BMW

BMW 840 (1999)

204 real MOT outcomes analysed • 78.1% first-time pass rate

1999 BMW 840

CarHunch analysed 204 real MOT records for the 1999 BMW 840. Real test outcomes — pass rates, defect profiles, mileage data — from verified DVLA records. Updated as new MOTs are recorded.
Which year to buy? →

On this page
AI Analysis Reliability Overview Common Issues Check a Specific Reg Buyer's Checklist Mileage Distribution Still on the Road MOT Averages Colour Breakdown Compare Models

The 1999 BMW 840 passes its MOT at 78.1%, slightly below the UK average of 80%, and critically, 22.1% of these cars have recorded a dangerous defect at some point—a real buyer concern that suggests you need a thorough pre-purchase inspection. These are aging luxury saloons with modest mileage for their age (median 80,782 miles), yet they rack up an average of 4.08 failures and 26.6 advisories per test, pointing to expensive wear on complex German engineering.

The high advisory count is the story here: this isn't a car failing on major items every test, but rather accumulating niggles across suspension, electrics, and trim that cost money to fix. Before you buy one, get a pre-purchase inspection from a BMW-specialist mechanic, not a general garage, and budget for the advisories that will likely appear at the next MOT.

We have limited data for the 1999 BMW 840 — treat the figures below as indicative rather than definitive.

⚠️ Over 1 in 5 of these vehicles have had a dangerous MOT failure at some point — usually tyres or brakes, and often a one-off issue rather than a persistent problem. The group stats won't tell you which one you're looking at.
First-time pass
78.1%
UK average ~80%
Around average
Dangerous (ever)
22.1%
At least once in MOT history
Check this vehicle
Avg failures / car
4.08
Over 18.1 tests on record
High
Typical mileage
81k
Middle half: 64k–106k
For context

These stats describe 204 vehicles as a group. The specific vehicle you're looking at could be the one good example or the one outlier. Run its registration to find out.

Average reliability — agree?

What tends to go wrong

Across 204 vehicles — figures show how many had each issue flagged at least once in their MOT history.

Other issues 81.4%
Fuel pipe/s corroded · Oil leak, but not excessive · Fuel Pipe/s corroded · …
Tyre wear 65.6%
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit · Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit · Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit · …
Budget for a full set — on a vehicle this age, tyres are expected consumables. An inspection will confirm how much is left.
Brake wear 40.6%
Nearside Front Brake pipe slightly corroded · Offside Front Brake pipe slightly corroded · Brake pipe slightly corroded · …
Ask the seller when brakes were last serviced. If they don't know, factor in the cost.
Lighting 32.9%
Offside Headlamp aim too low · Nearside Headlamp aim too low
Usually cheap to fix. Worth confirming all lights work before collecting.
Suspension & steering 32.1%
Nearside Rear Trailing arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement · Offside Rear Trailing arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement
Harder to spot without a ramp — this is a good reason to book a pre-purchase inspection.

Data covers a 3-year window centred on 1999.

See this vehicle's full MOT history & AI hunches

Spot recurring advisories, hidden issues, and how it compares to 204 BMW 840 cars.

UK

Before you buy a 1999 BMW 840

Based on MOT data from 204 vehicles — here's what to check.

  • 📋 Check the full MOT history. 22.1% of these vehicles have had a dangerous defect recorded - recurring advisories often signal problems years before they become failures.
    Search the reg on CarHunch for the full MOT history, reliability stats and a free AI-powered analysis of that exact vehicle.
  • 🔍 Brake pipes, sills and subframes are the key areas on a vehicle this age — structural rust is hard to spot without getting underneath. A mechanic will check all of this before you commit, and give you a concrete basis to negotiate on price. Inspection ClickMechanic
  • 📄 Outstanding finance, insurance write-offs and clocking won't appear in the MOT records — a dedicated history check covers all of this. Our link gets you 20% off automatically. History carVertical Get 20% off via CarHunch

Colour Breakdown

Based on 1,818 BMW 840 vehicles registered in the UK — across all years. From DVLA registration records.

Blue 33.2%
603
Green 17.8%
323
Silver 15%
273
Red 14.2%
258
Black 12.8%
232
Purple 2.3%
42
Grey 2.2%
40
Yellow 1.5%
27
White 1.1%
20

Mileage Distribution

Most 1999 BMW 840 vehicles sit in the blue band. If the vehicle you're looking at is outside it, it's either unusually low or high mileage for its age.

80,782
typical
63,707
low mileage
105,993
high mileage

Half of all 1999 BMW 840 vehicles fall between 63,707 and 105,993 miles.

Is the mileage you're seeing normal?
Under 63,707 miles — lower than most. Could be great, or could be a vehicle that rarely moved. Check test frequency and mileage progression in the MOT history.
63,707–105,993 miles — normal for age. This is where most 1999 BMW 840s sit.
Over 143,090 miles — higher than typical. Not necessarily a problem, but check service history and look out for advisory build-up on tyres and brakes.

1999 BMW 840 — Still on the Road

Numbers are thinning — 67% of 1999 BMW 840s are still active.

103 vehicles still getting MOTs in 2025 — 67% of the peak remain.

151 103 2014 2025

Based on vehicles from this manufacture year that had at least one MOT test in each calendar year. Data from 2014–2025.
* The 2020 dip reflects the government's COVID-19 MOT exemption, which allowed certificates to be extended by six months — fewer tests were conducted that year.

MOT History Averages

18.1
Avg MOT tests per vehicle
4.08
Avg failures per vehicle
26.6
Avg advisories per vehicle
Other model years — BMW 840: All 840 years → Which year to buy? →
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998

Or browse all models: BMW →

BMW logo

Compare with another model

See how the 1999 BMW 840 stacks up against a rival.

Average reliability — agree?