Should I check the MOT history before buying a 2006 Chrysler Jeep Commander?

Yes. Look for recurring advisories — slow-building issues like corrosion or brake wear patterns show up years before they become failures. A full MOT history analysis will highlight patterns that a single test result won't reveal.

What corrosion should I look for when inspecting a 2006 Chrysler Jeep Commander?

Check brake pipes, sills, subframes, and chassis legs. Surface rust is normal at this age; structural rust is a serious problem that is expensive to fix and can fail an MOT.

How are tyres and brakes typically on a 2006 Chrysler Jeep Commander?

Tyres and brakes are the most common advisory items on vehicles of this age. Budget for replacement if they are near the limit, and factor this into your offer price.

How many 2006 Chrysler Jeep Commander vehicles have had dangerous defects recorded?

30% of these vehicles have had a dangerous defect recorded. Search the registration on CarHunch — the full MOT history will show exactly what was flagged and whether it was resolved.

Is the 2006 Chrysler Jeep Commander reliable?

Based on MOT data from 266 vehicles, the 2006 Chrysler Jeep Commander has a first-time MOT pass rate of 77.5%, indicating generally reliable for its class. Always check the full MOT history of any specific vehicle before buying.

What are common problems with the 2006 Chrysler Jeep Commander?

The most frequently recorded MOT issues on the 2006 Chrysler Jeep Commander are: Oil leak, but not excessive (61.5% of vehicles), Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (53.1% of vehicles), Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (50.8% of vehicles). These figures are based on actual MOT test records — search a specific registration on CarHunch to see its individual history.

Do I need an HPI check when buying a 2006 Chrysler Jeep Commander?

Yes. The MOT history will not show outstanding finance, insurance write-offs, or stolen status. An HPI check covers these areas and should be part of any used car purchase.

CarHunch

Get Started

Chrysler Jeep Commander (2006)

266 real MOT outcomes analysed • 77.5% first-time pass rate

2006 Chrysler Jeep Commander

CarHunch analysed 266 real MOT records for the 2006 Chrysler Jeep Commander. Real test outcomes — pass rates, defect profiles, mileage data — from verified DVLA records. Updated as new MOTs are recorded.
Which year to buy? →

On this page

AI Analysis Reliability Overview Common Issues Check a Specific Reg Buyer's Checklist Pass Rate by Fuel Mileage Distribution Still on the Road MOT Averages Colour Breakdown Compare Models

The 2006 Chrysler-Jeep Commander has a first-time MOT pass rate of 77.5%, slightly below the UK average of 80%, and nearly 30% of these vehicles have recorded dangerous defects at some point—a significant concern for any potential buyer. The diesel engines (which make up the vast majority of the cohort) perform marginally worse than the overall figure at 76.8%.

At 87,000 miles median, these Commanders show typical mileage for their age, yet they're racking up an average of 3.73 failures and 22.5 advisories per test, suggesting ageing components and wear are catching up with them. If you're considering one, budget for multiple repairs rather than expecting a simple fix, and have a pre-purchase inspection focus on brakes, suspension, and fluid systems where the high advisory count suggests problems cluster.

We have limited data for the 2006 Chrysler Jeep Commander — treat the figures below as indicative rather than definitive.

⚠️ Over 1 in 5 of these vehicles have had a dangerous MOT failure at some point — usually tyres or brakes, and often a one-off issue rather than a persistent problem. The group stats won't tell you which one you're looking at.

First-time pass

77.5%

UK average ~80%

Around average

Dangerous (ever)

29.7%

At least once in MOT history

Check this vehicle

Avg failures / car

3.73

Over 15.6 tests on record

High

Typical mileage

87k

Middle half: 70k–109k

For context

These stats describe 266 vehicles as a group. The specific vehicle you're looking at could be the one good example or the one outlier. Run its registration to find out.

Watch for defects — worth knowing

What tends to go wrong

Across 266 vehicles — figures show how many had each issue flagged at least once in their MOT history.

Other issues 61.5%

Oil leak, but not excessive · Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 40mm circle outside zone 'A' · Under-trays fitted obscuring some underside components · …

Tyre wear 53.1%

Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit · Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit · Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit · …

Budget for a full set — on a vehicle this age, tyres are expected consumables. An inspection will confirm how much is left.

Brake wear 43.9%

Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin · Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin

Ask the seller when brakes were last serviced. If they don't know, factor in the cost.

Lighting 30.2%

Nearside Front position lamp(s) not working · Offside Front position lamp(s) not working

Usually cheap to fix. Worth confirming all lights work before collecting.

Data covers a 3-year window centred on 2006.

See this vehicle's full MOT history & AI hunches

Spot recurring advisories, hidden issues, and how it compares to 266 Chrysler Jeep Commander cars.

Before you buy a 2006 Chrysler Jeep Commander

Based on MOT data from 266 vehicles — here's what to check.

📋 Check the full MOT history. 29.7% of these vehicles have had a dangerous defect recorded - recurring advisories often signal problems years before they become failures.
Search the reg on CarHunch for the full MOT history, reliability stats and a free AI-powered analysis of that exact vehicle.
🔍 Brake pipes, sills and subframes are the key areas on a vehicle this age — structural rust is hard to spot without getting underneath. A mechanic will check all of this before you commit, and give you a concrete basis to negotiate on price. Inspection →
📄 Outstanding finance, insurance write-offs and clocking won't appear in the MOT records — a dedicated history check covers all of this. Our link gets you 20% off automatically. History Get 20% off via CarHunch

Pass Rate by Fuel Type

Fuel type	Vehicles	Pass rate	Avg failures
Diesel (83%)	221	76.8%	3.84

Colour Breakdown

Based on 635 Chrysler Jeep Commander vehicles registered in the UK — across all years. From DVLA registration records.

Black 42.7%

271

Silver 34.3%

218

Grey 17.6%

112

Green 4.6%

Blue 0.8%

Mileage Distribution

Most 2006 Chrysler Jeep Commander vehicles sit in the blue band. If the vehicle you're looking at is outside it, it's either unusually low or high mileage for its age.

87,480

typical

69,814

low mileage

108,946

high mileage

Half of all 2006 Chrysler Jeep Commander vehicles fall between 69,814 and 108,946 miles.

Is the mileage you're seeing normal?

✓ Under 69,814 miles — lower than most. Could be great, or could be a vehicle that rarely moved. Check test frequency and mileage progression in the MOT history.

✓ 69,814–108,946 miles — normal for age. This is where most 2006 Chrysler Jeep Commanders sit.

⚠ Over 147,077 miles — higher than typical. Not necessarily a problem, but check service history and look out for advisory build-up on tyres and brakes.

2006 Chrysler Jeep Commander — Still on the Road

Numbers are thinning — 40% of 2006 Chrysler Jeep Commanders are still active.

Numbers are declining — 90 vehicles still getting MOTs in 2025 (40% of peak).

Based on vehicles from this manufacture year that had at least one MOT test in each calendar year. Data from 2014–2025.
* The 2020 dip reflects the government's COVID-19 MOT exemption, which allowed certificates to be extended by six months — fewer tests were conducted that year.

MOT History Averages

15.6

Avg MOT tests per vehicle

3.73

Avg failures per vehicle

22.5

Avg advisories per vehicle

Other model years — Chrysler Jeep Commander: All Commander years → Which year to buy? →

2007

Or browse all models: Chrysler Jeep →

Compare with another model

See how the 2006 Chrysler Jeep Commander stacks up against a rival.

Watch for defects — worth knowing