Fiat

Fiat Qubo (2017)

208 real MOT outcomes analysed • 85.9% first-time pass rate

2017 Fiat Qubo

CarHunch analysed 208 real MOT records for the 2017 Fiat Qubo. Real test outcomes — pass rates, defect profiles, mileage data — from verified DVLA records. Updated as new MOTs are recorded.
Which year to buy? →

On this page
AI Analysis Reliability Overview Common Issues Check a Specific Reg Buyer's Checklist Pass Rate by Fuel Mileage Distribution Still on the Road MOT Averages Colour Breakdown Compare Models

The 2017 Fiat Qubo passes its MOT first time at 85.9%, which is comfortably above the UK average of 80%, suggesting this is a reasonably reliable small van. However, one in five of these vehicles (21.6%) has recorded a dangerous defect at some point, which is notably high and worth investigating during any pre-purchase inspection.

These Qubos show relatively low mileage for their age at 28,424 miles on average, indicating light commercial or domestic use rather than heavy work duty. With an average of 1.22 failures per vehicle and 6.8 advisories, the typical issues are minor rather than catastrophic—so budget for routine maintenance, and get a full history check to understand what specific defects have occurred on any individual van you're considering.

We have limited data for the 2017 Fiat Qubo — treat the figures below as indicative rather than definitive.

⚠️ Over 1 in 5 of these vehicles have had a dangerous MOT failure at some point — usually tyres or brakes, and often a one-off issue rather than a persistent problem. The group stats won't tell you which one you're looking at.
First-time pass
85.9%
UK average ~80%
Around average
Dangerous (ever)
21.6%
At least once in MOT history
Check this vehicle
Avg failures / car
1.22
Over 7.5 tests on record
High
Typical mileage
27k
Middle half: 17k–42k
For context

These stats describe 208 vehicles as a group. The specific vehicle you're looking at could be the one good example or the one outlier. Run its registration to find out.

Average reliability — agree?

What tends to go wrong

Across 208 vehicles — figures show how many had each issue flagged at least once in their MOT history.

Tyre wear 45.7%
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge · Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge · Nearside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing · …
Budget for a full set — on a vehicle this age, tyres are expected consumables. An inspection will confirm how much is left.
Suspension & steering 19.4%
Offside Front Coil spring fractured or broken · Nearside Front Coil spring fractured or broken
Harder to spot without a ramp — this is a good reason to book a pre-purchase inspection.
Brake wear 14.5%
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin · Offside Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened · Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened · …
Ask the seller when brakes were last serviced. If they don't know, factor in the cost.
Other issues 11.2%
COVID-19 6 MONTH EXTENSION · Engine MIL inoperative or indicates a malfunction

Data covers a 3-year window centred on 2017.

See this vehicle's full MOT history & AI hunches

Spot recurring advisories, hidden issues, and how it compares to 208 Fiat Qubo cars.

UK

Before you buy a 2017 Fiat Qubo

Based on MOT data from 208 vehicles — here's what to check.

  • 📋 Check the full MOT history. 21.6% of these vehicles have had a dangerous defect recorded - recurring advisories often signal problems years before they become failures.
    Search the reg on CarHunch for the full MOT history, reliability stats and a free AI-powered analysis of that exact vehicle.
  • 🔍 Brake pipes, sills and subframes are the key areas on a vehicle this age — structural rust is hard to spot without getting underneath. A mechanic will check all of this before you commit, and give you a concrete basis to negotiate on price. Inspection ClickMechanic
  • 📄 Outstanding finance, insurance write-offs and clocking won't appear in the MOT records — a dedicated history check covers all of this. Our link gets you 20% off automatically. History carVertical Get 20% off via CarHunch

Pass Rate by Fuel Type

Fuel type Vehicles Pass rate Avg failures
Diesel (67%) 140 85.4% 1.3
Petrol (33%) 68 87% 1.06

Colour Breakdown

Based on 5,225 Fiat Qubo vehicles registered in the UK — across all years. From DVLA registration records.

Blue 28.1%
1,469
Red 17.1%
892
Silver 15.9%
830
Green 14.2%
742
Black 12.1%
630
White 6.6%
344
Orange 4.7%
244
Bronze 0.7%
39
Grey 0.3%
16
Beige 0.2%
11
Purple 0.2%
8

Mileage Distribution

Most 2017 Fiat Qubo vehicles sit in the blue band. If the vehicle you're looking at is outside it, it's either unusually low or high mileage for its age.

27,218
typical
17,216
low mileage
42,132
high mileage

Half of all 2017 Fiat Qubo vehicles fall between 17,216 and 42,132 miles.

Is the mileage you're seeing normal?
Under 17,216 miles — lower than most. Could be great, or could be a vehicle that rarely moved. Check test frequency and mileage progression in the MOT history.
17,216–42,132 miles — normal for age. This is where most 2017 Fiat Qubos sit.
Over 56,878 miles — higher than typical. Not necessarily a problem, but check service history and look out for advisory build-up on tyres and brakes.

2017 Fiat Qubo — Still on the Road

Almost all 2017 Fiat Qubos are still on the road.

Strong survival — 195 vehicles still getting MOTs in 2025, 96% of the peak.

204 195 2020 2025

Based on vehicles from this manufacture year that had at least one MOT test in each calendar year. Data from 2020–2025.
* The 2020 dip reflects the government's COVID-19 MOT exemption, which allowed certificates to be extended by six months — fewer tests were conducted that year.

MOT History Averages

7.5
Avg MOT tests per vehicle
1.22
Avg failures per vehicle
6.8
Avg advisories per vehicle
Other model years — Fiat Qubo: All Qubo years → Which year to buy? →
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2018 2019

Or browse all models: Fiat →

Fiat logo

Compare with another model

See how the 2017 Fiat Qubo stacks up against a rival.

Average reliability — agree?