Should I check the MOT history before buying a 1998 Honda Fireblade?

Yes. Look for recurring advisories — slow-building issues like corrosion or brake wear patterns show up years before they become failures. A full MOT history analysis will highlight patterns that a single test result won't reveal.

What corrosion should I look for when inspecting a 1998 Honda Fireblade?

Check brake pipes, sills, subframes, and chassis legs. Surface rust is normal at this age; structural rust is a serious problem that is expensive to fix and can fail an MOT.

How are tyres and brakes typically on a 1998 Honda Fireblade?

Tyres and brakes are the most common advisory items on vehicles of this age. Budget for replacement if they are near the limit, and factor this into your offer price.

How many 1998 Honda Fireblade vehicles have had dangerous defects recorded?

20% of these vehicles have had a dangerous defect recorded. Search the registration on CarHunch — the full MOT history will show exactly what was flagged and whether it was resolved.

Is the 1998 Honda Fireblade reliable?

Based on MOT data from 133 vehicles, the 1998 Honda Fireblade has a first-time MOT pass rate of 86.7%, indicating generally reliable for its class. Always check the full MOT history of any specific vehicle before buying.

What are common problems with the 1998 Honda Fireblade?

The most frequently recorded MOT issues on the 1998 Honda Fireblade are: Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (51.5% of vehicles), Exhaust noisy (49% of vehicles), Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (41.5% of vehicles). These figures are based on actual MOT test records — search a specific registration on CarHunch to see its individual history.

Do I need an HPI check when buying a 1998 Honda Fireblade?

Yes. The MOT history will not show outstanding finance, insurance write-offs, or stolen status. An HPI check covers these areas and should be part of any used car purchase.

CarHunch

Get Started

Honda Fireblade (1998)

133 real MOT outcomes analysed • 86.7% first-time pass rate

1998 Honda Fireblade

CarHunch analysed 133 real MOT records for the 1998 Honda Fireblade. Real test outcomes — pass rates, defect profiles, mileage data — from verified DVLA records. Updated as new MOTs are recorded.

On this page

AI Analysis Reliability Overview Common Issues Check a Specific Reg Buyer's Checklist Pass Rate by Fuel Mileage Distribution Still on the Road MOT Averages Compare Models

The 1998 Honda Fireblade shows a first-time pass rate of 86.7%, which sits 6.7 points above the UK average and suggests these bikes have held up reasonably well over 25 years—though one in five has recorded a dangerous defect at some point, which is a genuine concern for a prospective buyer. That's the kind of red flag worth investigating on the specific bike you're looking at.

With a median mileage of just under 26,000 miles for a machine now in its mid-twenties, these Fireblades are typically cherished rather than thrashed, which explains the solid pass rate. The average vehicle picks up 1.67 failures and 5.9 advisories per test, pointing to wear in consumables and minor systems rather than structural or safety problems—but get a pre-purchase inspection done anyway, because that dangerous defect figure means you need eyes on the specific machine before you commit.

We have limited data for the 1998 Honda Fireblade — treat the figures below as indicative rather than definitive.

⚠️ Over 1 in 5 of these cars have had a dangerous MOT failure at some point — usually tyres or brakes, and often a one-off issue rather than a persistent problem. The group stats won't tell you which one you're looking at.

First-time pass

86.7%

UK average ~80%

Around average

Dangerous (ever)

20.3%

At least once in MOT history

Check this vehicle

Avg failures / car

1.67

Over 11.6 tests on record

High

Typical mileage

26k

Middle half: 19k–36k

For context

These stats describe 133 vehicles as a group. The specific vehicle you're looking at could be the one good example or the one outlier. Run its registration to find out.

What tends to go wrong

Based on 133 cars. % = share of cohort with at least one match (advisories + failures combined).

~1 in 3 Tyre wear

Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (51.5%) · Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (41.5%) · Rear Tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm (11.5%)

💡 Budget for a full set — on a vehicle this age, tyres are expected consumables. A used-car inspection will confirm how much is left.

~1 in 3 Exhaust & emissions

Exhaust noisy (49%)

~1 in 3 Brake wear

Front Roller brake test indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (32.5%) · Rear Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (23.5%) · Front Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (18.5%) · …

💡 Ask the seller when brakes were last serviced. If they don't know, factor in the cost.

~1 in 3 Lighting

Drive chain slightly loose (29.5%) · Headlamp aim beam image kick up to the offside (9%)

💡 Usually cheap to fix. Worth confirming all lights work before collecting.

~1 in 10 Other issues

Drive chain worn but not considered excessive (12.5%)

~1 in 10 Suspension & steering

Rear wheel bearings have slight free play (10.5%) · Steering movement slightly 'notchy' (10%) · Nearside Front shock absorber has light misting of stanchion (8%)

💡 Harder to spot without a ramp — this is a good reason to book a pre-purchase inspection.

Data covers a 3-year window centred on 1998. Counts include advisories and failures.

See this vehicle's full MOT history & AI hunches

Spot recurring advisories, hidden issues, and how it compares to 133 Honda Fireblade cars.

Before you buy a 1998 Honda Fireblade

Based on MOT data from 133 vehicles — here's what to check.

📋 Check the full MOT history. 20.3% of these vehicles have had a dangerous defect recorded - recurring advisories often signal problems years before they become failures.
Search the reg on CarHunch for the full MOT history, reliability stats and a free AI-powered analysis of that exact vehicle.
🔍 Brake pipes, sills and subframes are the key areas on a vehicle this age — structural rust is hard to spot without getting underneath. A mechanic will check all of this before you commit, and give you a concrete basis to negotiate on price. Inspection →
📄 Outstanding finance, insurance write-offs and clocking won't appear in the MOT records — a dedicated history check covers all of this. Our link gets you 20% off automatically. History Get 20% off via CarHunch →

Pass Rate by Fuel Type

Fuel type	Vehicles	Pass rate	Avg failures
Petrol (97%)	129	86.7%	1.71

Mileage Distribution

Most 1998 Honda Fireblade vehicles sit in the blue band. If the vehicle you're looking at is outside it, it's either unusually low or high mileage for its age.

25,905

typical

18,520

low mileage

35,656

high mileage

Half of all 1998 Honda Fireblade vehicles fall between 18,520 and 35,656 miles.

Is the mileage you're seeing normal?

✓ Under 18,520 miles — lower than most. Could be great, or could be a vehicle that rarely moved. Check test frequency and mileage progression in the MOT history.

✓ 18,520–35,656 miles — normal for age. This is where most 1998 Honda Fireblades sit.

⚠ Over 48,135 miles — higher than typical. Not necessarily a problem, but check service history and look out for advisory build-up on tyres and brakes.

1998 Honda Fireblade — Still on the Road

Numbers are thinning — 53% of 1998 Honda Fireblades are still active.

41 vehicles still getting MOTs in 2025 — 53% of the peak remain.

Based on vehicles from this manufacture year that had at least one MOT test in each calendar year. Data from 2014–2025.
* The 2020 dip reflects the government's COVID-19 MOT exemption, which allowed certificates to be extended by six months — fewer tests were conducted that year.

MOT History Averages

11.6

Avg MOT tests per vehicle

1.67

Avg failures per vehicle

5.9

Avg advisories per vehicle

Other model years — Honda Fireblade: All Fireblade years → Which year to buy? →

1994 1995 1996 1997

Or browse all models: Honda →

Compare with another model

See how the 1998 Honda Fireblade stacks up against a rival.

Share this page

X Facebook WhatsApp LinkedIn