Ford

Ford Tourneo Custom 300 Ltd E Tech (2015)

154 real MOT outcomes analysed • 82.9% first-time pass rate

2015 Ford Tourneo Custom 300 Ltd E Tech

CarHunch analysed 154 real MOT records for the 2015 Ford Tourneo Custom 300 Ltd E Tech. Real test outcomes — pass rates, defect profiles, mileage data — from verified DVLA records. Updated as new MOTs are recorded.
Which year to buy? →

On this page
Reliability Overview Check a Specific Reg Buyer's Checklist Pass Rate by Fuel Mileage Distribution Still on the Road MOT Averages Compare Models

Limited data for this trim variant. The DVLA records this vehicle under a specific trim-level name with only 154 vehicles on record — some statistics may not be reliable at this sample size.

See the full 2015 FORD TOURNEO (2,445 vehicles)

We have limited data for the 2015 Ford Tourneo Custom 300 Ltd E Tech — treat the figures below as indicative rather than definitive.

First-time pass
82.9%
UK average ~80%
Around average
Dangerous (ever)
0%
At least once in MOT history
Check this vehicle
Avg failures / car
0.38
Over 2.8 tests on record
Low
Typical mileage
111k
Middle half: 76k–137k
For context

These stats describe 154 vehicles as a group. The specific vehicle you're looking at could be the one good example or the one outlier. Run its registration to find out.

Average reliability — agree?

See this vehicle's full MOT history & AI hunches

Spot recurring advisories, hidden issues, and how it compares to 154 Ford Tourneo Custom 300 Ltd E Tech cars.

UK

Before you buy a 2015 Ford Tourneo Custom 300 Ltd E Tech

Based on MOT data from 154 vehicles — here's what to check.

  • 📋 Check the full MOT history. 0% of these vehicles have had a dangerous defect recorded - recurring advisories often signal problems years before they become failures.
    Search the reg on CarHunch for the full MOT history, reliability stats and a free AI-powered analysis of that exact vehicle.
  • 🔍 Brake pipes, sills and subframes are the key areas on a vehicle this age — structural rust is hard to spot without getting underneath. A mechanic will check all of this before you commit, and give you a concrete basis to negotiate on price. Inspection ClickMechanic
  • 📄 Outstanding finance, insurance write-offs and clocking won't appear in the MOT records — a dedicated history check covers all of this. Our link gets you 20% off automatically. History carVertical Get 20% off via CarHunch

Pass Rate by Fuel Type

Fuel type Vehicles Pass rate Avg failures
Diesel (99%) 152 82.9% 0.38

Mileage Distribution

Most 2015 Ford Tourneo Custom 300 Ltd E Tech vehicles sit in the blue band. If the vehicle you're looking at is outside it, it's either unusually low or high mileage for its age.

111,242
typical
75,846
low mileage
137,211
high mileage

Half of all 2015 Ford Tourneo Custom 300 Ltd E Tech vehicles fall between 75,846 and 137,211 miles.

Is the mileage you're seeing normal?
Under 75,846 miles — lower than most. Could be great, or could be a vehicle that rarely moved. Check test frequency and mileage progression in the MOT history.
75,846–137,211 miles — normal for age. This is where most 2015 Ford Tourneo Custom 300 Ltd E Techs sit.
Over 185,234 miles — higher than typical. Not necessarily a problem, but check service history and look out for advisory build-up on tyres and brakes.

2015 Ford Tourneo Custom 300 Ltd E Tech — Still on the Road

Almost all 2015 Ford Tourneo Custom 300 Ltd E Techs are still on the road.

Strong survival — 52 vehicles still getting MOTs in 2025, 100% of the peak.

20 52 2018 2025

Based on vehicles from this manufacture year that had at least one MOT test in each calendar year. Data from 2018–2025.
* The 2020 dip reflects the government's COVID-19 MOT exemption, which allowed certificates to be extended by six months — fewer tests were conducted that year.

MOT History Averages

2.8
Avg MOT tests per vehicle
0.38
Avg failures per vehicle
0
Avg advisories per vehicle
Ford logo

Compare with another model

See how the 2015 Ford Tourneo Custom 300 Ltd E Tech stacks up against a rival.

Average reliability — agree?