK

Before you buy a 2000 Honda Sfx

Based on MOT data from 271 vehicles — here's what to check.

  • 📋 Check the full MOT history. 15.5% of these vehicles have had a dangerous defect recorded - recurring advisories often signal problems years before they become failures.
    Search the reg on CarHunch for the full MOT history, reliability stats and a free AI-powered analysis of that exact vehicle.
  • 🔍 Brake pipes, sills and subframes are the key areas on a vehicle this age — structural rust is hard to spot without getting underneath. A mechanic will check all of this before you commit, and give you a concrete basis to negotiate on price. Inspection ClickMechanic
  • 📄 Outstanding finance, insurance write-offs and clocking won't appear in the MOT records — a dedicated history check covers all of this. Our link gets you 20% off automatically. History carVertical Get 20% off via CarHunch

Colour Breakdown

Based on 1,523 Honda Sfx vehicles registered in the UK — across all years. From DVLA registration records.

Black 26.1%
397
Blue 21.3%
324
Silver 17.4%
265
Red 9.9%
151
Yellow 5.3%
81
Purple 4.7%
71
Orange 4%
61
Green 3.8%
58
Beige 3.3%
50
White 2.6%
39
Grey 1.2%
18
Multi-colour 0.5%
8

Mileage Distribution

Most 2000 Honda Sfx vehicles sit in the blue band. If the vehicle you're looking at is outside it, it's either unusually low or high mileage for its age.

8,702
typical
5,733
low mileage
13,443
high mileage

Half of all 2000 Honda Sfx vehicles fall between 5,733 and 13,443 miles.

Is the mileage you're seeing normal?
Under 5,733 miles — lower than most. Could be great, or could be a vehicle that rarely moved. Check test frequency and mileage progression in the MOT history.
5,733–13,443 miles — normal for age. This is where most 2000 Honda Sfxs sit.
Over 18,148 miles — higher than typical. Not necessarily a problem, but check service history and look out for advisory build-up on tyres and brakes.

2000 Honda Sfx — Still on the Road

Numbers are thinning — 17% of 2000 Honda Sfxs are still active.

Numbers are declining — 11 vehicles still getting MOTs in 2021 (17% of peak).

63 11 2014 2021

Based on vehicles from this manufacture year that had at least one MOT test in each calendar year. Data from 2014–2021.
* The 2020 dip reflects the government's COVID-19 MOT exemption, which allowed certificates to be extended by six months — fewer tests were conducted that year.

MOT History Averages

6
Avg MOT tests per vehicle
1.22
Avg failures per vehicle
2.9
Avg advisories per vehicle
Other model years — Honda Sfx: All Sfx years → Which year to buy? →
1996 1997 1998 1999 2001 2002 2003

Or browse all models: Honda →

Honda logo

Compare with another model

See how the 2000 Honda Sfx stacks up against a rival.

Average reliability — agree?