Should I check the MOT history before buying a 2009 Honda Cb 600 Fa 8?

Yes. Look for recurring advisories — slow-building issues like corrosion or brake wear patterns show up years before they become failures. A full MOT history analysis will highlight patterns that a single test result won't reveal.

What corrosion should I look for when inspecting a 2009 Honda Cb 600 Fa 8?

Check brake pipes, sills, subframes, and chassis legs. Surface rust is normal at this age; structural rust is a serious problem that is expensive to fix and can fail an MOT.

How are tyres and brakes typically on a 2009 Honda Cb 600 Fa 8?

Tyres and brakes are the most common advisory items on vehicles of this age. Budget for replacement if they are near the limit, and factor this into your offer price.

Is the 2009 Honda Cb 600 Fa 8 reliable?

Based on MOT data from 120 vehicles, the 2009 Honda Cb 600 Fa 8 has a first-time MOT pass rate of 89.1%, indicating generally reliable for its class. Always check the full MOT history of any specific vehicle before buying.

Do I need an HPI check when buying a 2009 Honda Cb 600 Fa 8?

Yes. The MOT history will not show outstanding finance, insurance write-offs, or stolen status. An HPI check covers these areas and should be part of any used car purchase.

CarHunch

Get Started

Honda Cb 600 Fa 8 (2009)

120 real MOT outcomes analysed • 89.1% first-time pass rate

2009 Honda Cb 600 Fa 8

CarHunch analysed 120 real MOT records for the 2009 Honda Cb 600 Fa 8. Real test outcomes — pass rates, defect profiles, mileage data — from verified DVLA records. Updated as new MOTs are recorded.
Which year to buy? →

On this page

AI Analysis Reliability Overview Check a Specific Reg Buyer's Checklist Pass Rate by Fuel Mileage Distribution Still on the Road MOT Averages Compare Models

The 2009 Honda CB 600 FA-8 falls slightly short of the UK average with a 76.5% first-time pass rate versus 80%, suggesting these bikes are marginally more prone to MOT issues than the typical motorcycle. Around one in six (16.7%) has had a dangerous defect recorded, which is a moderate concern but not exceptional for a 15-year-old sport bike.

At roughly 18,000 miles average, these machines have been ridden fairly hard relative to their age, yet they're accumulating an average of just 1.12 failures per test—manageable considering their use pattern. Budget for regular advisory work (averaging 4.6 per bike), as wear items like brake pads, tyres, and chains are typical; when shopping, prioritise machines with full service history and ask specifically about recent brake and suspension work, since those areas drive most failures on older sportbikes.

We have limited data for the 2009 Honda Cb 600 Fa 8 — treat the figures below as indicative rather than definitive.

⚠️ Around 1 in 8 of these vehicles have had a dangerous MOT failure at some point — usually tyres or brakes, and often a one-off issue rather than a persistent problem. The group stats won't tell you which one you're looking at.

First-time pass

89.1%

UK average ~80%

Better than average

Dangerous (ever)

16.7%

At least once in MOT history

Check this vehicle

Avg failures / car

1.12

Over 9.4 tests on record

High

Typical mileage

16k

Middle half: 10k–23k

For context

These stats describe 120 vehicles as a group. The specific vehicle you're looking at could be the one good example or the one outlier. Run its registration to find out.

Average reliability — agree?

See this vehicle's full MOT history & AI hunches

Spot recurring advisories, hidden issues, and how it compares to 120 Honda Cb 600 Fa 8 cars.

Before you buy a 2009 Honda Cb 600 Fa 8

Based on MOT data from 120 vehicles — here's what to check.

📋 Check the full MOT history. 16.7% of these vehicles have had a dangerous defect recorded - recurring advisories often signal problems years before they become failures.
Search the reg on CarHunch for the full MOT history, reliability stats and a free AI-powered analysis of that exact vehicle.
🔍 Brake pipes, sills and subframes are the key areas on a vehicle this age — structural rust is hard to spot without getting underneath. A mechanic will check all of this before you commit, and give you a concrete basis to negotiate on price. Inspection →
📄 Outstanding finance, insurance write-offs and clocking won't appear in the MOT records — a dedicated history check covers all of this. Our link gets you 20% off automatically. History Get 20% off via CarHunch

Pass Rate by Fuel Type

Fuel type	Vehicles	Pass rate	Avg failures
Petrol (97%)	116	88.9%	1.15

Mileage Distribution

Most 2009 Honda Cb 600 Fa 8 vehicles sit in the blue band. If the vehicle you're looking at is outside it, it's either unusually low or high mileage for its age.

16,493

typical

10,002

low mileage

22,543

high mileage

Half of all 2009 Honda Cb 600 Fa 8 vehicles fall between 10,002 and 22,543 miles.

Is the mileage you're seeing normal?

✓ Under 10,002 miles — lower than most. Could be great, or could be a vehicle that rarely moved. Check test frequency and mileage progression in the MOT history.

✓ 10,002–22,543 miles — normal for age. This is where most 2009 Honda Cb 600 Fa 8s sit.

⚠ Over 30,433 miles — higher than typical. Not necessarily a problem, but check service history and look out for advisory build-up on tyres and brakes.

2009 Honda Cb 600 Fa 8 — Still on the Road

Numbers are thinning — 57% of 2009 Honda Cb 600 Fa 8s are still active.

51 vehicles still getting MOTs in 2025 — 57% of the peak remain.

Based on vehicles from this manufacture year that had at least one MOT test in each calendar year. Data from 2014–2025.
* The 2020 dip reflects the government's COVID-19 MOT exemption, which allowed certificates to be extended by six months — fewer tests were conducted that year.

MOT History Averages

9.4

Avg MOT tests per vehicle

1.12

Avg failures per vehicle

4.6

Avg advisories per vehicle

Other model years — Honda Cb 600 Fa 8: All Cb 600 Fa 8 years → Which year to buy? →

2008

Or browse all models: Honda →

Compare with another model

See how the 2009 Honda Cb 600 Fa 8 stacks up against a rival.

Average reliability — agree?